Cargando…

Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) sees increased use in neurosciences as a tool for the exploration of brain oscillations. It has been shown that tACS stimulation in specific frequency bands can result in aftereffects of modulated oscillatory brain activity that persist after the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stecher, Heiko I., Pollok, Tania M., Strüber, Daniel, Sobotka, Fabian, Herrmann, Christoph S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00257
_version_ 1783237286473760768
author Stecher, Heiko I.
Pollok, Tania M.
Strüber, Daniel
Sobotka, Fabian
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_facet Stecher, Heiko I.
Pollok, Tania M.
Strüber, Daniel
Sobotka, Fabian
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_sort Stecher, Heiko I.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) sees increased use in neurosciences as a tool for the exploration of brain oscillations. It has been shown that tACS stimulation in specific frequency bands can result in aftereffects of modulated oscillatory brain activity that persist after the stimulation has ended. The general relationship between persistency of the effect and duration of stimulation is sparsely investigated but previous research has shown that the occurrence of tACS aftereffects depends on the brain state before and during stimulation. Early alpha neurofeedback research suggests that particularly in the alpha band the responsiveness to a manipulation depends on the ambient illumination during measurement. Therefore, in the present study we assessed the brain’s susceptibility to tACS at the individual alpha frequency during darkness compared to ambient illumination. We measured alpha power after 10 min of stimulation in 30 participants while they continuously performed a visual vigilance task. Our results show that immediately after stimulation, the alpha power in the illumination condition for both the stimulated and sham group has increased by only about 7%, compared to about 20% in both groups in the ‘dark’ condition. For the group that did not receive stimulation, the power in darkness remained stable after stimulation, whereas the power in light increased by an additional 10% during the next 30 min. For the group that did receive stimulation, alpha power during these 30 min increased by another 11% in light and 22% in darkness. Since alpha power already increased by about 10% without stimulation, the effect of illumination does not seem to have interacted with the effect of stimulation. Instead, both effects seem to have added up linearly. Although our findings do not show that illumination-induced differences in oscillatory activity influence the susceptibility toward tACS, they stress the importance of controlling for factors like ambient light that might add an independent increase or decrease to the power of brain oscillations during periods, where possible persistent effects of stimulation are explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54358192017-06-01 Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power Stecher, Heiko I. Pollok, Tania M. Strüber, Daniel Sobotka, Fabian Herrmann, Christoph S. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) sees increased use in neurosciences as a tool for the exploration of brain oscillations. It has been shown that tACS stimulation in specific frequency bands can result in aftereffects of modulated oscillatory brain activity that persist after the stimulation has ended. The general relationship between persistency of the effect and duration of stimulation is sparsely investigated but previous research has shown that the occurrence of tACS aftereffects depends on the brain state before and during stimulation. Early alpha neurofeedback research suggests that particularly in the alpha band the responsiveness to a manipulation depends on the ambient illumination during measurement. Therefore, in the present study we assessed the brain’s susceptibility to tACS at the individual alpha frequency during darkness compared to ambient illumination. We measured alpha power after 10 min of stimulation in 30 participants while they continuously performed a visual vigilance task. Our results show that immediately after stimulation, the alpha power in the illumination condition for both the stimulated and sham group has increased by only about 7%, compared to about 20% in both groups in the ‘dark’ condition. For the group that did not receive stimulation, the power in darkness remained stable after stimulation, whereas the power in light increased by an additional 10% during the next 30 min. For the group that did receive stimulation, alpha power during these 30 min increased by another 11% in light and 22% in darkness. Since alpha power already increased by about 10% without stimulation, the effect of illumination does not seem to have interacted with the effect of stimulation. Instead, both effects seem to have added up linearly. Although our findings do not show that illumination-induced differences in oscillatory activity influence the susceptibility toward tACS, they stress the importance of controlling for factors like ambient light that might add an independent increase or decrease to the power of brain oscillations during periods, where possible persistent effects of stimulation are explored. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5435819/ /pubmed/28572761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00257 Text en Copyright © 2017 Stecher, Pollok, Strüber, Sobotka and Herrmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Stecher, Heiko I.
Pollok, Tania M.
Strüber, Daniel
Sobotka, Fabian
Herrmann, Christoph S.
Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power
title Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power
title_full Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power
title_fullStr Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power
title_full_unstemmed Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power
title_short Ten Minutes of α-tACS and Ambient Illumination Independently Modulate EEG α-Power
title_sort ten minutes of α-tacs and ambient illumination independently modulate eeg α-power
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00257
work_keys_str_mv AT stecherheikoi tenminutesofatacsandambientilluminationindependentlymodulateeegapower
AT polloktaniam tenminutesofatacsandambientilluminationindependentlymodulateeegapower
AT struberdaniel tenminutesofatacsandambientilluminationindependentlymodulateeegapower
AT sobotkafabian tenminutesofatacsandambientilluminationindependentlymodulateeegapower
AT herrmannchristophs tenminutesofatacsandambientilluminationindependentlymodulateeegapower