Cargando…
Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study
We describe the methodology and results from our validation study of the fully automated antibody structure prediction tool available in the BIOVIA (formerly Accelrys) protein modeling suite. Extending our previous study, we have validated the automated approach using a larger and more diverse data...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177923 |
_version_ | 1783237480884994048 |
---|---|
author | Kemmish, Helen Fasnacht, Marc Yan, Lisa |
author_facet | Kemmish, Helen Fasnacht, Marc Yan, Lisa |
author_sort | Kemmish, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | We describe the methodology and results from our validation study of the fully automated antibody structure prediction tool available in the BIOVIA (formerly Accelrys) protein modeling suite. Extending our previous study, we have validated the automated approach using a larger and more diverse data set (157 unique antibody Fv domains versus 11 in the previous study). In the current study, we explore the effect of varying several parameter settings in order to better understand their influence on the resulting model quality. Specifically, we investigated the dependence on different methods of framework model construction, antibody numbering schemes (Chothia, IMGT, Honegger and Kabat), the influence of compatibility of loop templates using canonical type filtering, wider exploration of model solution space, and others. Our results show that our recently introduced Top5 framework modeling method results in a small but significant improvement in model quality whereas the effect of other parameters is not significant. Our analysis provides improved guidelines of best practices for using our protocol to build antibody structures. We also identify some limitations of the current computational model which will enhance proper evaluation of model quality by users and suggests possible future enhancements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5436848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54368482017-05-27 Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study Kemmish, Helen Fasnacht, Marc Yan, Lisa PLoS One Research Article We describe the methodology and results from our validation study of the fully automated antibody structure prediction tool available in the BIOVIA (formerly Accelrys) protein modeling suite. Extending our previous study, we have validated the automated approach using a larger and more diverse data set (157 unique antibody Fv domains versus 11 in the previous study). In the current study, we explore the effect of varying several parameter settings in order to better understand their influence on the resulting model quality. Specifically, we investigated the dependence on different methods of framework model construction, antibody numbering schemes (Chothia, IMGT, Honegger and Kabat), the influence of compatibility of loop templates using canonical type filtering, wider exploration of model solution space, and others. Our results show that our recently introduced Top5 framework modeling method results in a small but significant improvement in model quality whereas the effect of other parameters is not significant. Our analysis provides improved guidelines of best practices for using our protocol to build antibody structures. We also identify some limitations of the current computational model which will enhance proper evaluation of model quality by users and suggests possible future enhancements. Public Library of Science 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5436848/ /pubmed/28542300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177923 Text en © 2017 Kemmish et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kemmish, Helen Fasnacht, Marc Yan, Lisa Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study |
title | Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study |
title_full | Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study |
title_fullStr | Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study |
title_short | Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study |
title_sort | fully automated antibody structure prediction using biovia tools: validation study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5436848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kemmishhelen fullyautomatedantibodystructurepredictionusingbioviatoolsvalidationstudy AT fasnachtmarc fullyautomatedantibodystructurepredictionusingbioviatoolsvalidationstudy AT yanlisa fullyautomatedantibodystructurepredictionusingbioviatoolsvalidationstudy |