Cargando…

Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the pleth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krivoshei, Lian, Weber, Stefan, Burkard, Thilo, Maseli, Anna, Brasier, Noe, Kühne, Michael, Conen, David, Huebner, Thomas, Seeck, Andrea, Eckstein, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125
_version_ 1783237644943097856
author Krivoshei, Lian
Weber, Stefan
Burkard, Thilo
Maseli, Anna
Brasier, Noe
Kühne, Michael
Conen, David
Huebner, Thomas
Seeck, Andrea
Eckstein, Jens
author_facet Krivoshei, Lian
Weber, Stefan
Burkard, Thilo
Maseli, Anna
Brasier, Noe
Kühne, Michael
Conen, David
Huebner, Thomas
Seeck, Andrea
Eckstein, Jens
author_sort Krivoshei, Lian
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the plethysmographic sensor of an iPhone 4S and the integrated LED only. METHODS AND RESULTS: For signal acquisition, we used an iPhone 4S, positioned with the camera lens and LED light on the index fingertip. A 5 min video file was recorded with the pulse wave extracted from the green light spectrum of the signal. RR intervals were automatically identified. For discrimination between AF and SR, we tested three different statistical methods. Normalized root mean square of successive difference of RR intervals (nRMSSD), Shannon entropy (ShE), and SD1/SD2 index extracted from a Poincaré plot. Eighty patients were included in the study (40 patients in AF and 40 patients in SR at the time of examination). For discrimination between AF and SR, ShE yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity with 85 and 95%, respectively. Applying a tachogram filter resulted in an improved sensitivity of 87.5%, when combining ShE and nRMSSD, while specificity remained stable at 95%. A combination of SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD led to further improvement and resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The algorithm tested reliably discriminated between SR and AF based on pulse wave signals from a smartphone camera only. Implementation of this algorithm into a smartwatch is the next logical step.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5437701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54377012017-05-24 Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) Krivoshei, Lian Weber, Stefan Burkard, Thilo Maseli, Anna Brasier, Noe Kühne, Michael Conen, David Huebner, Thomas Seeck, Andrea Eckstein, Jens Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the plethysmographic sensor of an iPhone 4S and the integrated LED only. METHODS AND RESULTS: For signal acquisition, we used an iPhone 4S, positioned with the camera lens and LED light on the index fingertip. A 5 min video file was recorded with the pulse wave extracted from the green light spectrum of the signal. RR intervals were automatically identified. For discrimination between AF and SR, we tested three different statistical methods. Normalized root mean square of successive difference of RR intervals (nRMSSD), Shannon entropy (ShE), and SD1/SD2 index extracted from a Poincaré plot. Eighty patients were included in the study (40 patients in AF and 40 patients in SR at the time of examination). For discrimination between AF and SR, ShE yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity with 85 and 95%, respectively. Applying a tachogram filter resulted in an improved sensitivity of 87.5%, when combining ShE and nRMSSD, while specificity remained stable at 95%. A combination of SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD led to further improvement and resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The algorithm tested reliably discriminated between SR and AF based on pulse wave signals from a smartphone camera only. Implementation of this algorithm into a smartwatch is the next logical step. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2016-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5437701/ /pubmed/27371660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Krivoshei, Lian
Weber, Stefan
Burkard, Thilo
Maseli, Anna
Brasier, Noe
Kühne, Michael
Conen, David
Huebner, Thomas
Seeck, Andrea
Eckstein, Jens
Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
title Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
title_full Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
title_fullStr Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
title_full_unstemmed Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
title_short Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
title_sort smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125
work_keys_str_mv AT krivosheilian smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT weberstefan smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT burkardthilo smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT maselianna smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT brasiernoe smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT kuhnemichael smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT conendavid smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT huebnerthomas smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT seeckandrea smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation
AT ecksteinjens smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation