Cargando…

Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo

Fluorescent proteins have become essential tools for cell biologists. They are routinely used by plant biologists for protein and promoter fusions to infer protein localization, tissue‐specific expression and protein abundance. When studying the effects of biotic stress on chromatin, we unexpectedly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jonge, Jennifer, Hofius, Daniel, Hennig, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx031
_version_ 1783238316707020800
author de Jonge, Jennifer
Hofius, Daniel
Hennig, Lars
author_facet de Jonge, Jennifer
Hofius, Daniel
Hennig, Lars
author_sort de Jonge, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Fluorescent proteins have become essential tools for cell biologists. They are routinely used by plant biologists for protein and promoter fusions to infer protein localization, tissue‐specific expression and protein abundance. When studying the effects of biotic stress on chromatin, we unexpectedly observed a decrease in GFP signal intensity upon salicylic acid (SA) treatment in Arabidopsis lines expressing histone H1-GFP fusions. This GFP signal decrease was dependent on SA concentration. The effect was not specific to the linker histone H1-GFP fusion but was also observed for the nucleosomal histone H2A-GFP fusion. This result prompted us to investigate a collection of fusion proteins, which included different promoters, subcellular localizations and fluorophores. In all cases, fluorescence signals declined strongly or disappeared after SA application. No changes were detected in GFP‐fusion protein abundance when fluorescence signals were lost indicating that SA does not interfere with protein stability but GFP fluorescence. In vitro experiments showed that SA caused GFP fluorescence reduction only in vivo but not in vitro, suggesting that SA requires cellular components to cause fluorescence reduction. Together, we conclude that SA can interfere with the fluorescence of various GFP‐derived reporter constructs in vivo. Assays that measure relocation or turnover of GFP‐tagged proteins upon SA treatment should therefore be evaluated with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5441896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54418962017-05-30 Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo de Jonge, Jennifer Hofius, Daniel Hennig, Lars J Exp Bot Research Paper Fluorescent proteins have become essential tools for cell biologists. They are routinely used by plant biologists for protein and promoter fusions to infer protein localization, tissue‐specific expression and protein abundance. When studying the effects of biotic stress on chromatin, we unexpectedly observed a decrease in GFP signal intensity upon salicylic acid (SA) treatment in Arabidopsis lines expressing histone H1-GFP fusions. This GFP signal decrease was dependent on SA concentration. The effect was not specific to the linker histone H1-GFP fusion but was also observed for the nucleosomal histone H2A-GFP fusion. This result prompted us to investigate a collection of fusion proteins, which included different promoters, subcellular localizations and fluorophores. In all cases, fluorescence signals declined strongly or disappeared after SA application. No changes were detected in GFP‐fusion protein abundance when fluorescence signals were lost indicating that SA does not interfere with protein stability but GFP fluorescence. In vitro experiments showed that SA caused GFP fluorescence reduction only in vivo but not in vitro, suggesting that SA requires cellular components to cause fluorescence reduction. Together, we conclude that SA can interfere with the fluorescence of various GFP‐derived reporter constructs in vivo. Assays that measure relocation or turnover of GFP‐tagged proteins upon SA treatment should therefore be evaluated with caution. Oxford University Press 2017-03-01 2017-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5441896/ /pubmed/28369601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx031 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
de Jonge, Jennifer
Hofius, Daniel
Hennig, Lars
Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo
title Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo
title_full Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo
title_fullStr Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo
title_full_unstemmed Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo
title_short Salicylic acid interferes with GFP fluorescence in vivo
title_sort salicylic acid interferes with gfp fluorescence in vivo
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx031
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongejennifer salicylicacidinterfereswithgfpfluorescenceinvivo
AT hofiusdaniel salicylicacidinterfereswithgfpfluorescenceinvivo
AT henniglars salicylicacidinterfereswithgfpfluorescenceinvivo