Cargando…

Exploring peer-mentoring for community dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceptions of patients, physiotherapists, and potential peer mentors on the topic of peer-mentoring for self-management of chronic low back pain following discharge from physiotherapy. DESIGN: Exploratory, qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve patients, 11 potential pee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Kay, Schofield, Patricia, Klein, Susan, Smith, Blair H., Jehu, Llinos M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27613081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.005
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceptions of patients, physiotherapists, and potential peer mentors on the topic of peer-mentoring for self-management of chronic low back pain following discharge from physiotherapy. DESIGN: Exploratory, qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve patients, 11 potential peer mentors and 13 physiotherapists recruited from physiotherapy departments and community locations in one health board area of the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants’ perceptions of the usefulness and appropriateness of peer-mentoring following discharge from physiotherapy. Data were processed and analysed using the framework method. RESULTS: Four key themes were identified: (i) self-management strategies, (ii) barriers to self-management and peer-mentoring, (iii) vision of peer-mentoring, and (iv) the voice of experience. Peer-mentoring may be beneficial for some older adults with chronic low back pain. Barriers to peer-mentoring were identified, and many solutions for overcoming them. No single format was identified as superior; participants emphasised the need for any intervention to be flexible and individualised. Important aspects to consider in developing a peer-mentoring intervention are recruitment and training of peer mentors and monitoring the mentor–mentee relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study has generated important knowledge that is being used to design and test a peer-mentoring intervention on a group of older people with chronic low back pain and volunteer peer mentors. If successful, peer-mentoring could provide a cost effective method of facilitating longer-term self-management of a significant health condition in older people.