Cargando…
Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that can lead to painful and dysfunctional joints. Prolotherapy involves using injections to produce functional restoration of the soft tissues of the joint. Intra-articular injections are controversial because of the introduction of needles...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553139 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S127633 |
_version_ | 1783237982191353856 |
---|---|
author | Rezasoltani, Zahra Taheri, Mehrdad Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour Mohajerani, Seyed Amir |
author_facet | Rezasoltani, Zahra Taheri, Mehrdad Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour Mohajerani, Seyed Amir |
author_sort | Rezasoltani, Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that can lead to painful and dysfunctional joints. Prolotherapy involves using injections to produce functional restoration of the soft tissues of the joint. Intra-articular injections are controversial because of the introduction of needles into the articular capsule. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of periarticular versus intra-articular prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with knee OA. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single center, university hospital (Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran). METHODS: A total of 104 patients with chronic knee OA were enrolled. In the intra-articular group, 8 mL of 10% dextrose and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine were injected. Injections were repeated at 1 and 2 weeks after the first injection. In the periarticular group, 5 mL of 20% dextrose and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine were injected subcutaneously at 4 points in the periarticular area. Pain and disability, as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were recorded at each follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months post-injection. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the periarticular compared with the intra-articular group at the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-month visits but not at 1 month. Morning stiffness and difficulty in rising from sitting were improved in both groups and were not signifi-cantly different in the peri- and intra-articular groups. Pain, joint locking, and limitation scores were all improved in both groups. Difficulty in walking on flat surfaces or climbing stairs, and sitting and standing pain, were all improved in both groups from 1 to 5 months after treatment. LIMITATIONS: WOMAC scores are subjective and could be a limitation of the study. CONCLUSION: Periarticular prolotherapy has comparable effects on pain and disability due to knee OA to intra-articular injections, while avoiding risks of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5439936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54399362017-05-26 Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis Rezasoltani, Zahra Taheri, Mehrdad Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour Mohajerani, Seyed Amir J Pain Res Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that can lead to painful and dysfunctional joints. Prolotherapy involves using injections to produce functional restoration of the soft tissues of the joint. Intra-articular injections are controversial because of the introduction of needles into the articular capsule. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of periarticular versus intra-articular prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with knee OA. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single center, university hospital (Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran). METHODS: A total of 104 patients with chronic knee OA were enrolled. In the intra-articular group, 8 mL of 10% dextrose and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine were injected. Injections were repeated at 1 and 2 weeks after the first injection. In the periarticular group, 5 mL of 20% dextrose and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine were injected subcutaneously at 4 points in the periarticular area. Pain and disability, as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were recorded at each follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months post-injection. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the periarticular compared with the intra-articular group at the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-month visits but not at 1 month. Morning stiffness and difficulty in rising from sitting were improved in both groups and were not signifi-cantly different in the peri- and intra-articular groups. Pain, joint locking, and limitation scores were all improved in both groups. Difficulty in walking on flat surfaces or climbing stairs, and sitting and standing pain, were all improved in both groups from 1 to 5 months after treatment. LIMITATIONS: WOMAC scores are subjective and could be a limitation of the study. CONCLUSION: Periarticular prolotherapy has comparable effects on pain and disability due to knee OA to intra-articular injections, while avoiding risks of complications. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5439936/ /pubmed/28553139 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S127633 Text en © 2017 Rezasoltani et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Report Rezasoltani, Zahra Taheri, Mehrdad Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour Mohajerani, Seyed Amir Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
title | Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
title_full | Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
title_fullStr | Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
title_short | Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
title_sort | periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis |
topic | Clinical Trial Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553139 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S127633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rezasoltanizahra periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis AT taherimehrdad periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis AT mofradmortezakazempour periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis AT mohajeraniseyedamir periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis |