Cargando…

Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge

An important image processing step in spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging is the ability to reliably and accurately segment grey and white matter for tissue specific analysis. There are several semi- or fully-automated segmentation methods for cervical cord cross-sectional area measurement with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prados, Ferran, Ashburner, John, Blaiotta, Claudia, Brosch, Tom, Carballido-Gamio, Julio, Cardoso, Manuel Jorge, Conrad, Benjamin N., Datta, Esha, Dávid, Gergely, Leener, Benjamin De, Dupont, Sara M., Freund, Patrick, Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Gandini, Grussu, Francesco, Henry, Roland, Landman, Bennett A., Ljungberg, Emil, Lyttle, Bailey, Ourselin, Sebastien, Papinutto, Nico, Saporito, Salvatore, Schlaeger, Regina, Smith, Seth A., Summers, Paul, Tam, Roger, Yiannakas, Marios C., Zhu, Alyssa, Cohen-Adad, Julien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010
_version_ 1783238029756858368
author Prados, Ferran
Ashburner, John
Blaiotta, Claudia
Brosch, Tom
Carballido-Gamio, Julio
Cardoso, Manuel Jorge
Conrad, Benjamin N.
Datta, Esha
Dávid, Gergely
Leener, Benjamin De
Dupont, Sara M.
Freund, Patrick
Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Gandini
Grussu, Francesco
Henry, Roland
Landman, Bennett A.
Ljungberg, Emil
Lyttle, Bailey
Ourselin, Sebastien
Papinutto, Nico
Saporito, Salvatore
Schlaeger, Regina
Smith, Seth A.
Summers, Paul
Tam, Roger
Yiannakas, Marios C.
Zhu, Alyssa
Cohen-Adad, Julien
author_facet Prados, Ferran
Ashburner, John
Blaiotta, Claudia
Brosch, Tom
Carballido-Gamio, Julio
Cardoso, Manuel Jorge
Conrad, Benjamin N.
Datta, Esha
Dávid, Gergely
Leener, Benjamin De
Dupont, Sara M.
Freund, Patrick
Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Gandini
Grussu, Francesco
Henry, Roland
Landman, Bennett A.
Ljungberg, Emil
Lyttle, Bailey
Ourselin, Sebastien
Papinutto, Nico
Saporito, Salvatore
Schlaeger, Regina
Smith, Seth A.
Summers, Paul
Tam, Roger
Yiannakas, Marios C.
Zhu, Alyssa
Cohen-Adad, Julien
author_sort Prados, Ferran
collection PubMed
description An important image processing step in spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging is the ability to reliably and accurately segment grey and white matter for tissue specific analysis. There are several semi- or fully-automated segmentation methods for cervical cord cross-sectional area measurement with an excellent performance close or equal to the manual segmentation. However, grey matter segmentation is still challenging due to small cross-sectional size and shape, and active research is being conducted by several groups around the world in this field. Therefore a grey matter spinal cord segmentation challenge was organised to test different capabilities of various methods using the same multi-centre and multi-vendor dataset acquired with distinct 3D gradient-echo sequences. This challenge aimed to characterize the state-of-the-art in the field as well as identifying new opportunities for future improvements. Six different spinal cord grey matter segmentation methods developed independently by various research groups across the world and their performance were compared to manual segmentation outcomes, the present gold-standard. All algorithms provided good overall results for detecting the grey matter butterfly, albeit with variable performance in certain quality-of-segmentation metrics. The data have been made publicly available and the challenge web site remains open to new submissions. No modifications were introduced to any of the presented methods as a result of this challenge for the purposes of this publication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5440179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54401792017-05-31 Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge Prados, Ferran Ashburner, John Blaiotta, Claudia Brosch, Tom Carballido-Gamio, Julio Cardoso, Manuel Jorge Conrad, Benjamin N. Datta, Esha Dávid, Gergely Leener, Benjamin De Dupont, Sara M. Freund, Patrick Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Gandini Grussu, Francesco Henry, Roland Landman, Bennett A. Ljungberg, Emil Lyttle, Bailey Ourselin, Sebastien Papinutto, Nico Saporito, Salvatore Schlaeger, Regina Smith, Seth A. Summers, Paul Tam, Roger Yiannakas, Marios C. Zhu, Alyssa Cohen-Adad, Julien Neuroimage Article An important image processing step in spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging is the ability to reliably and accurately segment grey and white matter for tissue specific analysis. There are several semi- or fully-automated segmentation methods for cervical cord cross-sectional area measurement with an excellent performance close or equal to the manual segmentation. However, grey matter segmentation is still challenging due to small cross-sectional size and shape, and active research is being conducted by several groups around the world in this field. Therefore a grey matter spinal cord segmentation challenge was organised to test different capabilities of various methods using the same multi-centre and multi-vendor dataset acquired with distinct 3D gradient-echo sequences. This challenge aimed to characterize the state-of-the-art in the field as well as identifying new opportunities for future improvements. Six different spinal cord grey matter segmentation methods developed independently by various research groups across the world and their performance were compared to manual segmentation outcomes, the present gold-standard. All algorithms provided good overall results for detecting the grey matter butterfly, albeit with variable performance in certain quality-of-segmentation metrics. The data have been made publicly available and the challenge web site remains open to new submissions. No modifications were introduced to any of the presented methods as a result of this challenge for the purposes of this publication. Academic Press 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5440179/ /pubmed/28286318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prados, Ferran
Ashburner, John
Blaiotta, Claudia
Brosch, Tom
Carballido-Gamio, Julio
Cardoso, Manuel Jorge
Conrad, Benjamin N.
Datta, Esha
Dávid, Gergely
Leener, Benjamin De
Dupont, Sara M.
Freund, Patrick
Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Gandini
Grussu, Francesco
Henry, Roland
Landman, Bennett A.
Ljungberg, Emil
Lyttle, Bailey
Ourselin, Sebastien
Papinutto, Nico
Saporito, Salvatore
Schlaeger, Regina
Smith, Seth A.
Summers, Paul
Tam, Roger
Yiannakas, Marios C.
Zhu, Alyssa
Cohen-Adad, Julien
Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
title Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
title_full Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
title_fullStr Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
title_full_unstemmed Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
title_short Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
title_sort spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010
work_keys_str_mv AT pradosferran spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT ashburnerjohn spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT blaiottaclaudia spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT broschtom spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT carballidogamiojulio spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT cardosomanueljorge spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT conradbenjaminn spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT dattaesha spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT davidgergely spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT leenerbenjaminde spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT dupontsaram spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT freundpatrick spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT wheelerkingshottclaudiaamgandini spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT grussufrancesco spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT henryroland spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT landmanbennetta spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT ljungbergemil spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT lyttlebailey spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT ourselinsebastien spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT papinuttonico spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT saporitosalvatore spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT schlaegerregina spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT smithsetha spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT summerspaul spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT tamroger spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT yiannakasmariosc spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT zhualyssa spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge
AT cohenadadjulien spinalcordgreymattersegmentationchallenge