Cargando…

Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals

Antisocial behavior is often assumed to reflect aberrant risk processing. However, many of the most significant forms of antisocial behavior, including crime, reflect the outcomes of decisions made under conditions of ambiguity rather than risk. While risk and ambiguity are formally distinct and exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckholtz, Joshua W., Karmarkar, Uma, Ye, Shengxuan, Brennan, Grace M., Baskin-Sommers, Arielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02149-6
_version_ 1783237256669036544
author Buckholtz, Joshua W.
Karmarkar, Uma
Ye, Shengxuan
Brennan, Grace M.
Baskin-Sommers, Arielle
author_facet Buckholtz, Joshua W.
Karmarkar, Uma
Ye, Shengxuan
Brennan, Grace M.
Baskin-Sommers, Arielle
author_sort Buckholtz, Joshua W.
collection PubMed
description Antisocial behavior is often assumed to reflect aberrant risk processing. However, many of the most significant forms of antisocial behavior, including crime, reflect the outcomes of decisions made under conditions of ambiguity rather than risk. While risk and ambiguity are formally distinct and experimentally dissociable, little is known about ambiguity sensitivity in individuals who engage in chronic antisocial behavior. We used a financial decision-making task in a high-risk community-based sample to test for associations between sensitivity to ambiguity, antisocial behavior, and arrest history. Sensitivity to ambiguity was lower in individuals who met diagnostic criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder. Lower ambiguity sensitivity was also associated with higher externalizing (but not psychopathy) scores, and with higher levels of aggression (but not rule-breaking). Finally, blunted sensitivity to ambiguity also predicted a greater frequency of arrests. Together, these data suggest that alterations in cost-benefit decision-making under conditions of ambiguity may promote antisocial behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54357012017-05-18 Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals Buckholtz, Joshua W. Karmarkar, Uma Ye, Shengxuan Brennan, Grace M. Baskin-Sommers, Arielle Sci Rep Article Antisocial behavior is often assumed to reflect aberrant risk processing. However, many of the most significant forms of antisocial behavior, including crime, reflect the outcomes of decisions made under conditions of ambiguity rather than risk. While risk and ambiguity are formally distinct and experimentally dissociable, little is known about ambiguity sensitivity in individuals who engage in chronic antisocial behavior. We used a financial decision-making task in a high-risk community-based sample to test for associations between sensitivity to ambiguity, antisocial behavior, and arrest history. Sensitivity to ambiguity was lower in individuals who met diagnostic criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder. Lower ambiguity sensitivity was also associated with higher externalizing (but not psychopathy) scores, and with higher levels of aggression (but not rule-breaking). Finally, blunted sensitivity to ambiguity also predicted a greater frequency of arrests. Together, these data suggest that alterations in cost-benefit decision-making under conditions of ambiguity may promote antisocial behavior. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5435701/ /pubmed/28515474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02149-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Buckholtz, Joshua W.
Karmarkar, Uma
Ye, Shengxuan
Brennan, Grace M.
Baskin-Sommers, Arielle
Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals
title Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals
title_full Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals
title_fullStr Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals
title_short Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals
title_sort blunted ambiguity aversion during cost-benefit decisions in antisocial individuals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02149-6
work_keys_str_mv AT buckholtzjoshuaw bluntedambiguityaversionduringcostbenefitdecisionsinantisocialindividuals
AT karmarkaruma bluntedambiguityaversionduringcostbenefitdecisionsinantisocialindividuals
AT yeshengxuan bluntedambiguityaversionduringcostbenefitdecisionsinantisocialindividuals
AT brennangracem bluntedambiguityaversionduringcostbenefitdecisionsinantisocialindividuals
AT baskinsommersarielle bluntedambiguityaversionduringcostbenefitdecisionsinantisocialindividuals