Cargando…

The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot. METHODS: 230 consecutive diabetic patients (n = 459 limbs) were included. The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Jing, Liu, Min, Chen, Dawei, Wang, Chun, Liu, Guanjian, Ran, Xingwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2383651
_version_ 1783238200208130048
author Ma, Jing
Liu, Min
Chen, Dawei
Wang, Chun
Liu, Guanjian
Ran, Xingwu
author_facet Ma, Jing
Liu, Min
Chen, Dawei
Wang, Chun
Liu, Guanjian
Ran, Xingwu
author_sort Ma, Jing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot. METHODS: 230 consecutive diabetic patients (n = 459 limbs) were included. The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same investigator. The concordance and agreement were assessed by kappa index and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The average Doppler ABI was 1.003 ± 0.286 on the right and 0.990 ± 0.287 on the left, while oscillometric ABI was 1.002 ± 0.332 and 0.993 ± 0.319, which had no significance. The average time for oscillometric ABI was 8.600 versus 16.980 minutes for Doppler ABI (p < 0.001). There was good agreement between the two measurements, with a kappa value of 0.869 on the right and 0.919 on the left. Regarding the Doppler ABI as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and −LR of oscillometric ABI reached 95.22%, 94.34%, 95.48%, 20.873%, and 0.059% on the right. For the left, it was 96.94%, 96.43%, 97.11%, 33.364%, and 0.036%. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric measurement is a reliable, convenient, and less time-consuming alternative to standard Doppler ABI in patients. It should be widely used for PAD detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5441115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54411152017-06-01 The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot Ma, Jing Liu, Min Chen, Dawei Wang, Chun Liu, Guanjian Ran, Xingwu Int J Endocrinol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between oscillometric ABI and standard Doppler ABI in diabetic Chinese patients with or without diabetic foot. METHODS: 230 consecutive diabetic patients (n = 459 limbs) were included. The right and left ABIs were determined with both devices by the same investigator. The concordance and agreement were assessed by kappa index and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The average Doppler ABI was 1.003 ± 0.286 on the right and 0.990 ± 0.287 on the left, while oscillometric ABI was 1.002 ± 0.332 and 0.993 ± 0.319, which had no significance. The average time for oscillometric ABI was 8.600 versus 16.980 minutes for Doppler ABI (p < 0.001). There was good agreement between the two measurements, with a kappa value of 0.869 on the right and 0.919 on the left. Regarding the Doppler ABI as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, +LR, and −LR of oscillometric ABI reached 95.22%, 94.34%, 95.48%, 20.873%, and 0.059% on the right. For the left, it was 96.94%, 96.43%, 97.11%, 33.364%, and 0.036%. CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric measurement is a reliable, convenient, and less time-consuming alternative to standard Doppler ABI in patients. It should be widely used for PAD detection. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5441115/ /pubmed/28572819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2383651 Text en Copyright © 2017 Jing Ma et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ma, Jing
Liu, Min
Chen, Dawei
Wang, Chun
Liu, Guanjian
Ran, Xingwu
The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
title The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
title_full The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
title_fullStr The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
title_full_unstemmed The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
title_short The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot
title_sort validity and reliability between automated oscillometric measurement of ankle-brachial index and standard measurement by eco-doppler in diabetic patients with or without diabetic foot
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2383651
work_keys_str_mv AT majing thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT liumin thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT chendawei thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT wangchun thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT liuguanjian thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT ranxingwu thevalidityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT majing validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT liumin validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT chendawei validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT wangchun validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT liuguanjian validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot
AT ranxingwu validityandreliabilitybetweenautomatedoscillometricmeasurementofanklebrachialindexandstandardmeasurementbyecodopplerindiabeticpatientswithorwithoutdiabeticfoot