Cargando…

Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review

Some studies have shown that low frequency stimulation (LFS, most commonly 60 Hz), compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS, most commonly 130 Hz), has beneficial effects, short-term or even long-term, on improving freezing of gait (FOG) and other axial symptoms, including speech and swallowing f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Tao, Padmanaban, Mahesh, Bloom, Lisa, MacCracken, Ellen, Bertacchi, Breanna, Dachman, Abraham, Warnke, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0083-7
_version_ 1783237595352793088
author Xie, Tao
Padmanaban, Mahesh
Bloom, Lisa
MacCracken, Ellen
Bertacchi, Breanna
Dachman, Abraham
Warnke, Peter
author_facet Xie, Tao
Padmanaban, Mahesh
Bloom, Lisa
MacCracken, Ellen
Bertacchi, Breanna
Dachman, Abraham
Warnke, Peter
author_sort Xie, Tao
collection PubMed
description Some studies have shown that low frequency stimulation (LFS, most commonly 60 Hz), compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS, most commonly 130 Hz), has beneficial effects, short-term or even long-term, on improving freezing of gait (FOG) and other axial symptoms, including speech and swallowing function, in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). However, other studies failed to confirm this. It seems not clear what determines the difference in response to LFS. Differences in study design, such as presence or absence of FOG, exact LFS used (60 Hz versus 80 Hz), study size, open label versus randomized double blind assessment, retrospective versus prospective evaluation, medication On or Off state, total electric energy delivered maintained or not with the change in frequency, and the location of active contacts could all potentially affect the results. This mini-review goes over the literature with the aforementioned factors in mind, focusing on the effect of LFS versus HFS on FOG and other axial symptoms in PD with bilateral STN DBS, in an effort to extract the essential data to guide our clinical management of axial symptoms and explore the potential underlying mechanisms as well. Overall, LFS of 60 Hz seems to be consistently effective in patients with FOG at the usual HFS in regards to improving FOG, speech, swallowing function and other axial symptoms, though LFS could reduce tremor control in some patients. Whether LFS simply addresses the axial symptoms in the context of HFS or has other beneficial effects requires further studies, along with the mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5437495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54374952017-05-19 Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review Xie, Tao Padmanaban, Mahesh Bloom, Lisa MacCracken, Ellen Bertacchi, Breanna Dachman, Abraham Warnke, Peter Transl Neurodegener Review Some studies have shown that low frequency stimulation (LFS, most commonly 60 Hz), compared to high frequency stimulation (HFS, most commonly 130 Hz), has beneficial effects, short-term or even long-term, on improving freezing of gait (FOG) and other axial symptoms, including speech and swallowing function, in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). However, other studies failed to confirm this. It seems not clear what determines the difference in response to LFS. Differences in study design, such as presence or absence of FOG, exact LFS used (60 Hz versus 80 Hz), study size, open label versus randomized double blind assessment, retrospective versus prospective evaluation, medication On or Off state, total electric energy delivered maintained or not with the change in frequency, and the location of active contacts could all potentially affect the results. This mini-review goes over the literature with the aforementioned factors in mind, focusing on the effect of LFS versus HFS on FOG and other axial symptoms in PD with bilateral STN DBS, in an effort to extract the essential data to guide our clinical management of axial symptoms and explore the potential underlying mechanisms as well. Overall, LFS of 60 Hz seems to be consistently effective in patients with FOG at the usual HFS in regards to improving FOG, speech, swallowing function and other axial symptoms, though LFS could reduce tremor control in some patients. Whether LFS simply addresses the axial symptoms in the context of HFS or has other beneficial effects requires further studies, along with the mechanism. BioMed Central 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5437495/ /pubmed/28529730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0083-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Xie, Tao
Padmanaban, Mahesh
Bloom, Lisa
MacCracken, Ellen
Bertacchi, Breanna
Dachman, Abraham
Warnke, Peter
Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
title Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
title_full Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
title_fullStr Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
title_full_unstemmed Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
title_short Effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in Parkinson patients with bilateral STN DBS: a mini-review
title_sort effect of low versus high frequency stimulation on freezing of gait and other axial symptoms in parkinson patients with bilateral stn dbs: a mini-review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0083-7
work_keys_str_mv AT xietao effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview
AT padmanabanmahesh effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview
AT bloomlisa effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview
AT maccrackenellen effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview
AT bertacchibreanna effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview
AT dachmanabraham effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview
AT warnkepeter effectoflowversushighfrequencystimulationonfreezingofgaitandotheraxialsymptomsinparkinsonpatientswithbilateralstndbsaminireview