Cargando…
Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†)
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the pleth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125 |
_version_ | 1783237644943097856 |
---|---|
author | Krivoshei, Lian Weber, Stefan Burkard, Thilo Maseli, Anna Brasier, Noe Kühne, Michael Conen, David Huebner, Thomas Seeck, Andrea Eckstein, Jens |
author_facet | Krivoshei, Lian Weber, Stefan Burkard, Thilo Maseli, Anna Brasier, Noe Kühne, Michael Conen, David Huebner, Thomas Seeck, Andrea Eckstein, Jens |
author_sort | Krivoshei, Lian |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the plethysmographic sensor of an iPhone 4S and the integrated LED only. METHODS AND RESULTS: For signal acquisition, we used an iPhone 4S, positioned with the camera lens and LED light on the index fingertip. A 5 min video file was recorded with the pulse wave extracted from the green light spectrum of the signal. RR intervals were automatically identified. For discrimination between AF and SR, we tested three different statistical methods. Normalized root mean square of successive difference of RR intervals (nRMSSD), Shannon entropy (ShE), and SD1/SD2 index extracted from a Poincaré plot. Eighty patients were included in the study (40 patients in AF and 40 patients in SR at the time of examination). For discrimination between AF and SR, ShE yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity with 85 and 95%, respectively. Applying a tachogram filter resulted in an improved sensitivity of 87.5%, when combining ShE and nRMSSD, while specificity remained stable at 95%. A combination of SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD led to further improvement and resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The algorithm tested reliably discriminated between SR and AF based on pulse wave signals from a smartphone camera only. Implementation of this algorithm into a smartwatch is the next logical step. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5437701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54377012017-05-24 Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) Krivoshei, Lian Weber, Stefan Burkard, Thilo Maseli, Anna Brasier, Noe Kühne, Michael Conen, David Huebner, Thomas Seeck, Andrea Eckstein, Jens Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the plethysmographic sensor of an iPhone 4S and the integrated LED only. METHODS AND RESULTS: For signal acquisition, we used an iPhone 4S, positioned with the camera lens and LED light on the index fingertip. A 5 min video file was recorded with the pulse wave extracted from the green light spectrum of the signal. RR intervals were automatically identified. For discrimination between AF and SR, we tested three different statistical methods. Normalized root mean square of successive difference of RR intervals (nRMSSD), Shannon entropy (ShE), and SD1/SD2 index extracted from a Poincaré plot. Eighty patients were included in the study (40 patients in AF and 40 patients in SR at the time of examination). For discrimination between AF and SR, ShE yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity with 85 and 95%, respectively. Applying a tachogram filter resulted in an improved sensitivity of 87.5%, when combining ShE and nRMSSD, while specificity remained stable at 95%. A combination of SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD led to further improvement and resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The algorithm tested reliably discriminated between SR and AF based on pulse wave signals from a smartphone camera only. Implementation of this algorithm into a smartwatch is the next logical step. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2016-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5437701/ /pubmed/27371660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Krivoshei, Lian Weber, Stefan Burkard, Thilo Maseli, Anna Brasier, Noe Kühne, Michael Conen, David Huebner, Thomas Seeck, Andrea Eckstein, Jens Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
title | Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
title_full | Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
title_fullStr | Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
title_full_unstemmed | Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
title_short | Smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
title_sort | smart detection of atrial fibrillation(†) |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krivosheilian smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT weberstefan smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT burkardthilo smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT maselianna smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT brasiernoe smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT kuhnemichael smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT conendavid smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT huebnerthomas smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT seeckandrea smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation AT ecksteinjens smartdetectionofatrialfibrillation |