Cargando…
Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition
BACKGROUND: In Australia people with a diagnosed chronic condition can be managed on unique funded care plans that allow the recruitment of a multidisciplinary team to assist in setting treatment goals and adequate follow up. In contrast to the World Health Organisation, the North American and Europ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4434-1 |
_version_ | 1783238428296478720 |
---|---|
author | Opie, C. A. Haines, H. M. Ervin, K. E. Glenister, K. Pierce, D. |
author_facet | Opie, C. A. Haines, H. M. Ervin, K. E. Glenister, K. Pierce, D. |
author_sort | Opie, C. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Australia people with a diagnosed chronic condition can be managed on unique funded care plans that allow the recruitment of a multidisciplinary team to assist in setting treatment goals and adequate follow up. In contrast to the World Health Organisation, the North American and European Medical Associations, the Australian Medical Association does not recognise obesity as a chronic condition, therefore excluding a diagnosis of obesity from qualifying for a structured and funded treatment plan. BODY: The Australian guidelines for management of Obesity in adults in Primary Care are structured around a five step process -the ‘5As’: Ask & Assess, Advise, Assist and Arrange’. This article aims to identify the key challenges and successes associated with the ‘5As’ approach, to better understand the reasons for the gap between the high Australian prevalence of overweight and obesity and an actual diagnosis and treatment plan for managing obesity. It argues that until the Australian health system follows the international lead and defines obesity as a chronic condition, the capacity for Australian doctors to diagnose and initiate structured treatment plans will remain limited and ineffective. CONCLUSION: Australian General Practitioners are limited in their ability manage obesity, as the current treatment guidelines only recognise obesity as a risk factor rather than a chronic condition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5442589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54425892017-05-25 Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition Opie, C. A. Haines, H. M. Ervin, K. E. Glenister, K. Pierce, D. BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: In Australia people with a diagnosed chronic condition can be managed on unique funded care plans that allow the recruitment of a multidisciplinary team to assist in setting treatment goals and adequate follow up. In contrast to the World Health Organisation, the North American and European Medical Associations, the Australian Medical Association does not recognise obesity as a chronic condition, therefore excluding a diagnosis of obesity from qualifying for a structured and funded treatment plan. BODY: The Australian guidelines for management of Obesity in adults in Primary Care are structured around a five step process -the ‘5As’: Ask & Assess, Advise, Assist and Arrange’. This article aims to identify the key challenges and successes associated with the ‘5As’ approach, to better understand the reasons for the gap between the high Australian prevalence of overweight and obesity and an actual diagnosis and treatment plan for managing obesity. It argues that until the Australian health system follows the international lead and defines obesity as a chronic condition, the capacity for Australian doctors to diagnose and initiate structured treatment plans will remain limited and ineffective. CONCLUSION: Australian General Practitioners are limited in their ability manage obesity, as the current treatment guidelines only recognise obesity as a risk factor rather than a chronic condition. BioMed Central 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5442589/ /pubmed/28535781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4434-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Opie, C. A. Haines, H. M. Ervin, K. E. Glenister, K. Pierce, D. Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
title | Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
title_full | Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
title_fullStr | Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
title_short | Why Australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
title_sort | why australia needs to define obesity as a chronic condition |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4434-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opieca whyaustralianeedstodefineobesityasachroniccondition AT haineshm whyaustralianeedstodefineobesityasachroniccondition AT ervinke whyaustralianeedstodefineobesityasachroniccondition AT glenisterk whyaustralianeedstodefineobesityasachroniccondition AT pierced whyaustralianeedstodefineobesityasachroniccondition |