Cargando…

Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes

PURPOSE: To explore guidelines on the use of MRI and PET/CT monitoring primary tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), taking breast cancer subtype into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 188 women were included with stages II and III breast cancer. MRI and (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, Alexander M. Th., Teixeira, Suzana C., Pengel, Kenneth E., Loo, Claudette E., Vogel, Wouter V., Wesseling, Jelle, Rutgers, Emiel J. Th., Valdés Olmos, Renato A., Sonke, Gabe S., Rodenhuis, Sjoerd, Vrancken Peeters, Marie Jeanne T. F. D., Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176782
_version_ 1783237966410285056
author Schmitz, Alexander M. Th.
Teixeira, Suzana C.
Pengel, Kenneth E.
Loo, Claudette E.
Vogel, Wouter V.
Wesseling, Jelle
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
Valdés Olmos, Renato A.
Sonke, Gabe S.
Rodenhuis, Sjoerd
Vrancken Peeters, Marie Jeanne T. F. D.
Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
author_facet Schmitz, Alexander M. Th.
Teixeira, Suzana C.
Pengel, Kenneth E.
Loo, Claudette E.
Vogel, Wouter V.
Wesseling, Jelle
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
Valdés Olmos, Renato A.
Sonke, Gabe S.
Rodenhuis, Sjoerd
Vrancken Peeters, Marie Jeanne T. F. D.
Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
author_sort Schmitz, Alexander M. Th.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore guidelines on the use of MRI and PET/CT monitoring primary tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), taking breast cancer subtype into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 188 women were included with stages II and III breast cancer. MRI and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were acquired before and during NAC. Baseline pathology was assessed from tumor biopsy. Tumors were stratified into HER2-positive, ER-positive/HER2-negative (ER-positive), and ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-negative (triple-negative) subtypes, and treated according to subtype. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCRmic) defined as no or only small numbers of scattered invasive tumor cells. We evaluated imaging scenarios using MRI only, PET/CT only, and combinations. RESULTS: pCRmic was found in 35/46 (76.1%) of HER2-positive, 11/87 (12.6%) of ER-positive, and 31/55 (56.4%) of triple-negative tumors. For HER2-positive tumors, MRI yielded the strongest predictor (AUC: 0.735; sensitivity 36.2%), outperforming PET/CT (AUC: 0.543; p = 0.04), and with comparable results to combined imaging (AUC: 0.708; p = 0.213). In ER-positive tumors, the combination of MRI and PET/CT was slightly superior (AUC: 0.818; sensitivity 55.8%) over MRI alone (AUC: 0.742; p = 0.117) and PET/CT alone (AUC: 0.791). However, even though relatively large numbers of ER-positive tumor patients were included, no significant differences were yet found. For triple-negative tumors, MRI (AUC: 0.855; sensitivity 45.4%), PET/CT (AUC: 0.844; p = 0.220) and combined imaging (AUC: 0.868; p = 0.213) yielded comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: For HER2-positive tumors, MRI shows significant advantage over PET/CT. For triple-negative tumors, comparable results were seen for MRI, PET/CT and combined imaging. For ER-positive tumors, combining MRI with PET/CT may result in optimal response monitoring, although not yet significantly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5439668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54396682017-06-06 Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes Schmitz, Alexander M. Th. Teixeira, Suzana C. Pengel, Kenneth E. Loo, Claudette E. Vogel, Wouter V. Wesseling, Jelle Rutgers, Emiel J. Th. Valdés Olmos, Renato A. Sonke, Gabe S. Rodenhuis, Sjoerd Vrancken Peeters, Marie Jeanne T. F. D. Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To explore guidelines on the use of MRI and PET/CT monitoring primary tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), taking breast cancer subtype into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 188 women were included with stages II and III breast cancer. MRI and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were acquired before and during NAC. Baseline pathology was assessed from tumor biopsy. Tumors were stratified into HER2-positive, ER-positive/HER2-negative (ER-positive), and ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-negative (triple-negative) subtypes, and treated according to subtype. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCRmic) defined as no or only small numbers of scattered invasive tumor cells. We evaluated imaging scenarios using MRI only, PET/CT only, and combinations. RESULTS: pCRmic was found in 35/46 (76.1%) of HER2-positive, 11/87 (12.6%) of ER-positive, and 31/55 (56.4%) of triple-negative tumors. For HER2-positive tumors, MRI yielded the strongest predictor (AUC: 0.735; sensitivity 36.2%), outperforming PET/CT (AUC: 0.543; p = 0.04), and with comparable results to combined imaging (AUC: 0.708; p = 0.213). In ER-positive tumors, the combination of MRI and PET/CT was slightly superior (AUC: 0.818; sensitivity 55.8%) over MRI alone (AUC: 0.742; p = 0.117) and PET/CT alone (AUC: 0.791). However, even though relatively large numbers of ER-positive tumor patients were included, no significant differences were yet found. For triple-negative tumors, MRI (AUC: 0.855; sensitivity 45.4%), PET/CT (AUC: 0.844; p = 0.220) and combined imaging (AUC: 0.868; p = 0.213) yielded comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: For HER2-positive tumors, MRI shows significant advantage over PET/CT. For triple-negative tumors, comparable results were seen for MRI, PET/CT and combined imaging. For ER-positive tumors, combining MRI with PET/CT may result in optimal response monitoring, although not yet significantly. Public Library of Science 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5439668/ /pubmed/28531188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176782 Text en © 2017 Schmitz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmitz, Alexander M. Th.
Teixeira, Suzana C.
Pengel, Kenneth E.
Loo, Claudette E.
Vogel, Wouter V.
Wesseling, Jelle
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
Valdés Olmos, Renato A.
Sonke, Gabe S.
Rodenhuis, Sjoerd
Vrancken Peeters, Marie Jeanne T. F. D.
Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes
title Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes
title_full Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes
title_fullStr Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes
title_short Monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer subtypes
title_sort monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using mri and (18)f-fdg pet/ct in breast cancer subtypes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176782
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzalexandermth monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT teixeirasuzanac monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT pengelkennethe monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT looclaudettee monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT vogelwouterv monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT wesselingjelle monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT rutgersemieljth monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT valdesolmosrenatoa monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT sonkegabes monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT rodenhuissjoerd monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT vranckenpeetersmariejeannetfd monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes
AT gilhuijskennethga monitoringtumorresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyusingmriand18ffdgpetctinbreastcancersubtypes