Cargando…
Whose Art Are We Talking About?
Jeannette Pols and Tamar Sharon kindly reviewed my case study of the art of living with technology as an engagement with technomoral change. I am indebted to them for their careful reading and critical suggestions to further elaborate the project. In my response I focus on the question whose art we...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9451-x |
_version_ | 1783238363577319424 |
---|---|
author | Kamphof, Ike |
author_facet | Kamphof, Ike |
author_sort | Kamphof, Ike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Jeannette Pols and Tamar Sharon kindly reviewed my case study of the art of living with technology as an engagement with technomoral change. I am indebted to them for their careful reading and critical suggestions to further elaborate the project. In my response I focus on the question whose art we are talking about, while further elucidating the reflexivity addressed in my essay. I conclude with some remarks on what we can learn from micro studies like the one presented for macro level thinking on the ‘art of becoming’ with technology in a surveillance society. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5442225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54422252017-06-09 Whose Art Are We Talking About? Kamphof, Ike Found Sci Reply Jeannette Pols and Tamar Sharon kindly reviewed my case study of the art of living with technology as an engagement with technomoral change. I am indebted to them for their careful reading and critical suggestions to further elaborate the project. In my response I focus on the question whose art we are talking about, while further elucidating the reflexivity addressed in my essay. I conclude with some remarks on what we can learn from micro studies like the one presented for macro level thinking on the ‘art of becoming’ with technology in a surveillance society. Springer Netherlands 2015-10-29 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5442225/ /pubmed/28603448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9451-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Reply Kamphof, Ike Whose Art Are We Talking About? |
title | Whose Art Are We Talking About? |
title_full | Whose Art Are We Talking About? |
title_fullStr | Whose Art Are We Talking About? |
title_full_unstemmed | Whose Art Are We Talking About? |
title_short | Whose Art Are We Talking About? |
title_sort | whose art are we talking about? |
topic | Reply |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9451-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamphofike whoseartarewetalkingabout |