Cargando…

Relationships between heart rate target determined in different exercise testing in COPD patients to prescribed with individualized exercise training

BACKGROUND: It has been scientifically proven that pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise tolerance and facilitates the carrying out of daily physical activities. To optimize the physical and physiological benefits, it is necessary to individualize the training intensity for each patient. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fabre, Claudine, Chehere, Baptiste, Bart, Frédéric, Mucci, Patrick, Wallaert, Benoit, Grosbois, Jean Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553100
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S129889
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: It has been scientifically proven that pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise tolerance and facilitates the carrying out of daily physical activities. To optimize the physical and physiological benefits, it is necessary to individualize the training intensity for each patient. The aim of this study is to compare the heart rate (HR) responses to three exercise modalities measuring aerobic fitness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, in order to easily prescribe individual target HRs for endurance training. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Fifty COPD patients (mean age: 60.1±8.5 years) were included in the study. Each patient carried out a cardiopulmonary exercise test, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and a 6-minute stepper test (6MST). During these tests, HR was recorded continuously. After the cardiopulmonary exercise test, the HR was noted at the ventilatory threshold (VT) and at the end of the two exercise field tests (6MWT(peak) and 6MST(peak)). The values of the HR during the last 3 minutes of both field tests were averaged (6MWT(456) and 6MST(456)). Finally, the HR at 60% of the HR reserve was calculated with the values of the HR measured during 6MWT and 6MST (HRr(60%walk), HRr(60%step)). RESULTS: The HRs measured during the 6MST were significantly higher than those measured during the 6MWT. The HRr(60%step) was not significantly different from 6MWT(456) and 6MWT(peak) HR (P=0.51; P=0.48). A significant correlation was observed between 6MWT(456) and 6MWT(peak) (r=0.58). The 6MWT(456) and 6MWT(peak) HR were correlated with HRr(60%step) (r=0.68 and r=0.62). The VT could be determined in 28 patients. The HR(VT) was not different from 6MWT(456), 6MWT(peak), and HRr(60%step) (P=0.57, P=0.41 and P=0.88) and was correlated to 6MWT(456), 6MWT(peak), and HRr(60%step) (r=0.45, r=0.40, r=0.48). CONCLUSION: An individualized target HR for endurance training can be prescribed from the HR measured during routine tests, such as 6MWT or 6MST.