Cargando…
Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging
A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography technologists’ level of patient involvement, they are uniquely positioned to observe factors that affect patient comfort. The findings...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572739 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S129817 |
_version_ | 1783238302908809216 |
---|---|
author | Mendat, Christina C Mislan, Dave Hession-Kunz, Lisa |
author_facet | Mendat, Christina C Mislan, Dave Hession-Kunz, Lisa |
author_sort | Mendat, Christina C |
collection | PubMed |
description | A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography technologists’ level of patient involvement, they are uniquely positioned to observe factors that affect patient comfort. The findings suggest that according to technologists, multiple factors, including patient ethnicity, breast density, previous biopsy and lumpectomy experience, as well as psychological factors, impact breast discomfort during mammography. Additionally, with respect to imaging protocols, technologists attributed 80% of moderate-to-extreme discomfort to “length of compression time” (27%) and “compression force” (53%). Technologists also attributed “pinching at chest wall” and “hard edges of breast platform” to “very high” discomfort significantly more times (P<0.05) than “coolness and edges of paddle”. These findings confirm some of what has been reported to date and challenge other findings. Given that recent decline in breast cancer mortality has been attributed to improvements in early detection and treatment, approaches to reduce discomfort should be considered in order to promote screening compliance. Although more research is needed, it is apparent that the patient experience of comfort and pain during mammography is an area warranting increased research and solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5441667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54416672017-06-01 Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging Mendat, Christina C Mislan, Dave Hession-Kunz, Lisa Int J Womens Health Original Research A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography technologists’ level of patient involvement, they are uniquely positioned to observe factors that affect patient comfort. The findings suggest that according to technologists, multiple factors, including patient ethnicity, breast density, previous biopsy and lumpectomy experience, as well as psychological factors, impact breast discomfort during mammography. Additionally, with respect to imaging protocols, technologists attributed 80% of moderate-to-extreme discomfort to “length of compression time” (27%) and “compression force” (53%). Technologists also attributed “pinching at chest wall” and “hard edges of breast platform” to “very high” discomfort significantly more times (P<0.05) than “coolness and edges of paddle”. These findings confirm some of what has been reported to date and challenge other findings. Given that recent decline in breast cancer mortality has been attributed to improvements in early detection and treatment, approaches to reduce discomfort should be considered in order to promote screening compliance. Although more research is needed, it is apparent that the patient experience of comfort and pain during mammography is an area warranting increased research and solutions. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5441667/ /pubmed/28572739 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S129817 Text en © 2017 Mendat et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mendat, Christina C Mislan, Dave Hession-Kunz, Lisa Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
title | Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
title_full | Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
title_fullStr | Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
title_short | Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
title_sort | patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572739 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S129817 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mendatchristinac patientcomfortfromthetechnologistperspectivefactorstoconsiderinmammographicimaging AT mislandave patientcomfortfromthetechnologistperspectivefactorstoconsiderinmammographicimaging AT hessionkunzlisa patientcomfortfromthetechnologistperspectivefactorstoconsiderinmammographicimaging |