Cargando…

Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests

BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontson, Kimberly, Marcus, Ian, Myklebust, Barbara, Civillico, Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177965
_version_ 1783237714094587904
author Kontson, Kimberly
Marcus, Ian
Myklebust, Barbara
Civillico, Eugene
author_facet Kontson, Kimberly
Marcus, Ian
Myklebust, Barbara
Civillico, Eugene
author_sort Kontson, Kimberly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure called the targeted BBT that allows for the study of initiation, grasping, and transport of objects, and also of object release. These modifications to the existing test may increase the ecological validity of the measure while still retaining the previously stated benefits of the standard BBT. METHODS: 19 able-bodied subjects performed the targeted BBT and two other standard tests. Using an integrated movement analysis framework based on motion capture and ground force data, quantitative information about how subjects completed these tests were captured. Kinematic parameters at the wrist, elbow, shoulder, thorax, and head, as well as measures of postural control, were calculated and statistically compared across the three tests. RESULTS: In general, the targeted BBT required significantly higher RoM at the elbow, shoulder, thorax and head when compared to standard tests. Peak angles at these joints were also higher during performance of the targeted BBT. Peak angles and RoM values for the targeted BBT were close to those found in studies of movements of able-bodied individuals performing activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The targeted BBT allows analysis of repetitive movements, and may more closely model common real-world object manipulation scenarios in which a user is required to control a movement from pick-up to release.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5438168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54381682017-05-27 Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests Kontson, Kimberly Marcus, Ian Myklebust, Barbara Civillico, Eugene PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a functional outcome measure that is commonly used across multiple clinical populations due to its benefits of ease and speed of implementation; reliable, objective measurement; and repetition of motion. In this study, we introduce a novel outcome measure called the targeted BBT that allows for the study of initiation, grasping, and transport of objects, and also of object release. These modifications to the existing test may increase the ecological validity of the measure while still retaining the previously stated benefits of the standard BBT. METHODS: 19 able-bodied subjects performed the targeted BBT and two other standard tests. Using an integrated movement analysis framework based on motion capture and ground force data, quantitative information about how subjects completed these tests were captured. Kinematic parameters at the wrist, elbow, shoulder, thorax, and head, as well as measures of postural control, were calculated and statistically compared across the three tests. RESULTS: In general, the targeted BBT required significantly higher RoM at the elbow, shoulder, thorax and head when compared to standard tests. Peak angles at these joints were also higher during performance of the targeted BBT. Peak angles and RoM values for the targeted BBT were close to those found in studies of movements of able-bodied individuals performing activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The targeted BBT allows analysis of repetitive movements, and may more closely model common real-world object manipulation scenarios in which a user is required to control a movement from pick-up to release. Public Library of Science 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5438168/ /pubmed/28542374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177965 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kontson, Kimberly
Marcus, Ian
Myklebust, Barbara
Civillico, Eugene
Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
title Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
title_full Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
title_fullStr Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
title_full_unstemmed Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
title_short Targeted box and blocks test: Normative data and comparison to standard tests
title_sort targeted box and blocks test: normative data and comparison to standard tests
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177965
work_keys_str_mv AT kontsonkimberly targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests
AT marcusian targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests
AT myklebustbarbara targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests
AT civillicoeugene targetedboxandblockstestnormativedataandcomparisontostandardtests