Cargando…

Does the placebo effect modulate drug bioavailability? Randomized cross-over studies of three drugs

BACKGROUND: Medication effect is the sum of its drug, placebo, and drug*placebo interaction effects. It is conceivable that the interaction effect involves modulating drug bioavailability; it was previously observed that being aware of caffeine ingestion may prolong caffeine plasma half-life. This s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammami, Muhammad M, Yusuf, Ahmed, Shire, Faduma S., Hussein, Rajaa, Al-Swayeh, Reem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12952-017-0075-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Medication effect is the sum of its drug, placebo, and drug*placebo interaction effects. It is conceivable that the interaction effect involves modulating drug bioavailability; it was previously observed that being aware of caffeine ingestion may prolong caffeine plasma half-life. This study was set to evaluate such concept using different drugs. METHODS: Balanced single-dose, two-period, two-group, cross-over design was used to compare the pharmacokinetics of oral cephalexin, ibuprofen, and paracetamol, each described by its name (overt) or as placebo (covert). Volunteers and study coordinators were deceived as to study aim. Drug concentrations were determined blindly by in-house, high performance liquid chromatography assays. Terminal-elimination half-life (t(½)) (primary outcome), maximum concentration (C(max)), C(max) first time (T(max)), terminal-elimination-rate constant (λ), area-under-the-concentration-time-curve, to last measured concentration (AUC(T)), extrapolated to infinity (AUC(I)), or to T(max) of overt drug (AUC(Overttmax)), and C(max)/AUC(I) were calculated blindly using standard non-compartmental method. Covert-vs-overt effect on drug pharmacokinetics was evaluated by analysis-of-variance (ANOVA, primary analysis), 90% confidence interval (CI) using the 80.00–125.00% bioequivalence range, and percentage of individual pharmacokinetic covert/overt ratios that are outside the +25% range. RESULTS: Fifty, 30, and 50 healthy volunteers (18%, 10%, and 6% females, mean (SD) age 30.8 (6.2), 31.4 (6.6), and 31.2 (5.4) years) participated in 3 studies on cephalexin, ibuprofen, and paracetamol, respectively. Withdrawal rate was 4%, 0%, and 4%, respectively. Eighteen blood samples were obtained over 6, 10, and 14 h in each study period of the three drugs, respectively. ANOVA showed no significant difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter for any of the drugs. The 90% CIs for AUC(T), AUC(I), C(max), AUC(Overttmax), and C(max)/AUC(I) were within the bioequivalence range, except for ibuprofen C(max) (76.66–98.99), ibuprofen C(max)/AUC(I) (77.19–98.39), and ibuprofen (45.32–91.62) and paracetamol (51.45–98.96) AUC(Overttmax). Out of the 126 individual covert/overt ratios, 2.0–16.7% were outside the +25% range for AUC(T), 2.0–4.2% for AUC(I), 25.0–44.9% for C(max), 67.3–76.7% for AUC(Overttmax), and 45.8–71.4% for T(max). CONCLUSIONS: This study couldn’t confirm that awareness of drug ingestion modulates its bioavailability. However, it demonstrates the trivial effect of blinding in bioequivalence studies and the extent of bio-variability that would be expected when comparing a drug product to itself. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01501747 (registered Dec 26, 2011).