Cargando…

Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability

BACKGROUND: There is a need for objective movement assessment for clinical research trials aimed at improving gait and balance in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Wireless inertial sensors can accurately measure numerous walking and balance parameters but these measures require evaluation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, Jordan J., Bruetsch, Adam P., Lynch, Sharon G., Horak, Fay B., Huisinga, Jessie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28532417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0251-0
_version_ 1783238177346027520
author Craig, Jordan J.
Bruetsch, Adam P.
Lynch, Sharon G.
Horak, Fay B.
Huisinga, Jessie M.
author_facet Craig, Jordan J.
Bruetsch, Adam P.
Lynch, Sharon G.
Horak, Fay B.
Huisinga, Jessie M.
author_sort Craig, Jordan J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for objective movement assessment for clinical research trials aimed at improving gait and balance in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Wireless inertial sensors can accurately measure numerous walking and balance parameters but these measures require evaluation of reliability in PwMS. The current study determined the test-retest reliability of wireless inertial sensor measures obtained during an instrumented standing balance test and an instrumented Timed Up and Go test in PwMS. METHODS: Fifteen PwMS and 15 healthy control subjects (HC) performed an instrumented standing balance and instrumented Timed Up and Go (TUG) test on two separate days. Ten instrumented standing balance measures and 18 instrumented TUG measures were computed from the wireless sensor data. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine test-retest reliability of all instrumented standing balance and instrumented TUG measures. Correlations were evaluated between the instrumented standing balance and instrumented TUG measures and self-reported walking and balance performance, fall history, and clinical disability. RESULTS: For both groups, ICCs for instrumented standing balance measures were best for spatio-temporal measures, while frequency measures were less reliable. All instrumented TUG measures exhibited good to excellent (ICCs > 0.60) test-retest reliability in PwMS and in HC. There were no correlations between self-report walking and balance scores and instrumented TUG or instrumented standing balance metrics, but there were correlations between instrumented TUG and instrumented standing balance metrics and fall history and clinical disability status. CONCLUSIONS: Measures from the instrumented standing balance and instrumented TUG tests exhibit good to excellent reliability, demonstrating their potential as objective assessments for clinical trials. A subset of the most reliable measures is recommended for measuring walking and balance in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5441007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54410072017-05-24 Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability Craig, Jordan J. Bruetsch, Adam P. Lynch, Sharon G. Horak, Fay B. Huisinga, Jessie M. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: There is a need for objective movement assessment for clinical research trials aimed at improving gait and balance in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Wireless inertial sensors can accurately measure numerous walking and balance parameters but these measures require evaluation of reliability in PwMS. The current study determined the test-retest reliability of wireless inertial sensor measures obtained during an instrumented standing balance test and an instrumented Timed Up and Go test in PwMS. METHODS: Fifteen PwMS and 15 healthy control subjects (HC) performed an instrumented standing balance and instrumented Timed Up and Go (TUG) test on two separate days. Ten instrumented standing balance measures and 18 instrumented TUG measures were computed from the wireless sensor data. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine test-retest reliability of all instrumented standing balance and instrumented TUG measures. Correlations were evaluated between the instrumented standing balance and instrumented TUG measures and self-reported walking and balance performance, fall history, and clinical disability. RESULTS: For both groups, ICCs for instrumented standing balance measures were best for spatio-temporal measures, while frequency measures were less reliable. All instrumented TUG measures exhibited good to excellent (ICCs > 0.60) test-retest reliability in PwMS and in HC. There were no correlations between self-report walking and balance scores and instrumented TUG or instrumented standing balance metrics, but there were correlations between instrumented TUG and instrumented standing balance metrics and fall history and clinical disability status. CONCLUSIONS: Measures from the instrumented standing balance and instrumented TUG tests exhibit good to excellent reliability, demonstrating their potential as objective assessments for clinical trials. A subset of the most reliable measures is recommended for measuring walking and balance in clinical settings. BioMed Central 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5441007/ /pubmed/28532417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0251-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Craig, Jordan J.
Bruetsch, Adam P.
Lynch, Sharon G.
Horak, Fay B.
Huisinga, Jessie M.
Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
title Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
title_full Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
title_fullStr Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
title_full_unstemmed Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
title_short Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
title_sort instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28532417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0251-0
work_keys_str_mv AT craigjordanj instrumentedbalanceandwalkingassessmentsinpersonswithmultiplesclerosisshowstrongtestretestreliability
AT bruetschadamp instrumentedbalanceandwalkingassessmentsinpersonswithmultiplesclerosisshowstrongtestretestreliability
AT lynchsharong instrumentedbalanceandwalkingassessmentsinpersonswithmultiplesclerosisshowstrongtestretestreliability
AT horakfayb instrumentedbalanceandwalkingassessmentsinpersonswithmultiplesclerosisshowstrongtestretestreliability
AT huisingajessiem instrumentedbalanceandwalkingassessmentsinpersonswithmultiplesclerosisshowstrongtestretestreliability