Cargando…

Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests

Viña et al. imply that native forests account for China’s marked increase in tree cover and that tree plantations play a minimal role. All 71 tweets linked to the article reinforce the idea that China’s native forests are returning, whereas a review of their methodology indicates that it is not like...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Holt, Tracy, Putz, Francis Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601768
_version_ 1783237229272891392
author Van Holt, Tracy
Putz, Francis Edward
author_facet Van Holt, Tracy
Putz, Francis Edward
author_sort Van Holt, Tracy
collection PubMed
description Viña et al. imply that native forests account for China’s marked increase in tree cover and that tree plantations play a minimal role. All 71 tweets linked to the article reinforce the idea that China’s native forests are returning, whereas a review of their methodology indicates that it is not likely accurate. Referring news articles (n = 19) were dominated by terms associated with native forests, whereas tree plantations were rarely mentioned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54354182017-05-30 Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests Van Holt, Tracy Putz, Francis Edward Sci Adv Technical Comments Viña et al. imply that native forests account for China’s marked increase in tree cover and that tree plantations play a minimal role. All 71 tweets linked to the article reinforce the idea that China’s native forests are returning, whereas a review of their methodology indicates that it is not likely accurate. Referring news articles (n = 19) were dominated by terms associated with native forests, whereas tree plantations were rarely mentioned. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5435418/ /pubmed/28560322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601768 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Comments
Van Holt, Tracy
Putz, Francis Edward
Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
title Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
title_full Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
title_fullStr Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
title_full_unstemmed Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
title_short Perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
title_sort perpetuating the myth of the return of native forests
topic Technical Comments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601768
work_keys_str_mv AT vanholttracy perpetuatingthemythofthereturnofnativeforests
AT putzfrancisedward perpetuatingthemythofthereturnofnativeforests