Cargando…
Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods
The sequencing of the transcriptomes of single-cells, or single-cell RNA-sequencing, has now become the dominant technology for the identification of novel cell types and for the study of stochastic gene expression. In recent years, various tools for analyzing single-cell RNA-sequencing data have be...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00062 |
_version_ | 1783238062886617088 |
---|---|
author | Dal Molin, Alessandra Baruzzo, Giacomo Di Camillo, Barbara |
author_facet | Dal Molin, Alessandra Baruzzo, Giacomo Di Camillo, Barbara |
author_sort | Dal Molin, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sequencing of the transcriptomes of single-cells, or single-cell RNA-sequencing, has now become the dominant technology for the identification of novel cell types and for the study of stochastic gene expression. In recent years, various tools for analyzing single-cell RNA-sequencing data have been proposed, many of them with the purpose of performing differentially expression analysis. In this work, we compare four different tools for single-cell RNA-sequencing differential expression, together with two popular methods originally developed for the analysis of bulk RNA-sequencing data, but largely applied to single-cell data. We discuss results obtained on two real and one synthetic dataset, along with considerations about the perspectives of single-cell differential expression analysis. In particular, we explore the methods performance in four different scenarios, mimicking different unimodal or bimodal distributions of the data, as characteristic of single-cell transcriptomics. We observed marked differences between the selected methods in terms of precision and recall, the number of detected differentially expressed genes and the overall performance. Globally, the results obtained in our study suggest that is difficult to identify a best performing tool and that efforts are needed to improve the methodologies for single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis and gain better accuracy of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5440469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54404692017-06-06 Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods Dal Molin, Alessandra Baruzzo, Giacomo Di Camillo, Barbara Front Genet Genetics The sequencing of the transcriptomes of single-cells, or single-cell RNA-sequencing, has now become the dominant technology for the identification of novel cell types and for the study of stochastic gene expression. In recent years, various tools for analyzing single-cell RNA-sequencing data have been proposed, many of them with the purpose of performing differentially expression analysis. In this work, we compare four different tools for single-cell RNA-sequencing differential expression, together with two popular methods originally developed for the analysis of bulk RNA-sequencing data, but largely applied to single-cell data. We discuss results obtained on two real and one synthetic dataset, along with considerations about the perspectives of single-cell differential expression analysis. In particular, we explore the methods performance in four different scenarios, mimicking different unimodal or bimodal distributions of the data, as characteristic of single-cell transcriptomics. We observed marked differences between the selected methods in terms of precision and recall, the number of detected differentially expressed genes and the overall performance. Globally, the results obtained in our study suggest that is difficult to identify a best performing tool and that efforts are needed to improve the methodologies for single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis and gain better accuracy of results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5440469/ /pubmed/28588607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00062 Text en Copyright © 2017 Dal Molin, Baruzzo and Di Camillo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Dal Molin, Alessandra Baruzzo, Giacomo Di Camillo, Barbara Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods |
title | Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods |
title_full | Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods |
title_fullStr | Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods |
title_short | Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods |
title_sort | single-cell rna-sequencing: assessment of differential expression analysis methods |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalmolinalessandra singlecellrnasequencingassessmentofdifferentialexpressionanalysismethods AT baruzzogiacomo singlecellrnasequencingassessmentofdifferentialexpressionanalysismethods AT dicamillobarbara singlecellrnasequencingassessmentofdifferentialexpressionanalysismethods |