Cargando…

Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer

Purpose: Previous studies addressing the optimal nodal staging system in patients with resected gastric cancer have shown inconsistent results, and the optimal system for development of prognostic nomograms remains unclear. In this study, we compared prognostic nomograms based on the metastatic lymp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zi-Xian, Qiu, Miao-Zhen, Jiang, Yu-Ming, Zhou, Zhi-Wei, Li, Guo-Xin, Xu, Rui-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529606
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.17370
_version_ 1783237362472452096
author Wang, Zi-Xian
Qiu, Miao-Zhen
Jiang, Yu-Ming
Zhou, Zhi-Wei
Li, Guo-Xin
Xu, Rui-Hua
author_facet Wang, Zi-Xian
Qiu, Miao-Zhen
Jiang, Yu-Ming
Zhou, Zhi-Wei
Li, Guo-Xin
Xu, Rui-Hua
author_sort Wang, Zi-Xian
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Previous studies addressing the optimal nodal staging system in patients with resected gastric cancer have shown inconsistent results, and the optimal system for development of prognostic nomograms remains unclear. In this study, we compared prognostic nomograms based on the metastatic lymph node (MLN) count, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) to predict the 5-year overall survival in patients with resected gastric cancer. Methods: We analysed 15,320 patients with resected gastric cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2010. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. When assessed as a continuous covariate with restricted cubic splines, each MLN, LNR, and LODDS variable was incorporated into a nomogram with other significant prognosticators to predict the 5-year overall survival. A two-centre Chinese dataset (1,595 cases) was used as external validation data. Results: The discriminatory abilities of the MLN-, LNR-, and LODDS-based nomograms were comparable (concordance indices: 0.744, 0.741, and 0.744, respectively, in the SEER set, P > 0.152 for all pairwise comparisons; 0.715, 0.712, and 0.713, respectively, in the Chinese set, P > 0.445 for all pairwise comparisons). The discriminatory abilities of the three nomograms were all superior to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification (concordance indices: 0.713, P < 0.001 for all in the SEER set; and 0.693, P < 0.001 for all in the Chinese set). The discriminatory abilities of the nomograms were comparable regardless of the number of nodes examined. Moreover, decision curve analyses indicated similar net benefits of using the nomograms. Conclusion: MLN-, LNR-, and LODDS should be considered equally in the development of multivariate prognostic models and nomograms to refine the prediction of survival among patients with resected gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5436246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54362462017-05-19 Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer Wang, Zi-Xian Qiu, Miao-Zhen Jiang, Yu-Ming Zhou, Zhi-Wei Li, Guo-Xin Xu, Rui-Hua J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: Previous studies addressing the optimal nodal staging system in patients with resected gastric cancer have shown inconsistent results, and the optimal system for development of prognostic nomograms remains unclear. In this study, we compared prognostic nomograms based on the metastatic lymph node (MLN) count, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) to predict the 5-year overall survival in patients with resected gastric cancer. Methods: We analysed 15,320 patients with resected gastric cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2010. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. When assessed as a continuous covariate with restricted cubic splines, each MLN, LNR, and LODDS variable was incorporated into a nomogram with other significant prognosticators to predict the 5-year overall survival. A two-centre Chinese dataset (1,595 cases) was used as external validation data. Results: The discriminatory abilities of the MLN-, LNR-, and LODDS-based nomograms were comparable (concordance indices: 0.744, 0.741, and 0.744, respectively, in the SEER set, P > 0.152 for all pairwise comparisons; 0.715, 0.712, and 0.713, respectively, in the Chinese set, P > 0.445 for all pairwise comparisons). The discriminatory abilities of the three nomograms were all superior to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification (concordance indices: 0.713, P < 0.001 for all in the SEER set; and 0.693, P < 0.001 for all in the Chinese set). The discriminatory abilities of the nomograms were comparable regardless of the number of nodes examined. Moreover, decision curve analyses indicated similar net benefits of using the nomograms. Conclusion: MLN-, LNR-, and LODDS should be considered equally in the development of multivariate prognostic models and nomograms to refine the prediction of survival among patients with resected gastric cancer. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5436246/ /pubmed/28529606 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.17370 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Wang, Zi-Xian
Qiu, Miao-Zhen
Jiang, Yu-Ming
Zhou, Zhi-Wei
Li, Guo-Xin
Xu, Rui-Hua
Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
title Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
title_full Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
title_short Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
title_sort comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529606
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.17370
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzixian comparisonofprognosticnomogramsbasedondifferentnodalstagingsystemsinpatientswithresectedgastriccancer
AT qiumiaozhen comparisonofprognosticnomogramsbasedondifferentnodalstagingsystemsinpatientswithresectedgastriccancer
AT jiangyuming comparisonofprognosticnomogramsbasedondifferentnodalstagingsystemsinpatientswithresectedgastriccancer
AT zhouzhiwei comparisonofprognosticnomogramsbasedondifferentnodalstagingsystemsinpatientswithresectedgastriccancer
AT liguoxin comparisonofprognosticnomogramsbasedondifferentnodalstagingsystemsinpatientswithresectedgastriccancer
AT xuruihua comparisonofprognosticnomogramsbasedondifferentnodalstagingsystemsinpatientswithresectedgastriccancer