Cargando…

Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality

AIM: The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac interventional structural procedures is well established and appreciated. However, the need for general anaesthesia (GA) throughout the procedure remains a controversial issue. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klettas, Dimitris, Alcock, Emma, Dworakowski, Rafal, MacCarthy, Philip, Monaghan, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28249937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-16-0029
_version_ 1783237296069279744
author Klettas, Dimitris
Alcock, Emma
Dworakowski, Rafal
MacCarthy, Philip
Monaghan, Mark
author_facet Klettas, Dimitris
Alcock, Emma
Dworakowski, Rafal
MacCarthy, Philip
Monaghan, Mark
author_sort Klettas, Dimitris
collection PubMed
description AIM: The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac interventional structural procedures is well established and appreciated. However, the need for general anaesthesia (GA) throughout the procedure remains a controversial issue. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and imaging quality of using a transnasal microrobe that allows the usage of conscious sedation in patients who undergo cardiac structural interventional procedures without missing the benefits, guidance and navigation of conventional trans-procedural TEE. METHODS: We analysed the trans-procedural images of 24 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, TMVI or ASD/PFO closure, using a transnasal 2D microprobe (PHILIPS) and then we compared them with images taken by using a conventional 3D TEE probe (PHILIPS). In particular, we compared the imaging quality of the two probes regarding: (1) The anatomy, visualisation of valvular calcification and transvalvular colour Doppler of the aortic and mitral valve; (2) the imaging quality of PFO, ASD and interatrial communication colour flow; (3) the imaging of left ventricle systolic function and pericardial space and (4) transgastric imaging. RESULTS: All images were graded with a scale from 5 to 1. The average grade of imaging quality in the mitral valve was: anatomy, 4.3; calcification, 3.8; colour Doppler, 4.2. The average grade of imaging quality in the aortic valve was: anatomy, 4.3; calcification, 3.7; colour Doppler, 4.3. The average grade of imaging quality in PFO/ASD was 4.3. The average grade of imaging quality in LV/pericardial space was 4.2. The average grade of imaging quality in transgastric imaging was 4.1. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that transnasal TEE can provide good anatomical image quality of relevant cardiac structures during cardiac structural interventions and this may facilitate these procedures being performed during conscious sedation without having to lose TEE guidance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54358762017-05-18 Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality Klettas, Dimitris Alcock, Emma Dworakowski, Rafal MacCarthy, Philip Monaghan, Mark Echo Res Pract Research AIM: The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac interventional structural procedures is well established and appreciated. However, the need for general anaesthesia (GA) throughout the procedure remains a controversial issue. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and imaging quality of using a transnasal microrobe that allows the usage of conscious sedation in patients who undergo cardiac structural interventional procedures without missing the benefits, guidance and navigation of conventional trans-procedural TEE. METHODS: We analysed the trans-procedural images of 24 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, TMVI or ASD/PFO closure, using a transnasal 2D microprobe (PHILIPS) and then we compared them with images taken by using a conventional 3D TEE probe (PHILIPS). In particular, we compared the imaging quality of the two probes regarding: (1) The anatomy, visualisation of valvular calcification and transvalvular colour Doppler of the aortic and mitral valve; (2) the imaging quality of PFO, ASD and interatrial communication colour flow; (3) the imaging of left ventricle systolic function and pericardial space and (4) transgastric imaging. RESULTS: All images were graded with a scale from 5 to 1. The average grade of imaging quality in the mitral valve was: anatomy, 4.3; calcification, 3.8; colour Doppler, 4.2. The average grade of imaging quality in the aortic valve was: anatomy, 4.3; calcification, 3.7; colour Doppler, 4.3. The average grade of imaging quality in PFO/ASD was 4.3. The average grade of imaging quality in LV/pericardial space was 4.2. The average grade of imaging quality in transgastric imaging was 4.1. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that transnasal TEE can provide good anatomical image quality of relevant cardiac structures during cardiac structural interventions and this may facilitate these procedures being performed during conscious sedation without having to lose TEE guidance. Bioscientifica Ltd 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5435876/ /pubmed/28249937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-16-0029 Text en © 2017 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Klettas, Dimitris
Alcock, Emma
Dworakowski, Rafal
MacCarthy, Philip
Monaghan, Mark
Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
title Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
title_full Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
title_fullStr Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
title_full_unstemmed Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
title_short Is transnasal TEE imaging a viable alternative to conventional TEE during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? A pilot comparison study of image quality
title_sort is transnasal tee imaging a viable alternative to conventional tee during structural cardiac interventions to avoid general anaesthesia? a pilot comparison study of image quality
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28249937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-16-0029
work_keys_str_mv AT klettasdimitris istransnasalteeimagingaviablealternativetoconventionalteeduringstructuralcardiacinterventionstoavoidgeneralanaesthesiaapilotcomparisonstudyofimagequality
AT alcockemma istransnasalteeimagingaviablealternativetoconventionalteeduringstructuralcardiacinterventionstoavoidgeneralanaesthesiaapilotcomparisonstudyofimagequality
AT dworakowskirafal istransnasalteeimagingaviablealternativetoconventionalteeduringstructuralcardiacinterventionstoavoidgeneralanaesthesiaapilotcomparisonstudyofimagequality
AT maccarthyphilip istransnasalteeimagingaviablealternativetoconventionalteeduringstructuralcardiacinterventionstoavoidgeneralanaesthesiaapilotcomparisonstudyofimagequality
AT monaghanmark istransnasalteeimagingaviablealternativetoconventionalteeduringstructuralcardiacinterventionstoavoidgeneralanaesthesiaapilotcomparisonstudyofimagequality