Cargando…

Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS

Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batula, Alyssa M., Mark, Jesse A., Kim, Youngmoo E., Ayaz, Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491296
_version_ 1783237303313891328
author Batula, Alyssa M.
Mark, Jesse A.
Kim, Youngmoo E.
Ayaz, Hasan
author_facet Batula, Alyssa M.
Mark, Jesse A.
Kim, Youngmoo E.
Ayaz, Hasan
author_sort Batula, Alyssa M.
collection PubMed
description Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions with no muscle movement, good candidates. This study explores cortical activation differences between motor imagery and motor execution for both upper and lower limbs using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Four simple finger- or toe-tapping tasks (left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot) were performed with both motor imagery and motor execution and compared to resting state. Significant activation was found during all four motor imagery tasks, indicating that they can be detected via fNIRS. Motor execution produced higher activation levels, a faster response, and a different spatial distribution compared to motor imagery, which should be taken into account when designing an imagery-based BCI. When comparing left versus right, upper limb tasks are the most clearly distinguishable, particularly during motor execution. Left and right lower limb activation patterns were found to be highly similar during both imagery and execution, indicating that higher resolution imaging, advanced signal processing, or improved subject training may be required to reliably distinguish them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54359072017-05-25 Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS Batula, Alyssa M. Mark, Jesse A. Kim, Youngmoo E. Ayaz, Hasan Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions with no muscle movement, good candidates. This study explores cortical activation differences between motor imagery and motor execution for both upper and lower limbs using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Four simple finger- or toe-tapping tasks (left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot) were performed with both motor imagery and motor execution and compared to resting state. Significant activation was found during all four motor imagery tasks, indicating that they can be detected via fNIRS. Motor execution produced higher activation levels, a faster response, and a different spatial distribution compared to motor imagery, which should be taken into account when designing an imagery-based BCI. When comparing left versus right, upper limb tasks are the most clearly distinguishable, particularly during motor execution. Left and right lower limb activation patterns were found to be highly similar during both imagery and execution, indicating that higher resolution imaging, advanced signal processing, or improved subject training may be required to reliably distinguish them. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5435907/ /pubmed/28546809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491296 Text en Copyright © 2017 Alyssa M. Batula et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Batula, Alyssa M.
Mark, Jesse A.
Kim, Youngmoo E.
Ayaz, Hasan
Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
title Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
title_full Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
title_fullStr Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
title_short Comparison of Brain Activation during Motor Imagery and Motor Movement Using fNIRS
title_sort comparison of brain activation during motor imagery and motor movement using fnirs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491296
work_keys_str_mv AT batulaalyssam comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs
AT markjessea comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs
AT kimyoungmooe comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs
AT ayazhasan comparisonofbrainactivationduringmotorimageryandmotormovementusingfnirs