Cargando…
Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
BACKGROUND: United States college students, particularly those attending community colleges, have higher smoking rates than the national average. Recruitment of such smokers into research studies has not been studied in depth, despite a moderate amount information on study recruitment success with s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6485 |
_version_ | 1783238115628941312 |
---|---|
author | McIntosh, Scott Johnson, Tye Wall, Andrew F Prokhorov, Alexander V Calabro, Karen Sue Ververs, Duncan Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa Ossip, Deborah J |
author_facet | McIntosh, Scott Johnson, Tye Wall, Andrew F Prokhorov, Alexander V Calabro, Karen Sue Ververs, Duncan Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa Ossip, Deborah J |
author_sort | McIntosh, Scott |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: United States college students, particularly those attending community colleges, have higher smoking rates than the national average. Recruitment of such smokers into research studies has not been studied in depth, despite a moderate amount information on study recruitment success with smokers from traditional four-year colleges. Recruitment channels and success are evolving as technology evolves, so it is important to understand how to best target, implement, and evaluate recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to both qualitatively and quantitatively explore recruitment channels (eg, mass email, in-person referral, posted materials) and their success with enrollment into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention study in this priority population of underserved and understudied smokers. METHODS: Qualitative research methods included key informant interviews (n=18) and four focus groups (n=37). Quantitative research methods included observed online responsiveness to any channel (n=10,914), responses from those completing online screening and study consent (n=2696), and responses to a baseline questionnaire from the fully enrolled study participants (n=1452). RESULTS: Qualitative results prior to recruitment provided insights regarding the selection of a variety of recruitment channels proposed to be successful, and provided context for the unique attributes of the study sample. Quantitative analysis of self-reported channels used to engage with students, and to enroll participants into the study, revealed the relative utilization of channels at several recruitment points. The use of mass emails to the student body was reported by the final sample as the most influential channel, accounting for 60.54% (879/1452) of the total enrolled sample. CONCLUSIONS: Relative channel efficiency was analyzed across a wide variety of channels. One primary channel (mass emails) and a small number of secondary channels (including college websites and learning management systems) accounted for most of the recruitment success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692730; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01692730 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qEcFQN9Q) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5440736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54407362017-06-06 Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study McIntosh, Scott Johnson, Tye Wall, Andrew F Prokhorov, Alexander V Calabro, Karen Sue Ververs, Duncan Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa Ossip, Deborah J JMIR Res Protoc Original Paper BACKGROUND: United States college students, particularly those attending community colleges, have higher smoking rates than the national average. Recruitment of such smokers into research studies has not been studied in depth, despite a moderate amount information on study recruitment success with smokers from traditional four-year colleges. Recruitment channels and success are evolving as technology evolves, so it is important to understand how to best target, implement, and evaluate recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to both qualitatively and quantitatively explore recruitment channels (eg, mass email, in-person referral, posted materials) and their success with enrollment into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention study in this priority population of underserved and understudied smokers. METHODS: Qualitative research methods included key informant interviews (n=18) and four focus groups (n=37). Quantitative research methods included observed online responsiveness to any channel (n=10,914), responses from those completing online screening and study consent (n=2696), and responses to a baseline questionnaire from the fully enrolled study participants (n=1452). RESULTS: Qualitative results prior to recruitment provided insights regarding the selection of a variety of recruitment channels proposed to be successful, and provided context for the unique attributes of the study sample. Quantitative analysis of self-reported channels used to engage with students, and to enroll participants into the study, revealed the relative utilization of channels at several recruitment points. The use of mass emails to the student body was reported by the final sample as the most influential channel, accounting for 60.54% (879/1452) of the total enrolled sample. CONCLUSIONS: Relative channel efficiency was analyzed across a wide variety of channels. One primary channel (mass emails) and a small number of secondary channels (including college websites and learning management systems) accounted for most of the recruitment success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692730; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01692730 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qEcFQN9Q) JMIR Publications 2017-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5440736/ /pubmed/28483741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6485 Text en ©Scott McIntosh, Tye Johnson, Andrew F Wall, Alexander V Prokhorov, Karen Sue Calabro, Duncan Ververs, Vanessa Assibey-Mensah, Deborah J Ossip. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.05.2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper McIntosh, Scott Johnson, Tye Wall, Andrew F Prokhorov, Alexander V Calabro, Karen Sue Ververs, Duncan Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa Ossip, Deborah J Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study |
title | Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study |
title_full | Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study |
title_fullStr | Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study |
title_short | Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study |
title_sort | recruitment of community college students into a web-assisted tobacco intervention study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcintoshscott recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT johnsontye recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT wallandrewf recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT prokhorovalexanderv recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT calabrokarensue recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT verversduncan recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT assibeymensahvanessa recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy AT ossipdeborahj recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy |