Cargando…
Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177965 |
_version_ | 1783237714094587904 |
---|---|
author | Kontson, Kimberly Marcus, Ian Myklebust, Barbara Civillico, Eugene |
author_facet | Kontson, Kimberly Marcus, Ian Myklebust, Barbara Civillico, Eugene |
author_sort | Kontson, Kimberly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure called the targeted BBT that allows for the study of initiation, grasping, and transport of objects, and also of object release. These modifications to the existing test may increase the ecological validity of the measure while still retaining the previously stated benefits of the standard BBT. METHODS: 19 able-bodied subjects performed the targeted BBT and two other standard tests. Using an integrated movement analysis framework based on motion capture and ground force data, quantitative information about how subjects completed these tests were captured. Kinematic parameters at the wrist, elbow, shoulder, thorax, and head, as well as measures of postural control, were calculated and statistically compared across the three tests. RESULTS: In general, the targeted BBT required significantly higher RoM at the elbow, shoulder, thorax and head when compared to standard tests. Peak angles at these joints were also higher during performance of the targeted BBT. Peak angles and RoM values for the targeted BBT were close to those found in studies of movements of able-bodied individuals performing activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The targeted BBT allows analysis of repetitive movements, and may more closely model common real-world object manipulation scenarios in which a user is required to control a movement from pick-up to release. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5438168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54381682017-05-27 Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests Kontson, Kimberly Marcus, Ian Myklebust, Barbara Civillico, Eugene PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure called the targeted BBT that allows for the study of initiation, grasping, and transport of objects, and also of object release. These modifications to the existing test may increase the ecological validity of the measure while still retaining the previously stated benefits of the standard BBT. METHODS: 19 able-bodied subjects performed the targeted BBT and two other standard tests. Using an integrated movement analysis framework based on motion capture and ground force data, quantitative information about how subjects completed these tests were captured. Kinematic parameters at the wrist, elbow, shoulder, thorax, and head, as well as measures of postural control, were calculated and statistically compared across the three tests. RESULTS: In general, the targeted BBT required significantly higher RoM at the elbow, shoulder, thorax and head when compared to standard tests. Peak angles at these joints were also higher during performance of the targeted BBT. Peak angles and RoM values for the targeted BBT were close to those found in studies of movements of able-bodied individuals performing activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The targeted BBT allows analysis of repetitive movements, and may more closely model common real-world object manipulation scenarios in which a user is required to control a movement from pick-up to release. Public Library of Science 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5438168/ /pubmed/28542374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177965 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kontson, Kimberly Marcus, Ian Myklebust, Barbara Civillico, Eugene Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests |
title | Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests |
title_full | Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests |
title_fullStr | Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests |
title_short | Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests |
title_sort | targeted box and blocks test: normative data and comparison to standard tests |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kontsonkimberly targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests AT marcusian targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests AT myklebustbarbara targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests AT civillicoeugene targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests |