Cargando…
Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies
Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) is one of the most serious threats for the swine industry worldwide. It is commonly associated with the proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the pig intestine. Colistin, a cationic antibiotic, is widely used in swine for the oral treatment of intestinal in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28526080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0299-7 |
_version_ | 1783237642160177152 |
---|---|
author | Rhouma, Mohamed Fairbrother, John Morris Beaudry, Francis Letellier, Ann |
author_facet | Rhouma, Mohamed Fairbrother, John Morris Beaudry, Francis Letellier, Ann |
author_sort | Rhouma, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) is one of the most serious threats for the swine industry worldwide. It is commonly associated with the proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the pig intestine. Colistin, a cationic antibiotic, is widely used in swine for the oral treatment of intestinal infections caused by E. coli, and particularly of PWD. However, despite the effectiveness of this antibiotic in the treatment of PWD, several studies have reported high rates of colistin resistant E. coli in swine. Furthermore, this antibiotic is considered of very high importance in humans, being used for the treatment of infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Moreover, the recent discovery of the mcr-1 gene encoding for colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae on a conjugative stable plasmid has raised great concern about the possible loss of colistin effectiveness for the treatment of MDR-GNB in humans. Consequently, it has been proposed that the use of colistin in animal production should be considered as a last resort treatment only. Thus, to overcome the economic losses, which would result from the restriction of use of colistin, especially for prophylactic purposes in PWD control, we believe that an understanding of the factors contributing to the development of this disease and the putting in place of practical alternative strategies for the control of PWD in swine is crucial. Such alternatives should improve animal gut health and reduce economic losses in pigs without promoting bacterial resistance. The present review begins with an overview of risk factors of PWD and an update of colistin use in PWD control worldwide in terms of quantities and microbiological outcomes. Subsequently, alternative strategies to the use of colistin for the control of this disease are described and discussed. Finally, a practical approach for the control of PWD in its various phases is proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5437690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54376902017-05-22 Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies Rhouma, Mohamed Fairbrother, John Morris Beaudry, Francis Letellier, Ann Acta Vet Scand Review Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) is one of the most serious threats for the swine industry worldwide. It is commonly associated with the proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the pig intestine. Colistin, a cationic antibiotic, is widely used in swine for the oral treatment of intestinal infections caused by E. coli, and particularly of PWD. However, despite the effectiveness of this antibiotic in the treatment of PWD, several studies have reported high rates of colistin resistant E. coli in swine. Furthermore, this antibiotic is considered of very high importance in humans, being used for the treatment of infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Moreover, the recent discovery of the mcr-1 gene encoding for colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae on a conjugative stable plasmid has raised great concern about the possible loss of colistin effectiveness for the treatment of MDR-GNB in humans. Consequently, it has been proposed that the use of colistin in animal production should be considered as a last resort treatment only. Thus, to overcome the economic losses, which would result from the restriction of use of colistin, especially for prophylactic purposes in PWD control, we believe that an understanding of the factors contributing to the development of this disease and the putting in place of practical alternative strategies for the control of PWD in swine is crucial. Such alternatives should improve animal gut health and reduce economic losses in pigs without promoting bacterial resistance. The present review begins with an overview of risk factors of PWD and an update of colistin use in PWD control worldwide in terms of quantities and microbiological outcomes. Subsequently, alternative strategies to the use of colistin for the control of this disease are described and discussed. Finally, a practical approach for the control of PWD in its various phases is proposed. BioMed Central 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5437690/ /pubmed/28526080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0299-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Rhouma, Mohamed Fairbrother, John Morris Beaudry, Francis Letellier, Ann Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
title | Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
title_full | Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
title_fullStr | Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
title_short | Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
title_sort | post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28526080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0299-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhoumamohamed postweaningdiarrheainpigsriskfactorsandnoncolistinbasedcontrolstrategies AT fairbrotherjohnmorris postweaningdiarrheainpigsriskfactorsandnoncolistinbasedcontrolstrategies AT beaudryfrancis postweaningdiarrheainpigsriskfactorsandnoncolistinbasedcontrolstrategies AT letellierann postweaningdiarrheainpigsriskfactorsandnoncolistinbasedcontrolstrategies |