Cargando…
Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491296 |
_version_ | 1783237303313891328 |
---|---|
author | Batula, Alyssa M. Mark, Jesse A. Kim, Youngmoo E. Ayaz, Hasan |
author_facet | Batula, Alyssa M. Mark, Jesse A. Kim, Youngmoo E. Ayaz, Hasan |
author_sort | Batula, Alyssa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions with no muscle movement, good candidates. This study explores cortical activation differences between motor imagery and motor execution for both upper and lower limbs using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Four simple finger- or toe-tapping tasks (left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot) were performed with both motor imagery and motor execution and compared to resting state. Significant activation was found during all four motor imagery tasks, indicating that they can be detected via fNIRS. Motor execution produced higher activation levels, a faster response, and a different spatial distribution compared to motor imagery, which should be taken into account when designing an imagery-based BCI. When comparing left versus right, upper limb tasks are the most clearly distinguishable, particularly during motor execution. Left and right lower limb activation patterns were found to be highly similar during both imagery and execution, indicating that higher resolution imaging, advanced signal processing, or improved subject training may be required to reliably distinguish them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5435907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54359072017-05-25 Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS Batula, Alyssa M. Mark, Jesse A. Kim, Youngmoo E. Ayaz, Hasan Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions with no muscle movement, good candidates. This study explores cortical activation differences between motor imagery and motor execution for both upper and lower limbs using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Four simple finger- or toe-tapping tasks (left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot) were performed with both motor imagery and motor execution and compared to resting state. Significant activation was found during all four motor imagery tasks, indicating that they can be detected via fNIRS. Motor execution produced higher activation levels, a faster response, and a different spatial distribution compared to motor imagery, which should be taken into account when designing an imagery-based BCI. When comparing left versus right, upper limb tasks are the most clearly distinguishable, particularly during motor execution. Left and right lower limb activation patterns were found to be highly similar during both imagery and execution, indicating that higher resolution imaging, advanced signal processing, or improved subject training may be required to reliably distinguish them. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5435907/ /pubmed/28546809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491296 Text en Copyright © 2017 Alyssa M. Batula et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Batula, Alyssa M. Mark, Jesse A. Kim, Youngmoo E. Ayaz, Hasan Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS |
title | Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS |
title_full | Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS |
title_short | Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS |
title_sort | comparison of brain activation during motor imagery and motor movement using fnirs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batulaalyssam comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs AT markjessea comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs AT kimyoungmooe comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs AT ayazhasan comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs |