Cargando…

Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter

Antimicrobial agents are used in cattle production systems for the prevention and control of bacterial associated diseases. A consequence of their use is the potential development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis that are resistant to antimicrobials a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barlow, Robert S., McMillan, Kate E., Duffy, Lesley L., Fegan, Narelle, Jordan, David, Mellor, Glen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177728
_version_ 1783237459216171008
author Barlow, Robert S.
McMillan, Kate E.
Duffy, Lesley L.
Fegan, Narelle
Jordan, David
Mellor, Glen E.
author_facet Barlow, Robert S.
McMillan, Kate E.
Duffy, Lesley L.
Fegan, Narelle
Jordan, David
Mellor, Glen E.
author_sort Barlow, Robert S.
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial agents are used in cattle production systems for the prevention and control of bacterial associated diseases. A consequence of their use is the potential development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis that are resistant to antimicrobials are of increased concern to public health officials throughout the world as they may compromise the ability of various treatment regimens to control disease and infection in human medicine. Australia is a major exporter of beef; however it does not have an ongoing surveillance system for AMR in cattle or foods derived from these animals. This study examined 910 beef cattle, 290 dairy cattle and 300 veal calf faecal samples collected at slaughter for the presence of enterococci. Enterococcus were isolated from 805 (88.5%) beef cattle faeces, 244 (84.1%) dairy cattle faeces and 247 (82.3%) veal calf faeces with a total of 800 enterococci subsequently selected for AMR testing. The results of AMR testing identified high levels of resistance to antimicrobials that are not critically or highly important to human medicine with resistance to flavomycin (80.2%) and lincomycin (85.4–94.2%) routinely observed. Conversely, resistance to antibiotics considered critically or highly important to human medicine such as tigecycline, daptomycin, vancomycin and linezolid was not present in this study. There is minimal evidence that Australian cattle production practices are responsible for disproportionate contributions to AMR development and in general resistance to antimicrobials of critical and high importance in human medicine was low regardless of the isolate source. The low level of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus from Australian cattle is likely to result from comprehensive controls around the use of antimicrobials in food-production animals in Australia. Nevertheless, continued monitoring of the effects of all antimicrobial use is required to support Australia’s reputation as a supplier of safe and healthy food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5436749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54367492017-05-27 Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter Barlow, Robert S. McMillan, Kate E. Duffy, Lesley L. Fegan, Narelle Jordan, David Mellor, Glen E. PLoS One Research Article Antimicrobial agents are used in cattle production systems for the prevention and control of bacterial associated diseases. A consequence of their use is the potential development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis that are resistant to antimicrobials are of increased concern to public health officials throughout the world as they may compromise the ability of various treatment regimens to control disease and infection in human medicine. Australia is a major exporter of beef; however it does not have an ongoing surveillance system for AMR in cattle or foods derived from these animals. This study examined 910 beef cattle, 290 dairy cattle and 300 veal calf faecal samples collected at slaughter for the presence of enterococci. Enterococcus were isolated from 805 (88.5%) beef cattle faeces, 244 (84.1%) dairy cattle faeces and 247 (82.3%) veal calf faeces with a total of 800 enterococci subsequently selected for AMR testing. The results of AMR testing identified high levels of resistance to antimicrobials that are not critically or highly important to human medicine with resistance to flavomycin (80.2%) and lincomycin (85.4–94.2%) routinely observed. Conversely, resistance to antibiotics considered critically or highly important to human medicine such as tigecycline, daptomycin, vancomycin and linezolid was not present in this study. There is minimal evidence that Australian cattle production practices are responsible for disproportionate contributions to AMR development and in general resistance to antimicrobials of critical and high importance in human medicine was low regardless of the isolate source. The low level of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus from Australian cattle is likely to result from comprehensive controls around the use of antimicrobials in food-production animals in Australia. Nevertheless, continued monitoring of the effects of all antimicrobial use is required to support Australia’s reputation as a supplier of safe and healthy food. Public Library of Science 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5436749/ /pubmed/28542602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177728 Text en © 2017 Barlow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barlow, Robert S.
McMillan, Kate E.
Duffy, Lesley L.
Fegan, Narelle
Jordan, David
Mellor, Glen E.
Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
title Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
title_full Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
title_short Antimicrobial resistance status of Enterococcus from Australian cattle populations at slaughter
title_sort antimicrobial resistance status of enterococcus from australian cattle populations at slaughter
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177728
work_keys_str_mv AT barlowroberts antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter
AT mcmillankatee antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter
AT duffylesleyl antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter
AT fegannarelle antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter
AT jordandavid antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter
AT mellorglene antimicrobialresistancestatusofenterococcusfromaustraliancattlepopulationsatslaughter