Cargando…

Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Preoperative implant planning for breast reconstruction is often at risk of being changed perioperatively. This study examined which factors are associated with a change of implant selection. METHODS: Women who had unilateral two-stage breast reconstruction between 2002 and 2007 were stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riggio, Egidio, Ardoino, Ilaria, Richardson, Caroline E., Biganzoli, Elia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1261-z
_version_ 1783238078440144896
author Riggio, Egidio
Ardoino, Ilaria
Richardson, Caroline E.
Biganzoli, Elia
author_facet Riggio, Egidio
Ardoino, Ilaria
Richardson, Caroline E.
Biganzoli, Elia
author_sort Riggio, Egidio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preoperative implant planning for breast reconstruction is often at risk of being changed perioperatively. This study examined which factors are associated with a change of implant selection. METHODS: Women who had unilateral two-stage breast reconstruction between 2002 and 2007 were studied. Inclusion criteria were photographic evidence of preoperative skin markings indicating breast dimensions and a selected implant model. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with a changed selection. RESULTS: Among the 496 women studied, 308 preoperative implant choices (62.1%) were changed during surgery. A change in plan was significantly associated with symmetrization surgery involving contralateral reduction mammaplasty (OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.29) and contralateral mastopexy (OR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.96), but not with BMI. The required implant width changed more than 0.5 cm in 70 cases (14.1%) while height changed more than 0.5 cm in 215 cases (43.2%). The likelihood of a change was high for large preoperative widths (OR = 9.66 for 15.5 cm) and small preoperative heights (OR = 2.97 for 10.5 cm). At a mean follow-up of 16.6 months, patient satisfaction was good or average in 92.1% of cases and 5.9% of implants had been replaced with another model, indicating that the perioperative implant selection was usually appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the frequency with which implant choices, despite accurate preoperative planning, are changed perioperatively as a result of relatively small differences in anthropomorphic measurements. Perioperative recalculation of breast dimensions may have an advantage in terms of patient reoperation rates. Changes in width were less frequent than changes in height and projection. Contralateral surgery, large width, and small height were the most influential factors. Level of Evidence: Level IV, risk / prognostic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5440532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54405322017-06-08 Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study Riggio, Egidio Ardoino, Ilaria Richardson, Caroline E. Biganzoli, Elia Eur J Plast Surg Original Paper BACKGROUND: Preoperative implant planning for breast reconstruction is often at risk of being changed perioperatively. This study examined which factors are associated with a change of implant selection. METHODS: Women who had unilateral two-stage breast reconstruction between 2002 and 2007 were studied. Inclusion criteria were photographic evidence of preoperative skin markings indicating breast dimensions and a selected implant model. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with a changed selection. RESULTS: Among the 496 women studied, 308 preoperative implant choices (62.1%) were changed during surgery. A change in plan was significantly associated with symmetrization surgery involving contralateral reduction mammaplasty (OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.29) and contralateral mastopexy (OR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.96), but not with BMI. The required implant width changed more than 0.5 cm in 70 cases (14.1%) while height changed more than 0.5 cm in 215 cases (43.2%). The likelihood of a change was high for large preoperative widths (OR = 9.66 for 15.5 cm) and small preoperative heights (OR = 2.97 for 10.5 cm). At a mean follow-up of 16.6 months, patient satisfaction was good or average in 92.1% of cases and 5.9% of implants had been replaced with another model, indicating that the perioperative implant selection was usually appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the frequency with which implant choices, despite accurate preoperative planning, are changed perioperatively as a result of relatively small differences in anthropomorphic measurements. Perioperative recalculation of breast dimensions may have an advantage in terms of patient reoperation rates. Changes in width were less frequent than changes in height and projection. Contralateral surgery, large width, and small height were the most influential factors. Level of Evidence: Level IV, risk / prognostic study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5440532/ /pubmed/28603385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1261-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Riggio, Egidio
Ardoino, Ilaria
Richardson, Caroline E.
Biganzoli, Elia
Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
title Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1261-z
work_keys_str_mv AT riggioegidio predictabilityofanthropomorphicmeasurementsinimplantselectionforbreastreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ardoinoilaria predictabilityofanthropomorphicmeasurementsinimplantselectionforbreastreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT richardsoncarolinee predictabilityofanthropomorphicmeasurementsinimplantselectionforbreastreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT biganzolielia predictabilityofanthropomorphicmeasurementsinimplantselectionforbreastreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy