Cargando…

Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND: With an ageing population and increasing numbers of people with life-limiting illness, there is a growing demand for palliative day services. There is a need to measure and demonstrate the quality of these services, but there is currently little agreement on which aspects of care should...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Seán R., Dempster, Martin, McCorry, Noleen K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0489-4
_version_ 1783237089296384000
author O’Connor, Seán R.
Dempster, Martin
McCorry, Noleen K.
author_facet O’Connor, Seán R.
Dempster, Martin
McCorry, Noleen K.
author_sort O’Connor, Seán R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With an ageing population and increasing numbers of people with life-limiting illness, there is a growing demand for palliative day services. There is a need to measure and demonstrate the quality of these services, but there is currently little agreement on which aspects of care should be used to do this. The aim of the scoping review will be to map the extent, range and nature of the evidence around models of delivery, care domains and existing quality indicators used to evaluate palliative day services. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) will be searched for evidence using consensus development methods; randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials; mixed methods; and prospective, longitudinal or retrospective case-control studies to develop or test quality indicators for evaluating palliative care within non-residential settings, including day hospices and community or primary care settings. At least two researchers will independently conduct all searches, study selection and data abstraction procedures. Meta-analyses and statistical methods of synthesis are not planned as part of the review. Results will be reported using numerical counts, including number of indicators in each care domain and by using qualitative approach to describe important indicator characteristics. A conceptual model will also be developed to summarise the impact of different aspects of quality in a palliative day service context. Methodological quality relating to indicator development will be assessed using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) tool. Overall strength of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Final decisions on quality assessment will be made via consensus between review authors. DISCUSSION: Identifying, developing and implementing evidence-based quality indicators is critical to the evaluation and continued improvement of palliative care. Review findings will be used to support clinicians and policymakers make decisions on which quality indicators are most appropriate for evaluating day services at the patient and service level, and to identify areas for further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0489-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54346372017-05-18 Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol O’Connor, Seán R. Dempster, Martin McCorry, Noleen K. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: With an ageing population and increasing numbers of people with life-limiting illness, there is a growing demand for palliative day services. There is a need to measure and demonstrate the quality of these services, but there is currently little agreement on which aspects of care should be used to do this. The aim of the scoping review will be to map the extent, range and nature of the evidence around models of delivery, care domains and existing quality indicators used to evaluate palliative day services. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) will be searched for evidence using consensus development methods; randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials; mixed methods; and prospective, longitudinal or retrospective case-control studies to develop or test quality indicators for evaluating palliative care within non-residential settings, including day hospices and community or primary care settings. At least two researchers will independently conduct all searches, study selection and data abstraction procedures. Meta-analyses and statistical methods of synthesis are not planned as part of the review. Results will be reported using numerical counts, including number of indicators in each care domain and by using qualitative approach to describe important indicator characteristics. A conceptual model will also be developed to summarise the impact of different aspects of quality in a palliative day service context. Methodological quality relating to indicator development will be assessed using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) tool. Overall strength of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Final decisions on quality assessment will be made via consensus between review authors. DISCUSSION: Identifying, developing and implementing evidence-based quality indicators is critical to the evaluation and continued improvement of palliative care. Review findings will be used to support clinicians and policymakers make decisions on which quality indicators are most appropriate for evaluating day services at the patient and service level, and to identify areas for further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0489-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5434637/ /pubmed/28511720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0489-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
O’Connor, Seán R.
Dempster, Martin
McCorry, Noleen K.
Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
title Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
title_full Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
title_short Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
title_sort identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0489-4
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorseanr identifyingmodelsofdeliverycaredomainsandqualityindicatorsrelevanttopalliativedayservicesascopingreviewprotocol
AT dempstermartin identifyingmodelsofdeliverycaredomainsandqualityindicatorsrelevanttopalliativedayservicesascopingreviewprotocol
AT mccorrynoleenk identifyingmodelsofdeliverycaredomainsandqualityindicatorsrelevanttopalliativedayservicesascopingreviewprotocol