Cargando…

Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the volume, topics, and methodological nature of the existing research literature on research data management in academic institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching forty literature databases encompassing a broa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perrier, Laure, Blondal, Erik, Ayala, A. Patricia, Dearborn, Dylanne, Kenny, Tim, Lightfoot, David, Reka, Roger, Thuna, Mindy, Trimble, Leanne, MacDonald, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178261
_version_ 1783238299209433088
author Perrier, Laure
Blondal, Erik
Ayala, A. Patricia
Dearborn, Dylanne
Kenny, Tim
Lightfoot, David
Reka, Roger
Thuna, Mindy
Trimble, Leanne
MacDonald, Heather
author_facet Perrier, Laure
Blondal, Erik
Ayala, A. Patricia
Dearborn, Dylanne
Kenny, Tim
Lightfoot, David
Reka, Roger
Thuna, Mindy
Trimble, Leanne
MacDonald, Heather
author_sort Perrier, Laure
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the volume, topics, and methodological nature of the existing research literature on research data management in academic institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching forty literature databases encompassing a broad range of disciplines from inception to April 2016. We included all study types and data extracted on study design, discipline, data collection tools, and phase of the research data lifecycle. RESULTS: We included 301 articles plus 10 companion reports after screening 13,002 titles and abstracts and 654 full-text articles. Most articles (85%) were published from 2010 onwards and conducted within the sciences (86%). More than three-quarters of the articles (78%) reported methods that included interviews, cross-sectional, or case studies. Most articles (68%) included the Giving Access to Data phase of the UK Data Archive Research Data Lifecycle that examines activities such as sharing data. When studies were grouped into five dominant groupings (Stakeholder, Data, Library, Tool/Device, and Publication), data quality emerged as an integral element. CONCLUSION: Most studies relied on self-reports (interviews, surveys) or accounts from an observer (case studies) and we found few studies that collected empirical evidence on activities amongst data producers, particularly those examining the impact of research data management interventions. As well, fewer studies examined research data management at the early phases of research projects. The quality of all research outputs needs attention, from the application of best practices in research data management studies, to data producers depositing data in repositories for long-term use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5441653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54416532017-06-06 Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review Perrier, Laure Blondal, Erik Ayala, A. Patricia Dearborn, Dylanne Kenny, Tim Lightfoot, David Reka, Roger Thuna, Mindy Trimble, Leanne MacDonald, Heather PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the volume, topics, and methodological nature of the existing research literature on research data management in academic institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching forty literature databases encompassing a broad range of disciplines from inception to April 2016. We included all study types and data extracted on study design, discipline, data collection tools, and phase of the research data lifecycle. RESULTS: We included 301 articles plus 10 companion reports after screening 13,002 titles and abstracts and 654 full-text articles. Most articles (85%) were published from 2010 onwards and conducted within the sciences (86%). More than three-quarters of the articles (78%) reported methods that included interviews, cross-sectional, or case studies. Most articles (68%) included the Giving Access to Data phase of the UK Data Archive Research Data Lifecycle that examines activities such as sharing data. When studies were grouped into five dominant groupings (Stakeholder, Data, Library, Tool/Device, and Publication), data quality emerged as an integral element. CONCLUSION: Most studies relied on self-reports (interviews, surveys) or accounts from an observer (case studies) and we found few studies that collected empirical evidence on activities amongst data producers, particularly those examining the impact of research data management interventions. As well, fewer studies examined research data management at the early phases of research projects. The quality of all research outputs needs attention, from the application of best practices in research data management studies, to data producers depositing data in repositories for long-term use. Public Library of Science 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5441653/ /pubmed/28542450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178261 Text en © 2017 Perrier et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perrier, Laure
Blondal, Erik
Ayala, A. Patricia
Dearborn, Dylanne
Kenny, Tim
Lightfoot, David
Reka, Roger
Thuna, Mindy
Trimble, Leanne
MacDonald, Heather
Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review
title Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review
title_full Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review
title_fullStr Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review
title_short Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review
title_sort research data management in academic institutions: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178261
work_keys_str_mv AT perrierlaure researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT blondalerik researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT ayalaapatricia researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT dearborndylanne researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT kennytim researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT lightfootdavid researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT rekaroger researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT thunamindy researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT trimbleleanne researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview
AT macdonaldheather researchdatamanagementinacademicinstitutionsascopingreview