Cargando…

Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator

BACKGROUND: The treatment of open fractures leads to major problems which may be due to various reasons. It mainly causes soft tissue problems due to the absorption of a large amount of energy by the soft tissues and bone tissues. Although some recent treatment protocols have eliminated many problem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yıldırım, Azad, Kapukaya, Ahmet, Mertsoy, Yılmaz, Yiğit, Şehmus, Çaçan, Mehmet Akif, Atiç, Ramazan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205686
_version_ 1783237924274307072
author Yıldırım, Azad
Kapukaya, Ahmet
Mertsoy, Yılmaz
Yiğit, Şehmus
Çaçan, Mehmet Akif
Atiç, Ramazan
author_facet Yıldırım, Azad
Kapukaya, Ahmet
Mertsoy, Yılmaz
Yiğit, Şehmus
Çaçan, Mehmet Akif
Atiç, Ramazan
author_sort Yıldırım, Azad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of open fractures leads to major problems which may be due to various reasons. It mainly causes soft tissue problems due to the absorption of a large amount of energy by the soft tissues and bone tissues. Although some recent treatment protocols have eliminated many problems regarding delayed soft tissue closure, it still remains a big challange. This study uses a method called the internal fixator technique with noncontact locking plate (NC-LP) which involves the use of a combination of advantages of open and closed fixation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 42 patients (32 men and 10 women) having a mean age of 34.11 years (range 17–56 years) with open fractures operated using internal fixator technique between 2007 and 2012 were included in this study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to record the following: age, gender, anatomic region of fractures, fracture etiology, classification of open fractures by Gustilo–Anderson and AO classification, surgeries, length of hospitalization, location and pattern of fracture, length of followup, and complications. RESULTS: The fractures were caused by traffic accidents, shotgun injuries, falls from heights, and industrial crush injuries. Based on the Gustilo–Anderson classification, 31 fractures were Type III and 11 were Type II, where 23 were localized in the tibia and 19 in the femur. Patients delay for a mean of 13.5 h (range 6–24 h) for operation and the mean followup interval was 27.8 months (range 16–44 months). The mean union time was 19.7 weeks (range 16–29 weeks). One patient had delayed union and implant failure, one patient had osteomyelitis, five suffered from surface skin necrosis, and one patient had an angulation of 17° in the sagittal plane, for which no additional intervention was performed. CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates that an “internal fixator technique” is an acceptable alternative to the management of open fractures of the femur or tibia in adult patients. The NC-LP method provided opportunities to achieve a stable fixation with noncontact between the implant and the bone tissues, and the fractures were sufficiently stabilized to allow union with a low complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5439318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54393182017-05-31 Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator Yıldırım, Azad Kapukaya, Ahmet Mertsoy, Yılmaz Yiğit, Şehmus Çaçan, Mehmet Akif Atiç, Ramazan Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: The treatment of open fractures leads to major problems which may be due to various reasons. It mainly causes soft tissue problems due to the absorption of a large amount of energy by the soft tissues and bone tissues. Although some recent treatment protocols have eliminated many problems regarding delayed soft tissue closure, it still remains a big challange. This study uses a method called the internal fixator technique with noncontact locking plate (NC-LP) which involves the use of a combination of advantages of open and closed fixation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 42 patients (32 men and 10 women) having a mean age of 34.11 years (range 17–56 years) with open fractures operated using internal fixator technique between 2007 and 2012 were included in this study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to record the following: age, gender, anatomic region of fractures, fracture etiology, classification of open fractures by Gustilo–Anderson and AO classification, surgeries, length of hospitalization, location and pattern of fracture, length of followup, and complications. RESULTS: The fractures were caused by traffic accidents, shotgun injuries, falls from heights, and industrial crush injuries. Based on the Gustilo–Anderson classification, 31 fractures were Type III and 11 were Type II, where 23 were localized in the tibia and 19 in the femur. Patients delay for a mean of 13.5 h (range 6–24 h) for operation and the mean followup interval was 27.8 months (range 16–44 months). The mean union time was 19.7 weeks (range 16–29 weeks). One patient had delayed union and implant failure, one patient had osteomyelitis, five suffered from surface skin necrosis, and one patient had an angulation of 17° in the sagittal plane, for which no additional intervention was performed. CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates that an “internal fixator technique” is an acceptable alternative to the management of open fractures of the femur or tibia in adult patients. The NC-LP method provided opportunities to achieve a stable fixation with noncontact between the implant and the bone tissues, and the fractures were sufficiently stabilized to allow union with a low complication rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5439318/ /pubmed/28566784 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205686 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yıldırım, Azad
Kapukaya, Ahmet
Mertsoy, Yılmaz
Yiğit, Şehmus
Çaçan, Mehmet Akif
Atiç, Ramazan
Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
title Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
title_full Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
title_fullStr Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
title_full_unstemmed Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
title_short Management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
title_sort management of open fractures using a noncontact locking plate as an internal fixator
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205686
work_keys_str_mv AT yıldırımazad managementofopenfracturesusinganoncontactlockingplateasaninternalfixator
AT kapukayaahmet managementofopenfracturesusinganoncontactlockingplateasaninternalfixator
AT mertsoyyılmaz managementofopenfracturesusinganoncontactlockingplateasaninternalfixator
AT yigitsehmus managementofopenfracturesusinganoncontactlockingplateasaninternalfixator
AT cacanmehmetakif managementofopenfracturesusinganoncontactlockingplateasaninternalfixator
AT aticramazan managementofopenfracturesusinganoncontactlockingplateasaninternalfixator