Cargando…
The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot. METHODS: 230 consecutive diabetic patients (n = 459 limbs) were included. The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same invest...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2383651 |
_version_ | 1783238200208130048 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Jing Liu, Min Chen, Dawei Wang, Chun Liu, Guanjian Ran, Xingwu |
author_facet | Ma, Jing Liu, Min Chen, Dawei Wang, Chun Liu, Guanjian Ran, Xingwu |
author_sort | Ma, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot. METHODS: 230 consecutive diabetic patients (n = 459 limbs) were included. The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same investigator. The concordance and agreement were assessed by kappa index and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The average Doppler ABI was 1.003 ± 0.286 on the right and 0.990 ± 0.287 on the left, while oscillometric ABI was 1.002 ± 0.332 and 0.993 ± 0.319, which had no significance. The average time for oscillometric ABI was 8.600 versus 16.980 minutes for Doppler ABI (p < 0.001). There was good agreement between the two measurements, with a kappa value of 0.869 on the right and 0.919 on the left. Regarding the Doppler ABI as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and −LR of oscillometric ABI reached 95.22%, 94.34%, 95.48%, 20.873%, and 0.059% on the right. For the left, it was 96.94%, 96.43%, 97.11%, 33.364%, and 0.036%. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric measurement is a reliable, convenient, and less time-consuming alternative to standard Doppler ABI in patients. It should be widely used for PAD detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5441115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54411152017-06-01 The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot Ma, Jing Liu, Min Chen, Dawei Wang, Chun Liu, Guanjian Ran, Xingwu Int J Endocrinol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot. METHODS: 230 consecutive diabetic patients (n = 459 limbs) were included. The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same investigator. The concordance and agreement were assessed by kappa index and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The average Doppler ABI was 1.003 ± 0.286 on the right and 0.990 ± 0.287 on the left, while oscillometric ABI was 1.002 ± 0.332 and 0.993 ± 0.319, which had no significance. The average time for oscillometric ABI was 8.600 versus 16.980 minutes for Doppler ABI (p < 0.001). There was good agreement between the two measurements, with a kappa value of 0.869 on the right and 0.919 on the left. Regarding the Doppler ABI as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and −LR of oscillometric ABI reached 95.22%, 94.34%, 95.48%, 20.873%, and 0.059% on the right. For the left, it was 96.94%, 96.43%, 97.11%, 33.364%, and 0.036%. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric measurement is a reliable, convenient, and less time-consuming alternative to standard Doppler ABI in patients. It should be widely used for PAD detection. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5441115/ /pubmed/28572819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2383651 Text en Copyright © 2017 Jing Ma et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ma, Jing Liu, Min Chen, Dawei Wang, Chun Liu, Guanjian Ran, Xingwu The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot |
title | The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot |
title_full | The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot |
title_fullStr | The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot |
title_full_unstemmed | The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot |
title_short | The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot |
title_sort | validity and reliability between automated oscillometric measurement of ankle-brachial index and standard measurement by eco-doppler in diabetic patients with or without diabetic foot |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2383651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majing thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT liumin thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT chendawei thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT wangchun thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT liuguanjian thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT ranxingwu thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT majing validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT liumin validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT chendawei validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT wangchun validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT liuguanjian validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot AT ranxingwu validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot |