Cargando…
Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
Some studies have shown that low frequency stimulation (LFS, most commonly 60 Hz), compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS, most commonly 130 Hz), has beneficial effects, short-term or even long-term, on improving freezing of gait (FOG) and other axial symptoms, including speech and swallowing f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0083-7 |
_version_ | 1783237595352793088 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Tao Padmanaban, Mahesh Bloom, Lisa MacCracken, Ellen Bertacchi, Breanna Dachman, Abraham Warnke, Peter |
author_facet | Xie, Tao Padmanaban, Mahesh Bloom, Lisa MacCracken, Ellen Bertacchi, Breanna Dachman, Abraham Warnke, Peter |
author_sort | Xie, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some studies have shown that low frequency stimulation (LFS, most commonly 60 Hz), compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS, most commonly 130 Hz), has beneficial effects, short-term or even long-term, on improving freezing of gait (FOG) and other axial symptoms, including speech and swallowing function, in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). However, other studies failed to confirm this. It seems not clear what determines the difference in response to LFS. Differences in study design, such as presence or absence of FOG, exact LFS used (60 Hz versus 80 Hz), study size, open label versus randomized double blind assessment, retrospective versus prospective evaluation, medication On or Off state, total electric energy delivered maintained or not with the change in frequency, and the location of active contacts could all potentially affect the results. This mini-review goes over the literature with the aforementioned factors in mind, focusing on the effect of LFS versus HFS on FOG and other axial symptoms in PD with bilateral STN DBS, in an effort to extract the essential data to guide our clinical management of axial symptoms and explore the potential underlying mechanisms as well. Overall, LFS of 60 Hz seems to be consistently effective in patients with FOG at the usual HFS in regards to improving FOG, speech, swallowing function and other axial symptoms, though LFS could reduce tremor control in some patients. Whether LFS simply addresses the axial symptoms in the context of HFS or has other beneficial effects requires further studies, along with the mechanism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5437495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54374952017-05-19 Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review Xie, Tao Padmanaban, Mahesh Bloom, Lisa MacCracken, Ellen Bertacchi, Breanna Dachman, Abraham Warnke, Peter Transl Neurodegener Review Some studies have shown that low frequency stimulation (LFS, most commonly 60 Hz), compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS, most commonly 130 Hz), has beneficial effects, short-term or even long-term, on improving freezing of gait (FOG) and other axial symptoms, including speech and swallowing function, in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). However, other studies failed to confirm this. It seems not clear what determines the difference in response to LFS. Differences in study design, such as presence or absence of FOG, exact LFS used (60 Hz versus 80 Hz), study size, open label versus randomized double blind assessment, retrospective versus prospective evaluation, medication On or Off state, total electric energy delivered maintained or not with the change in frequency, and the location of active contacts could all potentially affect the results. This mini-review goes over the literature with the aforementioned factors in mind, focusing on the effect of LFS versus HFS on FOG and other axial symptoms in PD with bilateral STN DBS, in an effort to extract the essential data to guide our clinical management of axial symptoms and explore the potential underlying mechanisms as well. Overall, LFS of 60 Hz seems to be consistently effective in patients with FOG at the usual HFS in regards to improving FOG, speech, swallowing function and other axial symptoms, though LFS could reduce tremor control in some patients. Whether LFS simply addresses the axial symptoms in the context of HFS or has other beneficial effects requires further studies, along with the mechanism. BioMed Central 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5437495/ /pubmed/28529730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0083-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Xie, Tao Padmanaban, Mahesh Bloom, Lisa MacCracken, Ellen Bertacchi, Breanna Dachman, Abraham Warnke, Peter Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review |
title | Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review |
title_full | Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review |
title_fullStr | Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review |
title_short | Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review |
title_sort | effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in parkinson patients with bilateral stn dbs: a mini-review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0083-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xietao effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview AT padmanabanmahesh effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview AT bloomlisa effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview AT maccrackenellen effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview AT bertacchibreanna effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview AT dachmanabraham effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview AT warnkepeter effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview |