Cargando…

Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)

Intraneuronal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides represent an early pathological feature in Alzheimer’s disease. We have therefore utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in combination with endocytosis inhibition to explore the internalisation efficiency and uptake mechanisms of Aβ(1–4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wesén, Emelie, Jeffries, Gavin D. M., Matson Dzebo, Maria, Esbjörner, Elin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02227-9
_version_ 1783237253172035584
author Wesén, Emelie
Jeffries, Gavin D. M.
Matson Dzebo, Maria
Esbjörner, Elin K.
author_facet Wesén, Emelie
Jeffries, Gavin D. M.
Matson Dzebo, Maria
Esbjörner, Elin K.
author_sort Wesén, Emelie
collection PubMed
description Intraneuronal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides represent an early pathological feature in Alzheimer’s disease. We have therefore utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in combination with endocytosis inhibition to explore the internalisation efficiency and uptake mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) monomers in cultured SH-SY5Y cells. We find that both variants are constitutively internalised via endocytosis and that their uptake is proportional to cellular endocytic rate. Moreover, SH-SY5Y cells internalise consistently twice the amount of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40); an imaging-based quantification showed that cells treated with 1 µM peptide for 8 h contained 800,000 peptides of Aβ(1–42) and 400,000 of Aβ(1–40). Both variants co-localised to >90% with lysosomes or other acidic compartments. Dynasore and chlorpromazine endocytosis inhibitors were both found to reduce uptake, particularly of Aβ(1–42). Overexpression of the C-terminal of the clathrin-binding domain of AP180, dynamin2 K44A, or Arf6 Q67L did however not reduce uptake of the Aβ variants. By contrast, perturbation of actin polymerisation and inhibition of macropinocytosis reduced Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake considerably. This study clarifies mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake, pinpoints differences between the two variants and highlights a common and putative role of macropinocytosis in the early accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ in AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54356872017-05-18 Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40) Wesén, Emelie Jeffries, Gavin D. M. Matson Dzebo, Maria Esbjörner, Elin K. Sci Rep Article Intraneuronal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides represent an early pathological feature in Alzheimer’s disease. We have therefore utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in combination with endocytosis inhibition to explore the internalisation efficiency and uptake mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) monomers in cultured SH-SY5Y cells. We find that both variants are constitutively internalised via endocytosis and that their uptake is proportional to cellular endocytic rate. Moreover, SH-SY5Y cells internalise consistently twice the amount of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40); an imaging-based quantification showed that cells treated with 1 µM peptide for 8 h contained 800,000 peptides of Aβ(1–42) and 400,000 of Aβ(1–40). Both variants co-localised to >90% with lysosomes or other acidic compartments. Dynasore and chlorpromazine endocytosis inhibitors were both found to reduce uptake, particularly of Aβ(1–42). Overexpression of the C-terminal of the clathrin-binding domain of AP180, dynamin2 K44A, or Arf6 Q67L did however not reduce uptake of the Aβ variants. By contrast, perturbation of actin polymerisation and inhibition of macropinocytosis reduced Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake considerably. This study clarifies mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake, pinpoints differences between the two variants and highlights a common and putative role of macropinocytosis in the early accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ in AD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5435687/ /pubmed/28515429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02227-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wesén, Emelie
Jeffries, Gavin D. M.
Matson Dzebo, Maria
Esbjörner, Elin K.
Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_full Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_fullStr Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_full_unstemmed Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_short Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_sort endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of aβ(1–42) compared to aβ(1–40)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02227-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wesenemelie endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140
AT jeffriesgavindm endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140
AT matsondzebomaria endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140
AT esbjornerelink endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140