Cargando…

A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and costly disorders worldwide. To reduce its burden in the Netherlands, implementation of a multidisciplinary guideline for LBP was supported by a multifaceted eHealth campaign for patients with LBP. The current study aims 1) to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suman, Arnela, Schaafsma, Frederieke G., Bamarni, Jiman, van Tulder, Maurits W., Anema, Johannes R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28521761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1551-z
_version_ 1783237580911804416
author Suman, Arnela
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
Bamarni, Jiman
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Anema, Johannes R.
author_facet Suman, Arnela
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
Bamarni, Jiman
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Anema, Johannes R.
author_sort Suman, Arnela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and costly disorders worldwide. To reduce its burden in the Netherlands, implementation of a multidisciplinary guideline for LBP was supported by a multifaceted eHealth campaign for patients with LBP. The current study aims 1) to evaluate whether the implementation strategy was performed as planned; 2) to assess the feasibility, barriers and facilitators of the patient based eHealth campaign; 3) to gain insight into the satisfaction and experiences of patients with various ethnic backgrounds with the implementation strategy and to make a comparison between them; and 4) to explore the association between exposure to and satisfaction with the implementation strategy. METHODS: This process evaluation was performed using the Linnan and Steckler framework, and used a mixed methods approach for data collection and analysis. The relationship between satisfaction of patients and exposure to the strategy was statistically examined. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative data analysis methods. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen patients participated in the quantitative, and 44 in the qualitative analysis. Most were female and had a high level of education. Many patients did not use the campaign at all or only once, and those that did rated it as reasonable. Patient satisfaction with the campaign increased significantly with an increase in its use. Qualitative analysis showed that four main themes played a role in campaign rating and use: satisfaction with intervention components, perceived benefits of the intervention, usage of the intervention, and satisfaction with the medium used. CONCLUSION: This process evaluation showed that the eHealth campaign was used only by a small proportion of patients with non-specific LBP. It seemed that the campaign was offered to the patients too late, that the lay-out of the campaign did not meet patient needs, and that healthcare providers rarely discussed the campaign with their patients, while involvement of those providers seemed to improve trustworthiness of the campaign and increase its usage. It is important to invest effort into healthcare providers to motivate patients to use eHealth intervention and to tailor strategies better to the needs of users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4329. Registered December 20th, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5437407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54374072017-05-19 A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation Suman, Arnela Schaafsma, Frederieke G. Bamarni, Jiman van Tulder, Maurits W. Anema, Johannes R. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and costly disorders worldwide. To reduce its burden in the Netherlands, implementation of a multidisciplinary guideline for LBP was supported by a multifaceted eHealth campaign for patients with LBP. The current study aims 1) to evaluate whether the implementation strategy was performed as planned; 2) to assess the feasibility, barriers and facilitators of the patient based eHealth campaign; 3) to gain insight into the satisfaction and experiences of patients with various ethnic backgrounds with the implementation strategy and to make a comparison between them; and 4) to explore the association between exposure to and satisfaction with the implementation strategy. METHODS: This process evaluation was performed using the Linnan and Steckler framework, and used a mixed methods approach for data collection and analysis. The relationship between satisfaction of patients and exposure to the strategy was statistically examined. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative data analysis methods. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen patients participated in the quantitative, and 44 in the qualitative analysis. Most were female and had a high level of education. Many patients did not use the campaign at all or only once, and those that did rated it as reasonable. Patient satisfaction with the campaign increased significantly with an increase in its use. Qualitative analysis showed that four main themes played a role in campaign rating and use: satisfaction with intervention components, perceived benefits of the intervention, usage of the intervention, and satisfaction with the medium used. CONCLUSION: This process evaluation showed that the eHealth campaign was used only by a small proportion of patients with non-specific LBP. It seemed that the campaign was offered to the patients too late, that the lay-out of the campaign did not meet patient needs, and that healthcare providers rarely discussed the campaign with their patients, while involvement of those providers seemed to improve trustworthiness of the campaign and increase its usage. It is important to invest effort into healthcare providers to motivate patients to use eHealth intervention and to tailor strategies better to the needs of users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4329. Registered December 20th, 2013. BioMed Central 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5437407/ /pubmed/28521761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1551-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suman, Arnela
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
Bamarni, Jiman
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Anema, Johannes R.
A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
title A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
title_full A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
title_fullStr A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
title_short A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
title_sort multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28521761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1551-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sumanarnela amultimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT schaafsmafrederiekeg amultimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT bamarnijiman amultimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT vantuldermauritsw amultimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT anemajohannesr amultimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT sumanarnela multimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT schaafsmafrederiekeg multimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT bamarnijiman multimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT vantuldermauritsw multimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation
AT anemajohannesr multimediacampaigntoimprovebackbeliefsinpatientswithnonspecificlowbackpainaprocessevaluation