Cargando…
Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate two generations of intramedullary gamma-nail used in the treatment of 31-A femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two consecutive series, 117 trochanteric gamma nails (TGN) and 100 Gamma3 nails (G3N) were implanted for the treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001610010389 |
_version_ | 1783237391813705728 |
---|---|
author | Schupfner, R. Käsmann, L.T. Wagner, W. Schulz, A.P. |
author_facet | Schupfner, R. Käsmann, L.T. Wagner, W. Schulz, A.P. |
author_sort | Schupfner, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate two generations of intramedullary gamma-nail used in the treatment of 31-A femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two consecutive series, 117 trochanteric gamma nails (TGN) and 100 Gamma3 nails (G3N) were implanted for the treatment of inter- and subtrochanteric fractures between 2009 and 2011. Clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were assessed. An analysis of surgical time, hemoglobin drop and complications were performed. RESULTS: Average surgical time, fluoroscopy time, haemoglobin drop and length-of-stay (LOS) were similar in both groups. No significant differences were found in surgery-related complications like wound hematomas (p=0,59), abscesses (p=0,38), wound infections (p=0,69) and Cut-outs (p=0,69) between the two groups. The cumulative surgery-related complication rate was higher in the TGN group compared to the G3N group (13,68% vs. 8%) but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0,2). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both TGN and G3N allow adequate treatment of trochanteric fractures with an acceptable complication rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5436381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54363812017-05-18 Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases Schupfner, R. Käsmann, L.T. Wagner, W. Schulz, A.P. Open Orthop J Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate two generations of intramedullary gamma-nail used in the treatment of 31-A femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two consecutive series, 117 trochanteric gamma nails (TGN) and 100 Gamma3 nails (G3N) were implanted for the treatment of inter- and subtrochanteric fractures between 2009 and 2011. Clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were assessed. An analysis of surgical time, hemoglobin drop and complications were performed. RESULTS: Average surgical time, fluoroscopy time, haemoglobin drop and length-of-stay (LOS) were similar in both groups. No significant differences were found in surgery-related complications like wound hematomas (p=0,59), abscesses (p=0,38), wound infections (p=0,69) and Cut-outs (p=0,69) between the two groups. The cumulative surgery-related complication rate was higher in the TGN group compared to the G3N group (13,68% vs. 8%) but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0,2). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both TGN and G3N allow adequate treatment of trochanteric fractures with an acceptable complication rate. Bentham Open 2016-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5436381/ /pubmed/28523080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001610010389 Text en © Schupfner et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Schupfner, R. Käsmann, L.T. Wagner, W. Schulz, A.P. Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases |
title | Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases |
title_full | Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases |
title_fullStr | Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases |
title_short | Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases |
title_sort | complications in treatment of 31-a fractures with trochanteric gamma nail (tgn) versus gamma3 nail (g3n) - a review of 217 cases |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001610010389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schupfnerr complicationsintreatmentof31afractureswithtrochantericgammanailtgnversusgamma3nailg3nareviewof217cases AT kasmannlt complicationsintreatmentof31afractureswithtrochantericgammanailtgnversusgamma3nailg3nareviewof217cases AT wagnerw complicationsintreatmentof31afractureswithtrochantericgammanailtgnversusgamma3nailg3nareviewof217cases AT schulzap complicationsintreatmentof31afractureswithtrochantericgammanailtgnversusgamma3nailg3nareviewof217cases |