Cargando…

Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that can lead to painful and dysfunctional joints. Prolotherapy involves using injections to produce functional restoration of the soft tissues of the joint. Intra-articular injections are controversial because of the introduction of needles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezasoltani, Zahra, Taheri, Mehrdad, Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour, Mohajerani, Seyed Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553139
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S127633
_version_ 1783237982191353856
author Rezasoltani, Zahra
Taheri, Mehrdad
Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour
Mohajerani, Seyed Amir
author_facet Rezasoltani, Zahra
Taheri, Mehrdad
Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour
Mohajerani, Seyed Amir
author_sort Rezasoltani, Zahra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that can lead to painful and dysfunctional joints. Prolotherapy involves using injections to produce functional restoration of the soft tissues of the joint. Intra-articular injections are controversial because of the introduction of needles into the articular capsule. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of periarticular versus intra-articular prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with knee OA. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single center, university hospital (Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran). METHODS: A total of 104 patients with chronic knee OA were enrolled. In the intra-articular group, 8 mL of 10% dextrose and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine were injected. Injections were repeated at 1 and 2 weeks after the first injection. In the periarticular group, 5 mL of 20% dextrose and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine were injected subcutaneously at 4 points in the periarticular area. Pain and disability, as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were recorded at each follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months post-injection. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the periarticular compared with the intra-articular group at the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-month visits but not at 1 month. Morning stiffness and difficulty in rising from sitting were improved in both groups and were not signifi-cantly different in the peri- and intra-articular groups. Pain, joint locking, and limitation scores were all improved in both groups. Difficulty in walking on flat surfaces or climbing stairs, and sitting and standing pain, were all improved in both groups from 1 to 5 months after treatment. LIMITATIONS: WOMAC scores are subjective and could be a limitation of the study. CONCLUSION: Periarticular prolotherapy has comparable effects on pain and disability due to knee OA to intra-articular injections, while avoiding risks of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5439936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54399362017-05-26 Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis Rezasoltani, Zahra Taheri, Mehrdad Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour Mohajerani, Seyed Amir J Pain Res Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that can lead to painful and dysfunctional joints. Prolotherapy involves using injections to produce functional restoration of the soft tissues of the joint. Intra-articular injections are controversial because of the introduction of needles into the articular capsule. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of periarticular versus intra-articular prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with knee OA. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single center, university hospital (Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran). METHODS: A total of 104 patients with chronic knee OA were enrolled. In the intra-articular group, 8 mL of 10% dextrose and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine were injected. Injections were repeated at 1 and 2 weeks after the first injection. In the periarticular group, 5 mL of 20% dextrose and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine were injected subcutaneously at 4 points in the periarticular area. Pain and disability, as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were recorded at each follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months post-injection. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the periarticular compared with the intra-articular group at the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-month visits but not at 1 month. Morning stiffness and difficulty in rising from sitting were improved in both groups and were not signifi-cantly different in the peri- and intra-articular groups. Pain, joint locking, and limitation scores were all improved in both groups. Difficulty in walking on flat surfaces or climbing stairs, and sitting and standing pain, were all improved in both groups from 1 to 5 months after treatment. LIMITATIONS: WOMAC scores are subjective and could be a limitation of the study. CONCLUSION: Periarticular prolotherapy has comparable effects on pain and disability due to knee OA to intra-articular injections, while avoiding risks of complications. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5439936/ /pubmed/28553139 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S127633 Text en © 2017 Rezasoltani et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Rezasoltani, Zahra
Taheri, Mehrdad
Mofrad, Morteza Kazempour
Mohajerani, Seyed Amir
Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
title Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
title_full Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
title_short Periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
title_sort periarticular dextrose prolotherapy instead of intra-articular injection for pain and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553139
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S127633
work_keys_str_mv AT rezasoltanizahra periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis
AT taherimehrdad periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis
AT mofradmortezakazempour periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis
AT mohajeraniseyedamir periarticulardextroseprolotherapyinsteadofintraarticularinjectionforpainandfunctionalimprovementinkneeosteoarthritis