Cargando…
Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
Antimicrobial agents are used in cattle production systems for the prevention and control of bacterial associated diseases. A consequence of their use is the potential development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis that are resistant to antimicrobials a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177728 |
_version_ | 1783237459216171008 |
---|---|
author | Barlow, Robert S. McMillan, Kate E. Duffy, Lesley L. Fegan, Narelle Jordan, David Mellor, Glen E. |
author_facet | Barlow, Robert S. McMillan, Kate E. Duffy, Lesley L. Fegan, Narelle Jordan, David Mellor, Glen E. |
author_sort | Barlow, Robert S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial agents are used in cattle production systems for the prevention and control of bacterial associated diseases. A consequence of their use is the potential development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis that are resistant to antimicrobials are of increased concern to public health officials throughout the world as they may compromise the ability of various treatment regimens to control disease and infection in human medicine. Australia is a major exporter of beef; however it does not have an ongoing surveillance system for AMR in cattle or foods derived from these animals. This study examined 910 beef cattle, 290 dairy cattle and 300 veal calf faecal samples collected at slaughter for the presence of enterococci. Enterococcus were isolated from 805 (88.5%) beef cattle faeces, 244 (84.1%) dairy cattle faeces and 247 (82.3%) veal calf faeces with a total of 800 enterococci subsequently selected for AMR testing. The results of AMR testing identified high levels of resistance to antimicrobials that are not critically or highly important to human medicine with resistance to flavomycin (80.2%) and lincomycin (85.4–94.2%) routinely observed. Conversely, resistance to antibiotics considered critically or highly important to human medicine such as tigecycline, daptomycin, vancomycin and linezolid was not present in this study. There is minimal evidence that Australian cattle production practices are responsible for disproportionate contributions to AMR development and in general resistance to antimicrobials of critical and high importance in human medicine was low regardless of the isolate source. The low level of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus from Australian cattle is likely to result from comprehensive controls around the use of antimicrobials in food-production animals in Australia. Nevertheless, continued monitoring of the effects of all antimicrobial use is required to support Australia’s reputation as a supplier of safe and healthy food. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5436749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54367492017-05-27 Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter Barlow, Robert S. McMillan, Kate E. Duffy, Lesley L. Fegan, Narelle Jordan, David Mellor, Glen E. PLoS One Research Article Antimicrobial agents are used in cattle production systems for the prevention and control of bacterial associated diseases. A consequence of their use is the potential development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis that are resistant to antimicrobials are of increased concern to public health officials throughout the world as they may compromise the ability of various treatment regimens to control disease and infection in human medicine. Australia is a major exporter of beef; however it does not have an ongoing surveillance system for AMR in cattle or foods derived from these animals. This study examined 910 beef cattle, 290 dairy cattle and 300 veal calf faecal samples collected at slaughter for the presence of enterococci. Enterococcus were isolated from 805 (88.5%) beef cattle faeces, 244 (84.1%) dairy cattle faeces and 247 (82.3%) veal calf faeces with a total of 800 enterococci subsequently selected for AMR testing. The results of AMR testing identified high levels of resistance to antimicrobials that are not critically or highly important to human medicine with resistance to flavomycin (80.2%) and lincomycin (85.4–94.2%) routinely observed. Conversely, resistance to antibiotics considered critically or highly important to human medicine such as tigecycline, daptomycin, vancomycin and linezolid was not present in this study. There is minimal evidence that Australian cattle production practices are responsible for disproportionate contributions to AMR development and in general resistance to antimicrobials of critical and high importance in human medicine was low regardless of the isolate source. The low level of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus from Australian cattle is likely to result from comprehensive controls around the use of antimicrobials in food-production animals in Australia. Nevertheless, continued monitoring of the effects of all antimicrobial use is required to support Australia’s reputation as a supplier of safe and healthy food. Public Library of Science 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5436749/ /pubmed/28542602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177728 Text en © 2017 Barlow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barlow, Robert S. McMillan, Kate E. Duffy, Lesley L. Fegan, Narelle Jordan, David Mellor, Glen E. Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter |
title | Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter |
title_full | Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter |
title_short | Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter |
title_sort | antimicrobial resistance status of enterococcus from australian cattle populations at slaughter |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barlowroberts antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter AT mcmillankatee antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter AT duffylesleyl antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter AT fegannarelle antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter AT jordandavid antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter AT mellorglene antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter |