Cargando…

Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study

BACKGROUND: United States college students, particularly those attending community colleges, have higher smoking rates than the national average. Recruitment of such smokers into research studies has not been studied in depth, despite a moderate amount information on study recruitment success with s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIntosh, Scott, Johnson, Tye, Wall, Andrew F, Prokhorov, Alexander V, Calabro, Karen Sue, Ververs, Duncan, Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa, Ossip, Deborah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483741
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6485
_version_ 1783238115628941312
author McIntosh, Scott
Johnson, Tye
Wall, Andrew F
Prokhorov, Alexander V
Calabro, Karen Sue
Ververs, Duncan
Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa
Ossip, Deborah J
author_facet McIntosh, Scott
Johnson, Tye
Wall, Andrew F
Prokhorov, Alexander V
Calabro, Karen Sue
Ververs, Duncan
Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa
Ossip, Deborah J
author_sort McIntosh, Scott
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: United States college students, particularly those attending community colleges, have higher smoking rates than the national average. Recruitment of such smokers into research studies has not been studied in depth, despite a moderate amount information on study recruitment success with smokers from traditional four-year colleges. Recruitment channels and success are evolving as technology evolves, so it is important to understand how to best target, implement, and evaluate recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to both qualitatively and quantitatively explore recruitment channels (eg, mass email, in-person referral, posted materials) and their success with enrollment into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention study in this priority population of underserved and understudied smokers. METHODS: Qualitative research methods included key informant interviews (n=18) and four focus groups (n=37). Quantitative research methods included observed online responsiveness to any channel (n=10,914), responses from those completing online screening and study consent (n=2696), and responses to a baseline questionnaire from the fully enrolled study participants (n=1452). RESULTS: Qualitative results prior to recruitment provided insights regarding the selection of a variety of recruitment channels proposed to be successful, and provided context for the unique attributes of the study sample. Quantitative analysis of self-reported channels used to engage with students, and to enroll participants into the study, revealed the relative utilization of channels at several recruitment points. The use of mass emails to the student body was reported by the final sample as the most influential channel, accounting for 60.54% (879/1452) of the total enrolled sample. CONCLUSIONS: Relative channel efficiency was analyzed across a wide variety of channels. One primary channel (mass emails) and a small number of secondary channels (including college websites and learning management systems) accounted for most of the recruitment success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692730; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01692730 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qEcFQN9Q)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5440736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54407362017-06-06 Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study McIntosh, Scott Johnson, Tye Wall, Andrew F Prokhorov, Alexander V Calabro, Karen Sue Ververs, Duncan Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa Ossip, Deborah J JMIR Res Protoc Original Paper BACKGROUND: United States college students, particularly those attending community colleges, have higher smoking rates than the national average. Recruitment of such smokers into research studies has not been studied in depth, despite a moderate amount information on study recruitment success with smokers from traditional four-year colleges. Recruitment channels and success are evolving as technology evolves, so it is important to understand how to best target, implement, and evaluate recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to both qualitatively and quantitatively explore recruitment channels (eg, mass email, in-person referral, posted materials) and their success with enrollment into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention study in this priority population of underserved and understudied smokers. METHODS: Qualitative research methods included key informant interviews (n=18) and four focus groups (n=37). Quantitative research methods included observed online responsiveness to any channel (n=10,914), responses from those completing online screening and study consent (n=2696), and responses to a baseline questionnaire from the fully enrolled study participants (n=1452). RESULTS: Qualitative results prior to recruitment provided insights regarding the selection of a variety of recruitment channels proposed to be successful, and provided context for the unique attributes of the study sample. Quantitative analysis of self-reported channels used to engage with students, and to enroll participants into the study, revealed the relative utilization of channels at several recruitment points. The use of mass emails to the student body was reported by the final sample as the most influential channel, accounting for 60.54% (879/1452) of the total enrolled sample. CONCLUSIONS: Relative channel efficiency was analyzed across a wide variety of channels. One primary channel (mass emails) and a small number of secondary channels (including college websites and learning management systems) accounted for most of the recruitment success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01692730; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01692730 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qEcFQN9Q) JMIR Publications 2017-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5440736/ /pubmed/28483741 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6485 Text en ©Scott McIntosh, Tye Johnson, Andrew F Wall, Alexander V Prokhorov, Karen Sue Calabro, Duncan Ververs, Vanessa Assibey-Mensah, Deborah J Ossip. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.05.2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
McIntosh, Scott
Johnson, Tye
Wall, Andrew F
Prokhorov, Alexander V
Calabro, Karen Sue
Ververs, Duncan
Assibey-Mensah, Vanessa
Ossip, Deborah J
Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
title Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
title_full Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
title_fullStr Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
title_short Recruitment of Community College Students Into a Web-Assisted Tobacco Intervention Study
title_sort recruitment of community college students into a web-assisted tobacco intervention study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5440736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483741
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.6485
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintoshscott recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT johnsontye recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT wallandrewf recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT prokhorovalexanderv recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT calabrokarensue recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT verversduncan recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT assibeymensahvanessa recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy
AT ossipdeborahj recruitmentofcommunitycollegestudentsintoawebassistedtobaccointerventionstudy