Cargando…

Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the hemodynamic status and predicting fluid responsiveness are important in critical ultrasound assessment of shock patients. Transthoracic echocardiography with noninvasive diagnostic parameters allows the assessment of volume responsiveness. This study aimed to assess the he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Wei, Wang, Xiao-Ting, Long, Yun, Liu, Da-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28485321
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.205848
_version_ 1783238509522321408
author Du, Wei
Wang, Xiao-Ting
Long, Yun
Liu, Da-Wei
author_facet Du, Wei
Wang, Xiao-Ting
Long, Yun
Liu, Da-Wei
author_sort Du, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluating the hemodynamic status and predicting fluid responsiveness are important in critical ultrasound assessment of shock patients. Transthoracic echocardiography with noninvasive diagnostic parameters allows the assessment of volume responsiveness. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic changes in the liver and systemic hemodynamic changes during fluid challenge and during passive leg raising (PLR) by measuring hepatic venous flow (HVF) velocity. METHODS: This is an open-label study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Shock patients with hypoperfusion who required fluid challenge were selected for the study. Patients <18 years old and those with contraindications to PLR were excluded from the study. Baseline values were measured, PLR tests were performed, and 500 ml of saline was infused over 30 min. Parameters associated with cardiac output (CO) in the left ventricular outflow tract were measured using the Doppler method. In addition, HVF velocity and right ventricular function parameters were determined. RESULTS: Middle hepatic venous (MHV) S-wave velocity was positively correlated in all patients with CO at baseline (r = 0.706, P < 0.01) and after volume expansion (r = 0.524, P = 0.003). CO was also significantly correlated with MHV S-wave velocity in responders (r = 0.608, P < 0.01). During PLR, however, hepatic venous S-wave velocity did not correlate with CO. For the parameter ΔMHV D (increase in change in MHV D-wave velocity after volume expansion), defined as (MHV D(afterVE) − MHV D(Baseline))/MHV D(Baseline) × 100%, >21% indicated no fluid responsiveness, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.918. CONCLUSIONS: During fluid expansion, hepatic venous S-wave velocity can be used to monitor CO, whether or not it is increasing. ΔMHV D ≥21% indicated a lack of fluid responsiveness, thus helping to decide when to stop infusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5443027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54430272017-06-05 Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness Du, Wei Wang, Xiao-Ting Long, Yun Liu, Da-Wei Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Evaluating the hemodynamic status and predicting fluid responsiveness are important in critical ultrasound assessment of shock patients. Transthoracic echocardiography with noninvasive diagnostic parameters allows the assessment of volume responsiveness. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic changes in the liver and systemic hemodynamic changes during fluid challenge and during passive leg raising (PLR) by measuring hepatic venous flow (HVF) velocity. METHODS: This is an open-label study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Shock patients with hypoperfusion who required fluid challenge were selected for the study. Patients <18 years old and those with contraindications to PLR were excluded from the study. Baseline values were measured, PLR tests were performed, and 500 ml of saline was infused over 30 min. Parameters associated with cardiac output (CO) in the left ventricular outflow tract were measured using the Doppler method. In addition, HVF velocity and right ventricular function parameters were determined. RESULTS: Middle hepatic venous (MHV) S-wave velocity was positively correlated in all patients with CO at baseline (r = 0.706, P < 0.01) and after volume expansion (r = 0.524, P = 0.003). CO was also significantly correlated with MHV S-wave velocity in responders (r = 0.608, P < 0.01). During PLR, however, hepatic venous S-wave velocity did not correlate with CO. For the parameter ΔMHV D (increase in change in MHV D-wave velocity after volume expansion), defined as (MHV D(afterVE) − MHV D(Baseline))/MHV D(Baseline) × 100%, >21% indicated no fluid responsiveness, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.918. CONCLUSIONS: During fluid expansion, hepatic venous S-wave velocity can be used to monitor CO, whether or not it is increasing. ΔMHV D ≥21% indicated a lack of fluid responsiveness, thus helping to decide when to stop infusions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5443027/ /pubmed/28485321 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.205848 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Du, Wei
Wang, Xiao-Ting
Long, Yun
Liu, Da-Wei
Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
title Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
title_full Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
title_fullStr Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
title_short Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
title_sort monitoring changes in hepatic venous velocities flow after a fluid challenge can identify shock patients who lack fluid responsiveness
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28485321
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.205848
work_keys_str_mv AT duwei monitoringchangesinhepaticvenousvelocitiesflowafterafluidchallengecanidentifyshockpatientswholackfluidresponsiveness
AT wangxiaoting monitoringchangesinhepaticvenousvelocitiesflowafterafluidchallengecanidentifyshockpatientswholackfluidresponsiveness
AT longyun monitoringchangesinhepaticvenousvelocitiesflowafterafluidchallengecanidentifyshockpatientswholackfluidresponsiveness
AT liudawei monitoringchangesinhepaticvenousvelocitiesflowafterafluidchallengecanidentifyshockpatientswholackfluidresponsiveness