Cargando…
Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile
BACKGROUND: Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) is a new and revolutionary identification method for microorganisms and has recently been introduced into clinical microbiology in many industrialized countries in Europe and North America. OBJE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177929 |
_version_ | 1783237478896893952 |
---|---|
author | Porte, Lorena García, Patricia Braun, Stephanie Ulloa, María Teresa Lafourcade, Mónica Montaña, Alisson Miranda, Carolina Acosta-Jamett, Gerardo Weitzel, Thomas |
author_facet | Porte, Lorena García, Patricia Braun, Stephanie Ulloa, María Teresa Lafourcade, Mónica Montaña, Alisson Miranda, Carolina Acosta-Jamett, Gerardo Weitzel, Thomas |
author_sort | Porte, Lorena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) is a new and revolutionary identification method for microorganisms and has recently been introduced into clinical microbiology in many industrialized countries in Europe and North America. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to compare the performance and practicality of two commercial MALDI-TOF MS platforms in a head-to head manner at a routine laboratory in Chile. METHODS: During a five-month period in 2012–13, the diagnostic efficiency (correct identification rate) and agreement between Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics) and Vitek MS (bioMérieux) was compared in a parallel manner to conventional identification including genotypic analysis for difficult-to-identify strains. The study included 804 microbial isolates: 252 Enterobacteriaceae, 126 non-fermenters, 36 other gram-negative rods, 279 gram-positive cocci, 32 gram-positive rods, 32 anaerobes, and 47 yeasts. Other relevant factors of the two devices such as user friendliness and connectivity were also evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Both systems correctly identified the vast majority (98%) of the isolates to the genus level. Vitek MS reached higher rates of identification to species and species complex level than Microflex LT (81% vs. 85% and 87% vs. 93%, respectively), which was mainly based on the higher performance among coagulase negative staphylococci and Candida isolates. The evaluation of user friendliness and other technical aspects showed only marginal differences, which slightly favored Vitek MS, mainly due to its ready-to-use supplies, easier connectivity and workflow integration, and availability of local technical support. CONCLUSIONS: Both MALDI-TOF MS systems permitted fast and accurate identification of most microbial strains and showed a high level of user-friendliness. The observed differences were marginal and slightly favored Vitek MS, mainly due to practicality and connectivity issues within our setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5436840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54368402017-05-27 Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile Porte, Lorena García, Patricia Braun, Stephanie Ulloa, María Teresa Lafourcade, Mónica Montaña, Alisson Miranda, Carolina Acosta-Jamett, Gerardo Weitzel, Thomas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) is a new and revolutionary identification method for microorganisms and has recently been introduced into clinical microbiology in many industrialized countries in Europe and North America. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to compare the performance and practicality of two commercial MALDI-TOF MS platforms in a head-to head manner at a routine laboratory in Chile. METHODS: During a five-month period in 2012–13, the diagnostic efficiency (correct identification rate) and agreement between Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics) and Vitek MS (bioMérieux) was compared in a parallel manner to conventional identification including genotypic analysis for difficult-to-identify strains. The study included 804 microbial isolates: 252 Enterobacteriaceae, 126 non-fermenters, 36 other gram-negative rods, 279 gram-positive cocci, 32 gram-positive rods, 32 anaerobes, and 47 yeasts. Other relevant factors of the two devices such as user friendliness and connectivity were also evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Both systems correctly identified the vast majority (98%) of the isolates to the genus level. Vitek MS reached higher rates of identification to species and species complex level than Microflex LT (81% vs. 85% and 87% vs. 93%, respectively), which was mainly based on the higher performance among coagulase negative staphylococci and Candida isolates. The evaluation of user friendliness and other technical aspects showed only marginal differences, which slightly favored Vitek MS, mainly due to its ready-to-use supplies, easier connectivity and workflow integration, and availability of local technical support. CONCLUSIONS: Both MALDI-TOF MS systems permitted fast and accurate identification of most microbial strains and showed a high level of user-friendliness. The observed differences were marginal and slightly favored Vitek MS, mainly due to practicality and connectivity issues within our setting. Public Library of Science 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5436840/ /pubmed/28542393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177929 Text en © 2017 Porte et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Porte, Lorena García, Patricia Braun, Stephanie Ulloa, María Teresa Lafourcade, Mónica Montaña, Alisson Miranda, Carolina Acosta-Jamett, Gerardo Weitzel, Thomas Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile |
title | Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile |
title_full | Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile |
title_fullStr | Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile |
title_full_unstemmed | Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile |
title_short | Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile |
title_sort | head-to-head comparison of microflex lt and vitek ms systems for routine identification of microorganisms by maldi-tof mass spectrometry in chile |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT portelorena headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT garciapatricia headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT braunstephanie headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT ulloamariateresa headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT lafourcademonica headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT montanaalisson headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT mirandacarolina headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT acostajamettgerardo headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile AT weitzelthomas headtoheadcomparisonofmicroflexltandvitekmssystemsforroutineidentificationofmicroorganismsbymalditofmassspectrometryinchile |