Cargando…
Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
BACKGROUND: Topical anesthesia is used to control pain associated with many procedures in medicine. Today, the product most commonly applied for topical anesthesia in Germany is EMLA(®) (lidocaine/prilocaine). However, since prilocaine is a methemoglobin-inducing agent, there are limitations to its...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546768 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S131029 |
_version_ | 1783237460452442112 |
---|---|
author | Weilbach, Christian Hoppe, Christian Karst, Matthias Winterhalter, Michael Raymondos, Konstantinos Schultz, Arthur Rahe-Meyer, Niels |
author_facet | Weilbach, Christian Hoppe, Christian Karst, Matthias Winterhalter, Michael Raymondos, Konstantinos Schultz, Arthur Rahe-Meyer, Niels |
author_sort | Weilbach, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Topical anesthesia is used to control pain associated with many procedures in medicine. Today, the product most commonly applied for topical anesthesia in Germany is EMLA(®) (lidocaine/prilocaine). However, since prilocaine is a methemoglobin-inducing agent, there are limitations to its use, especially in neonates and infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prilocaine and lidocaine as well as propylene glycol, a penetration enhancer, and trometamol, a buffer substance, in anesthetic creams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy adults participated in this study. Standardized creams with eight different compositions were applied and left for 20, 40 or 60 min. After exposure to standardized painful stimuli (blunt/sharp with pressures of 0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 N), subjects rated the experimental pain using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Significant results were only found with an exposure time of 60 min and a stamp pressure of 0.8 N. At a concentration of 20%, lidocaine was more effective compared to placebo and equally effective compared to lidocaine/prilocaine in controlling pain. The analgesic effect of the cream containing lidocaine 10% and additional trometamol was significantly superior to that of placebo and non-inferior to that of lidocaine/prilocaine. In this study, the penetration enhancer propylene glycol did not accelerate the onset of the analgesic effect. In contrast, the addition of trometamol (Tris/THAM) accelerated the onset of the effect compared to the native formulation (at 0.4 and 0.8 N). In all of the adult subjects of this study, the minimum exposure time was 60 min for any of the tested topical anesthetic creams. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that a cream containing 20% lidocaine, 38% trometamol and 10% propylene glycol may be used as an alternative to lidocaine/prilocaine with a comparable effect and without the need to extend exposure time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5436754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54367542017-05-25 Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Weilbach, Christian Hoppe, Christian Karst, Matthias Winterhalter, Michael Raymondos, Konstantinos Schultz, Arthur Rahe-Meyer, Niels J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Topical anesthesia is used to control pain associated with many procedures in medicine. Today, the product most commonly applied for topical anesthesia in Germany is EMLA(®) (lidocaine/prilocaine). However, since prilocaine is a methemoglobin-inducing agent, there are limitations to its use, especially in neonates and infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prilocaine and lidocaine as well as propylene glycol, a penetration enhancer, and trometamol, a buffer substance, in anesthetic creams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy adults participated in this study. Standardized creams with eight different compositions were applied and left for 20, 40 or 60 min. After exposure to standardized painful stimuli (blunt/sharp with pressures of 0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 N), subjects rated the experimental pain using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Significant results were only found with an exposure time of 60 min and a stamp pressure of 0.8 N. At a concentration of 20%, lidocaine was more effective compared to placebo and equally effective compared to lidocaine/prilocaine in controlling pain. The analgesic effect of the cream containing lidocaine 10% and additional trometamol was significantly superior to that of placebo and non-inferior to that of lidocaine/prilocaine. In this study, the penetration enhancer propylene glycol did not accelerate the onset of the analgesic effect. In contrast, the addition of trometamol (Tris/THAM) accelerated the onset of the effect compared to the native formulation (at 0.4 and 0.8 N). In all of the adult subjects of this study, the minimum exposure time was 60 min for any of the tested topical anesthetic creams. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that a cream containing 20% lidocaine, 38% trometamol and 10% propylene glycol may be used as an alternative to lidocaine/prilocaine with a comparable effect and without the need to extend exposure time. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5436754/ /pubmed/28546768 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S131029 Text en © 2017 Weilbach et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Weilbach, Christian Hoppe, Christian Karst, Matthias Winterhalter, Michael Raymondos, Konstantinos Schultz, Arthur Rahe-Meyer, Niels Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
title | Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
title_full | Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
title_short | Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
title_sort | effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546768 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S131029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weilbachchristian effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT hoppechristian effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT karstmatthias effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT winterhaltermichael effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT raymondoskonstantinos effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT schultzarthur effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT rahemeyerniels effectivenessofvariousformulationsoflocalanestheticsandadditivesfortopicalanesthesiaaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy |