Cargando…

Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges

Gait disorders are major causes of falls in patients with neurological diseases. Understanding these disorders allows prevention and better insights into underlying diseases. InertiaLocoGraphy (ILG) –the quantification of gait by using inertial measurement units (IMUs) –shows great potential to addr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vienne, Aliénor, Barrois, Rémi P., Buffat, Stéphane, Ricard, Damien, Vidal, Pierre-Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00817
_version_ 1783237324552798208
author Vienne, Aliénor
Barrois, Rémi P.
Buffat, Stéphane
Ricard, Damien
Vidal, Pierre-Paul
author_facet Vienne, Aliénor
Barrois, Rémi P.
Buffat, Stéphane
Ricard, Damien
Vidal, Pierre-Paul
author_sort Vienne, Aliénor
collection PubMed
description Gait disorders are major causes of falls in patients with neurological diseases. Understanding these disorders allows prevention and better insights into underlying diseases. InertiaLocoGraphy (ILG) –the quantification of gait by using inertial measurement units (IMUs) –shows great potential to address this public health challenge, but protocols vary widely and normative values of gait parameters are still unavailable. This systematic review critically compares ILG protocols, questions features extracted from inertial signals and proposes a semeiological analysis of clinimetric characteristics for use in neurological clinical routine. For this systematic review, PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched for articles assessing gait quality by using IMUs that were published from January 1, 2014 to August 31, 2016. ILG was used to assess gait in a wide range of neurological disorders – including Parkinson disease, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer disease, cerebral palsy, and cerebellar atrophy – as well as in the faller or frail older population and in people presenting rheumatological pathologies. However, results have not yet been driving changes in clinical practice. One reason could be that studies mainly aimed at comparing pathological gait to healthy gait, but there is stronger need for semiological descriptions of gait perturbation, severity or prognostic assessment. Furthermore, protocols used to assess gait using IMUs are too many. Likely, outcomes are highly heterogeneous and difficult to compare across large panels of studies. Therefore, homogenization is needed to foster the use of ILG to assess gait quality in neurological routine practice. The pros and cons of each protocol are emphasized so that a compromise can be reached. As well, analysis of seven complementary clinical criteria (springiness, sturdiness, smoothness, steadiness, stability, symmetry, synchronization) is advocated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5435996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54359962017-06-01 Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges Vienne, Aliénor Barrois, Rémi P. Buffat, Stéphane Ricard, Damien Vidal, Pierre-Paul Front Psychol Psychology Gait disorders are major causes of falls in patients with neurological diseases. Understanding these disorders allows prevention and better insights into underlying diseases. InertiaLocoGraphy (ILG) –the quantification of gait by using inertial measurement units (IMUs) –shows great potential to address this public health challenge, but protocols vary widely and normative values of gait parameters are still unavailable. This systematic review critically compares ILG protocols, questions features extracted from inertial signals and proposes a semeiological analysis of clinimetric characteristics for use in neurological clinical routine. For this systematic review, PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched for articles assessing gait quality by using IMUs that were published from January 1, 2014 to August 31, 2016. ILG was used to assess gait in a wide range of neurological disorders – including Parkinson disease, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer disease, cerebral palsy, and cerebellar atrophy – as well as in the faller or frail older population and in people presenting rheumatological pathologies. However, results have not yet been driving changes in clinical practice. One reason could be that studies mainly aimed at comparing pathological gait to healthy gait, but there is stronger need for semiological descriptions of gait perturbation, severity or prognostic assessment. Furthermore, protocols used to assess gait using IMUs are too many. Likely, outcomes are highly heterogeneous and difficult to compare across large panels of studies. Therefore, homogenization is needed to foster the use of ILG to assess gait quality in neurological routine practice. The pros and cons of each protocol are emphasized so that a compromise can be reached. As well, analysis of seven complementary clinical criteria (springiness, sturdiness, smoothness, steadiness, stability, symmetry, synchronization) is advocated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5435996/ /pubmed/28572784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00817 Text en Copyright © 2017 Vienne, Barrois, Buffat, Ricard and Vidal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Vienne, Aliénor
Barrois, Rémi P.
Buffat, Stéphane
Ricard, Damien
Vidal, Pierre-Paul
Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges
title Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges
title_full Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges
title_fullStr Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges
title_short Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait Quality in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Technical and Analytical Challenges
title_sort inertial sensors to assess gait quality in patients with neurological disorders: a systematic review of technical and analytical challenges
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00817
work_keys_str_mv AT viennealienor inertialsensorstoassessgaitqualityinpatientswithneurologicaldisordersasystematicreviewoftechnicalandanalyticalchallenges
AT barroisremip inertialsensorstoassessgaitqualityinpatientswithneurologicaldisordersasystematicreviewoftechnicalandanalyticalchallenges
AT buffatstephane inertialsensorstoassessgaitqualityinpatientswithneurologicaldisordersasystematicreviewoftechnicalandanalyticalchallenges
AT ricarddamien inertialsensorstoassessgaitqualityinpatientswithneurologicaldisordersasystematicreviewoftechnicalandanalyticalchallenges
AT vidalpierrepaul inertialsensorstoassessgaitqualityinpatientswithneurologicaldisordersasystematicreviewoftechnicalandanalyticalchallenges