Cargando…

Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables

A mental health trial is analyzed using a dose–response model, in which the number of sessions attended by the patients is deemed indicative of the dose of psychotherapeutic treatment. Here, the parameter of interest is the difference in causal treatment effects between the subpopulations that take...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginestet, Cedric E., Emsley, Richard, Landau, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.7265
_version_ 1783237137307533312
author Ginestet, Cedric E.
Emsley, Richard
Landau, Sabine
author_facet Ginestet, Cedric E.
Emsley, Richard
Landau, Sabine
author_sort Ginestet, Cedric E.
collection PubMed
description A mental health trial is analyzed using a dose–response model, in which the number of sessions attended by the patients is deemed indicative of the dose of psychotherapeutic treatment. Here, the parameter of interest is the difference in causal treatment effects between the subpopulations that take part in different numbers of therapy sessions. For this data set, interactions between random treatment allocation and prognostic baseline variables provide the requisite instrumental variables. While the corresponding two‐stage least squares (TSLS) estimator tends to have smaller bias than the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator; the TSLS suffers from larger variance. It is therefore appealing to combine the desirable properties of the OLS and TSLS estimators. Such a trade‐off is achieved through an affine combination of these two estimators, using mean squared error as a criterion. This produces the semi‐parametric Stein‐like (SPSL) estimator as introduced by Judge and Mittelhammer (2004). The SPSL estimator is used in conjunction with multiple imputation with chained equations, to provide an estimator that can exploit all available information. Simulated data are also generated to illustrate the superiority of the SPSL estimator over its OLS and TSLS counterparts. A package entitled SteinIV implementing these methods has been made available through the R platform. © 2017 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54349022017-06-01 Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables Ginestet, Cedric E. Emsley, Richard Landau, Sabine Stat Med Research Articles A mental health trial is analyzed using a dose–response model, in which the number of sessions attended by the patients is deemed indicative of the dose of psychotherapeutic treatment. Here, the parameter of interest is the difference in causal treatment effects between the subpopulations that take part in different numbers of therapy sessions. For this data set, interactions between random treatment allocation and prognostic baseline variables provide the requisite instrumental variables. While the corresponding two‐stage least squares (TSLS) estimator tends to have smaller bias than the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator; the TSLS suffers from larger variance. It is therefore appealing to combine the desirable properties of the OLS and TSLS estimators. Such a trade‐off is achieved through an affine combination of these two estimators, using mean squared error as a criterion. This produces the semi‐parametric Stein‐like (SPSL) estimator as introduced by Judge and Mittelhammer (2004). The SPSL estimator is used in conjunction with multiple imputation with chained equations, to provide an estimator that can exploit all available information. Simulated data are also generated to illustrate the superiority of the SPSL estimator over its OLS and TSLS counterparts. A package entitled SteinIV implementing these methods has been made available through the R platform. © 2017 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-21 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5434902/ /pubmed/28222485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.7265 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ginestet, Cedric E.
Emsley, Richard
Landau, Sabine
Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
title Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
title_full Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
title_fullStr Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
title_full_unstemmed Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
title_short Dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
title_sort dose–response modeling in mental health using stein‐like estimators with instrumental variables
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28222485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.7265
work_keys_str_mv AT ginestetcedrice doseresponsemodelinginmentalhealthusingsteinlikeestimatorswithinstrumentalvariables
AT emsleyrichard doseresponsemodelinginmentalhealthusingsteinlikeestimatorswithinstrumentalvariables
AT landausabine doseresponsemodelinginmentalhealthusingsteinlikeestimatorswithinstrumentalvariables