Cargando…

Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton

BACKGROUND: Kinesthesia (sense of limb movement) has been extremely difficult to measure objectively, especially in individuals who have survived a stroke. The development of valid and reliable measurements for proprioception is important to developing a better understanding of proprioceptive impair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Semrau, Jennifer A., Herter, Troy M., Scott, Stephen H., Dukelow, Sean P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28532512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0260-z
_version_ 1783238189467566080
author Semrau, Jennifer A.
Herter, Troy M.
Scott, Stephen H.
Dukelow, Sean P.
author_facet Semrau, Jennifer A.
Herter, Troy M.
Scott, Stephen H.
Dukelow, Sean P.
author_sort Semrau, Jennifer A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kinesthesia (sense of limb movement) has been extremely difficult to measure objectively, especially in individuals who have survived a stroke. The development of valid and reliable measurements for proprioception is important to developing a better understanding of proprioceptive impairments after stroke and their impact on the ability to perform daily activities. We recently developed a robotic task to evaluate kinesthetic deficits after stroke and found that the majority (~60%) of stroke survivors exhibit significant deficits in kinesthesia within the first 10 days post-stroke. Here we aim to determine the inter-rater reliability of this robotic kinesthetic matching task. METHODS: Twenty-five neurologically intact control subjects and 15 individuals with first-time stroke were evaluated on a robotic kinesthetic matching task (KIN). Subjects sat in a robotic exoskeleton with their arms supported against gravity. In the KIN task, the robot moved the subjects’ stroke-affected arm at a preset speed, direction and distance. As soon as subjects felt the robot begin to move their affected arm, they matched the robot movement with the unaffected arm. Subjects were tested in two sessions on the KIN task: initial session and then a second session (within an average of 18.2 ± 13.8 h of the initial session for stroke subjects), which were supervised by different technicians. The task was performed both with and without the use of vision in both sessions. We evaluated intra-class correlations of spatial and temporal parameters derived from the KIN task to determine the reliability of the robotic task. RESULTS: We evaluated 8 spatial and temporal parameters that quantify kinesthetic behavior. We found that the parameters exhibited moderate to high intra-class correlations between the initial and retest conditions (Range, r-value = [0.53–0.97]). CONCLUSIONS: The robotic KIN task exhibited good inter-rater reliability. This validates the KIN task as a reliable, objective method for quantifying kinesthesia after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5441068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54410682017-05-24 Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton Semrau, Jennifer A. Herter, Troy M. Scott, Stephen H. Dukelow, Sean P. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Kinesthesia (sense of limb movement) has been extremely difficult to measure objectively, especially in individuals who have survived a stroke. The development of valid and reliable measurements for proprioception is important to developing a better understanding of proprioceptive impairments after stroke and their impact on the ability to perform daily activities. We recently developed a robotic task to evaluate kinesthetic deficits after stroke and found that the majority (~60%) of stroke survivors exhibit significant deficits in kinesthesia within the first 10 days post-stroke. Here we aim to determine the inter-rater reliability of this robotic kinesthetic matching task. METHODS: Twenty-five neurologically intact control subjects and 15 individuals with first-time stroke were evaluated on a robotic kinesthetic matching task (KIN). Subjects sat in a robotic exoskeleton with their arms supported against gravity. In the KIN task, the robot moved the subjects’ stroke-affected arm at a preset speed, direction and distance. As soon as subjects felt the robot begin to move their affected arm, they matched the robot movement with the unaffected arm. Subjects were tested in two sessions on the KIN task: initial session and then a second session (within an average of 18.2 ± 13.8 h of the initial session for stroke subjects), which were supervised by different technicians. The task was performed both with and without the use of vision in both sessions. We evaluated intra-class correlations of spatial and temporal parameters derived from the KIN task to determine the reliability of the robotic task. RESULTS: We evaluated 8 spatial and temporal parameters that quantify kinesthetic behavior. We found that the parameters exhibited moderate to high intra-class correlations between the initial and retest conditions (Range, r-value = [0.53–0.97]). CONCLUSIONS: The robotic KIN task exhibited good inter-rater reliability. This validates the KIN task as a reliable, objective method for quantifying kinesthesia after stroke. BioMed Central 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5441068/ /pubmed/28532512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0260-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Semrau, Jennifer A.
Herter, Troy M.
Scott, Stephen H.
Dukelow, Sean P.
Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton
title Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton
title_full Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton
title_fullStr Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton
title_full_unstemmed Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton
title_short Inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the KINARM robotic exoskeleton
title_sort inter-rater reliability of kinesthetic measurements with the kinarm robotic exoskeleton
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28532512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0260-z
work_keys_str_mv AT semraujennifera interraterreliabilityofkinestheticmeasurementswiththekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT hertertroym interraterreliabilityofkinestheticmeasurementswiththekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT scottstephenh interraterreliabilityofkinestheticmeasurementswiththekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT dukelowseanp interraterreliabilityofkinestheticmeasurementswiththekinarmroboticexoskeleton