Cargando…
Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods
Cell-cell communication, also termed quorum sensing (QS), is a widespread process that coordinates gene expression in bacterial populations. The generally accepted view is that QS optimizes the cell density-dependent benefit attained from cooperative behaviors, often in the form of secreted products...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00885 |
_version_ | 1783237645961265152 |
---|---|
author | Schuster, Martin Sexton, D. Joseph Hense, Burkhard A. |
author_facet | Schuster, Martin Sexton, D. Joseph Hense, Burkhard A. |
author_sort | Schuster, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cell-cell communication, also termed quorum sensing (QS), is a widespread process that coordinates gene expression in bacterial populations. The generally accepted view is that QS optimizes the cell density-dependent benefit attained from cooperative behaviors, often in the form of secreted products referred to as “public goods.” This view is challenged by an increasing number of cell-associated products or “private goods” reported to be under QS-control for which a collective benefit is not apparent. A prominent example is nucleoside hydrolase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a periplasmic enzyme that catabolizes adenosine. Several recent studies have shown that private goods can function to stabilize cooperation by co-regulated public goods, seemingly explaining their control by QS. Here we argue that this property is a by-product of selection for other benefits rather than an adaptation. Emphasizing ecophysiological context, we propose alternative explanations for the QS control of private goods. We suggest that the benefit attained from private goods is associated with high cell density, either because a relevant ecological condition correlates with density, or because the private good is, directly or indirectly, involved in cooperative behavior. Our analysis helps guide a systems approach to QS, with implications for antivirulence drug design and synthetic biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5437708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54377082017-06-02 Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods Schuster, Martin Sexton, D. Joseph Hense, Burkhard A. Front Microbiol Microbiology Cell-cell communication, also termed quorum sensing (QS), is a widespread process that coordinates gene expression in bacterial populations. The generally accepted view is that QS optimizes the cell density-dependent benefit attained from cooperative behaviors, often in the form of secreted products referred to as “public goods.” This view is challenged by an increasing number of cell-associated products or “private goods” reported to be under QS-control for which a collective benefit is not apparent. A prominent example is nucleoside hydrolase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a periplasmic enzyme that catabolizes adenosine. Several recent studies have shown that private goods can function to stabilize cooperation by co-regulated public goods, seemingly explaining their control by QS. Here we argue that this property is a by-product of selection for other benefits rather than an adaptation. Emphasizing ecophysiological context, we propose alternative explanations for the QS control of private goods. We suggest that the benefit attained from private goods is associated with high cell density, either because a relevant ecological condition correlates with density, or because the private good is, directly or indirectly, involved in cooperative behavior. Our analysis helps guide a systems approach to QS, with implications for antivirulence drug design and synthetic biology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5437708/ /pubmed/28579979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00885 Text en Copyright © 2017 Schuster, Sexton and Hense. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Schuster, Martin Sexton, D. Joseph Hense, Burkhard A. Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods |
title | Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods |
title_full | Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods |
title_fullStr | Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods |
title_short | Why Quorum Sensing Controls Private Goods |
title_sort | why quorum sensing controls private goods |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schustermartin whyquorumsensingcontrolsprivategoods AT sextondjoseph whyquorumsensingcontrolsprivategoods AT henseburkharda whyquorumsensingcontrolsprivategoods |