Cargando…

A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements

BACKGROUND: In upper-extremity stroke rehabilitation applications, the potential use of Force Myography (FMG) for detecting grasping is especially relevant, as the presence of grasping may be indicative of functional activity, which is a key goal of rehabilitation. To date, most FMG research has foc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadarangani, Gautam P., Menon, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0349-4
_version_ 1783237089792360448
author Sadarangani, Gautam P.
Menon, Carlo
author_facet Sadarangani, Gautam P.
Menon, Carlo
author_sort Sadarangani, Gautam P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In upper-extremity stroke rehabilitation applications, the potential use of Force Myography (FMG) for detecting grasping is especially relevant, as the presence of grasping may be indicative of functional activity, which is a key goal of rehabilitation. To date, most FMG research has focused on the classification of the raw FMG signal (i.e. instantaneous FMG samples) in order to determine the state of the hand. However, given the temporal nature of force generation during grasping, the use of temporal feature extraction techniques may yield increased accuracy. In this study, the effectiveness of classifying temporal features of the FMG signal for the two-class grasp detection problem of “grasp” versus “no grasp” (i.e. no object in hand) was evaluated with ten healthy participants. The experimental protocol comprised grasp and move tasks, requiring the use of six different grasp types frequently used in daily living, in conjunction with arm and hand movements. Data corresponding to arm and hand movements without grasping were also included to evaluate robustness to false positives. The temporal features evaluated were mean absolute value (MAV), root mean squared (RMS), linear fit (LF), parabolic fit (PF), and autoregressive model (AR). Off-line classification performance of the five temporal features, with a 0.5 s extraction window, were determined and compared to that of the raw FMG signal using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: The raw FMG signal yielded AUC of 0.819 ± 0.098. LF and PF resulted in the greatest increases in classification performance, and provided statistically significant increases in performance. The largest increase obtained was with PF, yielding AUC of 0.869 ± 0.061, corresponding to a 6.1% relative increase over the raw FMG signal. Despite the additional fitting term provided by PF, classification performance did not significantly improve with PF when compared to LF. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate that temporal feature extraction techniques that derive models of the data within the window may yield modest improvements in FMG based grasp detection performance. In future studies, the use of model-based temporal features should be evaluated with FMG data from individuals with stroke, who might ultimately benefit from this technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54346392017-05-18 A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements Sadarangani, Gautam P. Menon, Carlo Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: In upper-extremity stroke rehabilitation applications, the potential use of Force Myography (FMG) for detecting grasping is especially relevant, as the presence of grasping may be indicative of functional activity, which is a key goal of rehabilitation. To date, most FMG research has focused on the classification of the raw FMG signal (i.e. instantaneous FMG samples) in order to determine the state of the hand. However, given the temporal nature of force generation during grasping, the use of temporal feature extraction techniques may yield increased accuracy. In this study, the effectiveness of classifying temporal features of the FMG signal for the two-class grasp detection problem of “grasp” versus “no grasp” (i.e. no object in hand) was evaluated with ten healthy participants. The experimental protocol comprised grasp and move tasks, requiring the use of six different grasp types frequently used in daily living, in conjunction with arm and hand movements. Data corresponding to arm and hand movements without grasping were also included to evaluate robustness to false positives. The temporal features evaluated were mean absolute value (MAV), root mean squared (RMS), linear fit (LF), parabolic fit (PF), and autoregressive model (AR). Off-line classification performance of the five temporal features, with a 0.5 s extraction window, were determined and compared to that of the raw FMG signal using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: The raw FMG signal yielded AUC of 0.819 ± 0.098. LF and PF resulted in the greatest increases in classification performance, and provided statistically significant increases in performance. The largest increase obtained was with PF, yielding AUC of 0.869 ± 0.061, corresponding to a 6.1% relative increase over the raw FMG signal. Despite the additional fitting term provided by PF, classification performance did not significantly improve with PF when compared to LF. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate that temporal feature extraction techniques that derive models of the data within the window may yield modest improvements in FMG based grasp detection performance. In future studies, the use of model-based temporal features should be evaluated with FMG data from individuals with stroke, who might ultimately benefit from this technology. BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5434639/ /pubmed/28511661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0349-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sadarangani, Gautam P.
Menon, Carlo
A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
title A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
title_full A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
title_fullStr A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
title_short A preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of Force Myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
title_sort preliminary investigation on the utility of temporal features of force myography in the two-class problem of grasp vs. no-grasp in the presence of upper-extremity movements
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0349-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sadaranganigautamp apreliminaryinvestigationontheutilityoftemporalfeaturesofforcemyographyinthetwoclassproblemofgraspvsnograspinthepresenceofupperextremitymovements
AT menoncarlo apreliminaryinvestigationontheutilityoftemporalfeaturesofforcemyographyinthetwoclassproblemofgraspvsnograspinthepresenceofupperextremitymovements
AT sadaranganigautamp preliminaryinvestigationontheutilityoftemporalfeaturesofforcemyographyinthetwoclassproblemofgraspvsnograspinthepresenceofupperextremitymovements
AT menoncarlo preliminaryinvestigationontheutilityoftemporalfeaturesofforcemyographyinthetwoclassproblemofgraspvsnograspinthepresenceofupperextremitymovements