Cargando…

A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations

BACKGROUND: This paper describes a combined heuristic and hidden Markov model (HMM) method to accurately impute missing genotypes in livestock datasets. Genomic selection in breeding programs requires high-density genotyping of many individuals, making algorithms that economically generate this info...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antolín, Roberto, Nettelblad, Carl, Gorjanc, Gregor, Money, Daniel, Hickey, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0300-y
_version_ 1783237891703439360
author Antolín, Roberto
Nettelblad, Carl
Gorjanc, Gregor
Money, Daniel
Hickey, John M.
author_facet Antolín, Roberto
Nettelblad, Carl
Gorjanc, Gregor
Money, Daniel
Hickey, John M.
author_sort Antolín, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper describes a combined heuristic and hidden Markov model (HMM) method to accurately impute missing genotypes in livestock datasets. Genomic selection in breeding programs requires high-density genotyping of many individuals, making algorithms that economically generate this information crucial. There are two common classes of imputation methods, heuristic methods and probabilistic methods, the latter being largely based on hidden Markov models. Heuristic methods are robust, but fail to impute markers in regions where the thresholds of heuristic rules are not met, or the pedigree is inconsistent. Hidden Markov models are probabilistic methods which typically do not require specific family structures or pedigree information, making them very flexible, but they are computationally expensive and, in some cases, less accurate. RESULTS: We implemented a new hybrid imputation method that combined heuristic and HMM methods, AlphaImpute and MaCH, and compared the computation time and imputation accuracy of the three methods. AlphaImpute was the fastest, followed by the hybrid method and then the HMM. The computation time of the hybrid method and the HMM increased linearly with the number of iterations used in the hidden Markov model, however, the computation time of the hybrid method increased almost linearly and that of the HMM quadratically with the number of template haplotypes. The hybrid method was the most accurate imputation method for low-density panels when pedigree information was missing, especially if minor allele frequency was also low. The accuracy of the hybrid method and the HMM increased with the number of template haplotypes. The imputation accuracy of all three methods increased with the marker density of the low-density panels. Excluding the pedigree information reduced imputation accuracy for the hybrid method and AlphaImpute. Finally, the imputation accuracy of the three methods decreased with decreasing minor allele frequency. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid heuristic and probabilistic imputation method is able to impute all markers for all individuals in a population, as the HMM. The hybrid method is usually more accurate and never significantly less accurate than a purely heuristic method or a purely probabilistic method and is faster than a standard probabilistic method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0300-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5439152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54391522017-05-23 A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations Antolín, Roberto Nettelblad, Carl Gorjanc, Gregor Money, Daniel Hickey, John M. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper describes a combined heuristic and hidden Markov model (HMM) method to accurately impute missing genotypes in livestock datasets. Genomic selection in breeding programs requires high-density genotyping of many individuals, making algorithms that economically generate this information crucial. There are two common classes of imputation methods, heuristic methods and probabilistic methods, the latter being largely based on hidden Markov models. Heuristic methods are robust, but fail to impute markers in regions where the thresholds of heuristic rules are not met, or the pedigree is inconsistent. Hidden Markov models are probabilistic methods which typically do not require specific family structures or pedigree information, making them very flexible, but they are computationally expensive and, in some cases, less accurate. RESULTS: We implemented a new hybrid imputation method that combined heuristic and HMM methods, AlphaImpute and MaCH, and compared the computation time and imputation accuracy of the three methods. AlphaImpute was the fastest, followed by the hybrid method and then the HMM. The computation time of the hybrid method and the HMM increased linearly with the number of iterations used in the hidden Markov model, however, the computation time of the hybrid method increased almost linearly and that of the HMM quadratically with the number of template haplotypes. The hybrid method was the most accurate imputation method for low-density panels when pedigree information was missing, especially if minor allele frequency was also low. The accuracy of the hybrid method and the HMM increased with the number of template haplotypes. The imputation accuracy of all three methods increased with the marker density of the low-density panels. Excluding the pedigree information reduced imputation accuracy for the hybrid method and AlphaImpute. Finally, the imputation accuracy of the three methods decreased with decreasing minor allele frequency. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid heuristic and probabilistic imputation method is able to impute all markers for all individuals in a population, as the HMM. The hybrid method is usually more accurate and never significantly less accurate than a purely heuristic method or a purely probabilistic method and is faster than a standard probabilistic method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0300-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5439152/ /pubmed/28253858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0300-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Antolín, Roberto
Nettelblad, Carl
Gorjanc, Gregor
Money, Daniel
Hickey, John M.
A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
title A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
title_full A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
title_fullStr A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
title_full_unstemmed A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
title_short A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
title_sort hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28253858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0300-y
work_keys_str_mv AT antolinroberto ahybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT nettelbladcarl ahybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT gorjancgregor ahybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT moneydaniel ahybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT hickeyjohnm ahybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT antolinroberto hybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT nettelbladcarl hybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT gorjancgregor hybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT moneydaniel hybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations
AT hickeyjohnm hybridmethodfortheimputationofgenomicdatainlivestockpopulations