Cargando…

Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?

The wild progenitors of major C(4) crops grew as individuals subjected to little shading. Today they are grown in dense stands where most leaves are shaded. Do they maintain photosynthetic efficiency in these low light conditions produced by modern cultivation? The apparent maximum quantum yield of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pignon, Charles P., Jaiswal, Deepak, McGrath, Justin M., Long, Stephen P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28110277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw456
_version_ 1783238318211727360
author Pignon, Charles P.
Jaiswal, Deepak
McGrath, Justin M.
Long, Stephen P.
author_facet Pignon, Charles P.
Jaiswal, Deepak
McGrath, Justin M.
Long, Stephen P.
author_sort Pignon, Charles P.
collection PubMed
description The wild progenitors of major C(4) crops grew as individuals subjected to little shading. Today they are grown in dense stands where most leaves are shaded. Do they maintain photosynthetic efficiency in these low light conditions produced by modern cultivation? The apparent maximum quantum yield of CO(2) assimilation [Formula: see text] a key determinant of light-limited photosynthesis, has not been systematically studied in field stands of C(4) crops. [Formula: see text] was derived from the initial slope of the response of leaf CO(2) uptake (A) to photon flux (Q). Leaf fractional light absorptance (α) was measured to determine the absolute maximum quantum yield of CO(2) assimilation on an absorbed light basis [Formula: see text] Light response curves were determined on sun and shade leaves of 49 field plants of Miscanthus × giganteus and Zea mays following canopy closure. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] declined significantly by 15–27% (P<0.05) with canopy depth. Experimentally, leaf age was shown unlikely to cause this loss. Modeling canopy CO(2) assimilation over diurnal courses suggested that the observed decline in [Formula: see text] with canopy depth costs 10% of potential carbon gain. Overcoming this limitation could substantially increase the productivity of major C(4) crops.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5441902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54419022017-05-30 Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops? Pignon, Charles P. Jaiswal, Deepak McGrath, Justin M. Long, Stephen P. J Exp Bot Research Paper The wild progenitors of major C(4) crops grew as individuals subjected to little shading. Today they are grown in dense stands where most leaves are shaded. Do they maintain photosynthetic efficiency in these low light conditions produced by modern cultivation? The apparent maximum quantum yield of CO(2) assimilation [Formula: see text] a key determinant of light-limited photosynthesis, has not been systematically studied in field stands of C(4) crops. [Formula: see text] was derived from the initial slope of the response of leaf CO(2) uptake (A) to photon flux (Q). Leaf fractional light absorptance (α) was measured to determine the absolute maximum quantum yield of CO(2) assimilation on an absorbed light basis [Formula: see text] Light response curves were determined on sun and shade leaves of 49 field plants of Miscanthus × giganteus and Zea mays following canopy closure. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] declined significantly by 15–27% (P<0.05) with canopy depth. Experimentally, leaf age was shown unlikely to cause this loss. Modeling canopy CO(2) assimilation over diurnal courses suggested that the observed decline in [Formula: see text] with canopy depth costs 10% of potential carbon gain. Overcoming this limitation could substantially increase the productivity of major C(4) crops. Oxford University Press 2017-01-21 2017-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5441902/ /pubmed/28110277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw456 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Pignon, Charles P.
Jaiswal, Deepak
McGrath, Justin M.
Long, Stephen P.
Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?
title Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?
title_full Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?
title_fullStr Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?
title_full_unstemmed Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?
title_short Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C(4) crops?
title_sort loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. an achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive c(4) crops?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5441902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28110277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw456
work_keys_str_mv AT pignoncharlesp lossofphotosyntheticefficiencyintheshadeanachillesheelforthedensemodernstandsofourmostproductivec4crops
AT jaiswaldeepak lossofphotosyntheticefficiencyintheshadeanachillesheelforthedensemodernstandsofourmostproductivec4crops
AT mcgrathjustinm lossofphotosyntheticefficiencyintheshadeanachillesheelforthedensemodernstandsofourmostproductivec4crops
AT longstephenp lossofphotosyntheticefficiencyintheshadeanachillesheelforthedensemodernstandsofourmostproductivec4crops