Cargando…

Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?

We calibrated and evaluated the agricultural model AquaCrop for the simulation of water use and yield of a short‐rotation coppice (SRC) plantation with poplar (Populus) in East Flanders (Belgium) during the second and the third rotation (first 2 years only). Differences in crop development and growt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horemans, Joanna A., Van Gaelen, Hanne, Raes, Dirk, Zenone, Terenzio, Ceulemans, Reinhart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12422
_version_ 1783237954320203776
author Horemans, Joanna A.
Van Gaelen, Hanne
Raes, Dirk
Zenone, Terenzio
Ceulemans, Reinhart
author_facet Horemans, Joanna A.
Van Gaelen, Hanne
Raes, Dirk
Zenone, Terenzio
Ceulemans, Reinhart
author_sort Horemans, Joanna A.
collection PubMed
description We calibrated and evaluated the agricultural model AquaCrop for the simulation of water use and yield of a short‐rotation coppice (SRC) plantation with poplar (Populus) in East Flanders (Belgium) during the second and the third rotation (first 2 years only). Differences in crop development and growth during the course of the rotations were taken into account during the model calibration. Overall, the AquaCrop model showed good performance for the daily simulation of soil water content (R (2) of 0.57–0.85), of green canopy cover (R (2) > 0.87), of evapotranspiration (ET; R (2) > 0.76), and of potential yield. The simulated, total yearly water use of the SRC ranged between 55% and 85% of the water use of a reference grass ecosystem calculated under the same environmental conditions. Crop transpiration was between 67% and 93% of total ET, with lower percentages in the first than in the second year of each rotation. The observed (dry mass) yield ranged from 6.61 to 14.76 Mg ha(−1) yr(−1). A yield gap of around 30% was observed between the second and the third rotation, as well as between simulated and observed yield during the third rotation. This could possibly be explained by the expansion of the understory (weed) layer; the relative cover of understory weeds was 22% in the third year of the third rotation. The agricultural AquaCrop model simulated total water use and potential yield of the operational SRC in a reliable way. As the plantation was extensively managed, potential effects of irrigation and/or fertilization on ET and on yield were not considered in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5439494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54394942017-06-08 Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice? Horemans, Joanna A. Van Gaelen, Hanne Raes, Dirk Zenone, Terenzio Ceulemans, Reinhart Glob Change Biol Bioenergy Original Research We calibrated and evaluated the agricultural model AquaCrop for the simulation of water use and yield of a short‐rotation coppice (SRC) plantation with poplar (Populus) in East Flanders (Belgium) during the second and the third rotation (first 2 years only). Differences in crop development and growth during the course of the rotations were taken into account during the model calibration. Overall, the AquaCrop model showed good performance for the daily simulation of soil water content (R (2) of 0.57–0.85), of green canopy cover (R (2) > 0.87), of evapotranspiration (ET; R (2) > 0.76), and of potential yield. The simulated, total yearly water use of the SRC ranged between 55% and 85% of the water use of a reference grass ecosystem calculated under the same environmental conditions. Crop transpiration was between 67% and 93% of total ET, with lower percentages in the first than in the second year of each rotation. The observed (dry mass) yield ranged from 6.61 to 14.76 Mg ha(−1) yr(−1). A yield gap of around 30% was observed between the second and the third rotation, as well as between simulated and observed yield during the third rotation. This could possibly be explained by the expansion of the understory (weed) layer; the relative cover of understory weeds was 22% in the third year of the third rotation. The agricultural AquaCrop model simulated total water use and potential yield of the operational SRC in a reliable way. As the plantation was extensively managed, potential effects of irrigation and/or fertilization on ET and on yield were not considered in this study. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-16 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5439494/ /pubmed/28603557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12422 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Global Change Biology Bioenergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Horemans, Joanna A.
Van Gaelen, Hanne
Raes, Dirk
Zenone, Terenzio
Ceulemans, Reinhart
Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
title Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
title_full Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
title_fullStr Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
title_full_unstemmed Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
title_short Can the agricultural AquaCrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
title_sort can the agricultural aquacrop model simulate water use and yield of a poplar short‐rotation coppice?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12422
work_keys_str_mv AT horemansjoannaa cantheagriculturalaquacropmodelsimulatewateruseandyieldofapoplarshortrotationcoppice
AT vangaelenhanne cantheagriculturalaquacropmodelsimulatewateruseandyieldofapoplarshortrotationcoppice
AT raesdirk cantheagriculturalaquacropmodelsimulatewateruseandyieldofapoplarshortrotationcoppice
AT zenoneterenzio cantheagriculturalaquacropmodelsimulatewateruseandyieldofapoplarshortrotationcoppice
AT ceulemansreinhart cantheagriculturalaquacropmodelsimulatewateruseandyieldofapoplarshortrotationcoppice