Cargando…
Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data
BACKGROUND: Emergency diagnosis of cancer is common and aetiologically complex. The proportion of emergency presenters who have consulted previously with relevant symptoms is uncertain. AIM: To examine how many patients with cancer, who were diagnosed as emergencies, have had previous primary care c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X690869 |
_version_ | 1783238498477670400 |
---|---|
author | Abel, Gary A Mendonca, Silvia C McPhail, Sean Zhou, Yin Elliss-Brookes, Lucy Lyratzopoulos, Georgios |
author_facet | Abel, Gary A Mendonca, Silvia C McPhail, Sean Zhou, Yin Elliss-Brookes, Lucy Lyratzopoulos, Georgios |
author_sort | Abel, Gary A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergency diagnosis of cancer is common and aetiologically complex. The proportion of emergency presenters who have consulted previously with relevant symptoms is uncertain. AIM: To examine how many patients with cancer, who were diagnosed as emergencies, have had previous primary care consultations with relevant symptoms; and among those, to examine how many had multiple consultations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of patient survey data from the 2010 English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), previously linked to population-based data on diagnostic route. METHOD: For emergency presenters with 18 different cancers, associations were examined for two outcomes (prior GP consultation status; and ‘three or more consultations’ among prior consultees) using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 4647 emergency presenters, 1349 (29%) reported no prior consultations, being more common in males (32% versus 25% in females, P<0.001), older (44% in ≥85 versus 30% in 65–74-year-olds, P<0.001), and the most deprived (35% versus 25% least deprived, P = 0.001) patients; and highest/lowest for patients with brain cancer (46%) and mesothelioma (13%), respectively (P<0.001 for overall variation by cancer site). Among 3298 emergency presenters with prior consultations, 1356 (41%) had three or more consultations, which were more likely in females (P<0.001), younger (P<0.001), and non-white patients (P = 0.017) and those with multiple myeloma, and least likely for patients with leukaemia (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Contrary to suggestions that emergency presentations represent missed diagnoses, about one-third of emergency presenters (particularly those in older and more deprived groups) have no prior GP consultations. Furthermore, only about one-third report multiple (three or more) consultations, which are more likely in ‘harder-to-suspect’ groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5442953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54429532017-06-02 Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data Abel, Gary A Mendonca, Silvia C McPhail, Sean Zhou, Yin Elliss-Brookes, Lucy Lyratzopoulos, Georgios Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Emergency diagnosis of cancer is common and aetiologically complex. The proportion of emergency presenters who have consulted previously with relevant symptoms is uncertain. AIM: To examine how many patients with cancer, who were diagnosed as emergencies, have had previous primary care consultations with relevant symptoms; and among those, to examine how many had multiple consultations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of patient survey data from the 2010 English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), previously linked to population-based data on diagnostic route. METHOD: For emergency presenters with 18 different cancers, associations were examined for two outcomes (prior GP consultation status; and ‘three or more consultations’ among prior consultees) using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 4647 emergency presenters, 1349 (29%) reported no prior consultations, being more common in males (32% versus 25% in females, P<0.001), older (44% in ≥85 versus 30% in 65–74-year-olds, P<0.001), and the most deprived (35% versus 25% least deprived, P = 0.001) patients; and highest/lowest for patients with brain cancer (46%) and mesothelioma (13%), respectively (P<0.001 for overall variation by cancer site). Among 3298 emergency presenters with prior consultations, 1356 (41%) had three or more consultations, which were more likely in females (P<0.001), younger (P<0.001), and non-white patients (P = 0.017) and those with multiple myeloma, and least likely for patients with leukaemia (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Contrary to suggestions that emergency presentations represent missed diagnoses, about one-third of emergency presenters (particularly those in older and more deprived groups) have no prior GP consultations. Furthermore, only about one-third report multiple (three or more) consultations, which are more likely in ‘harder-to-suspect’ groups. Royal College of General Practitioners 2017-06 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5442953/ /pubmed/28438775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X690869 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2017 This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Abel, Gary A Mendonca, Silvia C McPhail, Sean Zhou, Yin Elliss-Brookes, Lucy Lyratzopoulos, Georgios Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
title | Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
title_full | Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
title_fullStr | Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
title_short | Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
title_sort | emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X690869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abelgarya emergencydiagnosisofcancerandpreviousgeneralpracticeconsultationsinsightsfromlinkedpatientsurveydata AT mendoncasilviac emergencydiagnosisofcancerandpreviousgeneralpracticeconsultationsinsightsfromlinkedpatientsurveydata AT mcphailsean emergencydiagnosisofcancerandpreviousgeneralpracticeconsultationsinsightsfromlinkedpatientsurveydata AT zhouyin emergencydiagnosisofcancerandpreviousgeneralpracticeconsultationsinsightsfromlinkedpatientsurveydata AT ellissbrookeslucy emergencydiagnosisofcancerandpreviousgeneralpracticeconsultationsinsightsfromlinkedpatientsurveydata AT lyratzopoulosgeorgios emergencydiagnosisofcancerandpreviousgeneralpracticeconsultationsinsightsfromlinkedpatientsurveydata |