Cargando…

Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is associated with improved recovery and similar cancer outcomes at 3 and 5 years in comparison with open surgery. However, long-term survival rates have rarely been reported. Here, we present survival and recurrence rates of the Dutch patients inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deijen, Charlotte L., Vasmel, Jeanine E., de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M., Cuesta, Miguel A., Coene, Peter-Paul L. O., Lange, Johan F., Meijerink, W. J. H. Jeroen, Jakimowicz, Jack J., Jeekel, Johannes, Kazemier, Geert, Janssen, Ignace M. C., Påhlman, Lars, Haglind, Eva, Bonjer, H. Jaap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6
_version_ 1783238633105391616
author Deijen, Charlotte L.
Vasmel, Jeanine E.
de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
Cuesta, Miguel A.
Coene, Peter-Paul L. O.
Lange, Johan F.
Meijerink, W. J. H. Jeroen
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Jeekel, Johannes
Kazemier, Geert
Janssen, Ignace M. C.
Påhlman, Lars
Haglind, Eva
Bonjer, H. Jaap
author_facet Deijen, Charlotte L.
Vasmel, Jeanine E.
de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
Cuesta, Miguel A.
Coene, Peter-Paul L. O.
Lange, Johan F.
Meijerink, W. J. H. Jeroen
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Jeekel, Johannes
Kazemier, Geert
Janssen, Ignace M. C.
Påhlman, Lars
Haglind, Eva
Bonjer, H. Jaap
author_sort Deijen, Charlotte L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is associated with improved recovery and similar cancer outcomes at 3 and 5 years in comparison with open surgery. However, long-term survival rates have rarely been reported. Here, we present survival and recurrence rates of the Dutch patients included in the COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial at 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Between March 1997 and March 2003, patients with non-metastatic colon cancer were recruited by 29 hospitals in eight countries and randomised to either laparoscopic or open surgery. Main inclusion criterion for the COLOR trial was solitary adenocarcinoma of the left or right colon. The primary outcome was disease-free survival at 3 years, and secondary outcomes included overall survival and recurrence. The 10-year follow-up data of all Dutch patients were collected. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00387842). RESULTS: In total, 1248 patients were randomised, of which 329 were Dutch. Fifty-eight Dutch patients were excluded and 15 were lost to follow-up, leaving 256 patients for 10-year analysis. Median follow-up was 112 months. Disease-free survival rates were 45.2 % in the laparoscopic group and 43.2 % in the open group (difference 2.0 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) −10.3 to 14.3; p = 0.96). Overall survival rates were 48.4 and 46.7 %, respectively (difference 1.7 %; 95 % CI −10.6 to 14.0; p = 0.83). Stage-specific analysis revealed similar survival rates for both groups. Sixty-two patients were diagnosed with recurrent disease, accounting for 29.4 % in the laparoscopic group and 28.2 % in the open group (difference 1.2 %; 95 % CI −11.1 to 13.5; p = 0.73). Seven patients had port- or wound-site recurrences (laparoscopic n = 3 vs. open n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer is associated with similar rates of disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrences as open surgery at 10-year follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5443846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54438462017-06-09 Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer Deijen, Charlotte L. Vasmel, Jeanine E. de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. Cuesta, Miguel A. Coene, Peter-Paul L. O. Lange, Johan F. Meijerink, W. J. H. Jeroen Jakimowicz, Jack J. Jeekel, Johannes Kazemier, Geert Janssen, Ignace M. C. Påhlman, Lars Haglind, Eva Bonjer, H. Jaap Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is associated with improved recovery and similar cancer outcomes at 3 and 5 years in comparison with open surgery. However, long-term survival rates have rarely been reported. Here, we present survival and recurrence rates of the Dutch patients included in the COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial at 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Between March 1997 and March 2003, patients with non-metastatic colon cancer were recruited by 29 hospitals in eight countries and randomised to either laparoscopic or open surgery. Main inclusion criterion for the COLOR trial was solitary adenocarcinoma of the left or right colon. The primary outcome was disease-free survival at 3 years, and secondary outcomes included overall survival and recurrence. The 10-year follow-up data of all Dutch patients were collected. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00387842). RESULTS: In total, 1248 patients were randomised, of which 329 were Dutch. Fifty-eight Dutch patients were excluded and 15 were lost to follow-up, leaving 256 patients for 10-year analysis. Median follow-up was 112 months. Disease-free survival rates were 45.2 % in the laparoscopic group and 43.2 % in the open group (difference 2.0 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) −10.3 to 14.3; p = 0.96). Overall survival rates were 48.4 and 46.7 %, respectively (difference 1.7 %; 95 % CI −10.6 to 14.0; p = 0.83). Stage-specific analysis revealed similar survival rates for both groups. Sixty-two patients were diagnosed with recurrent disease, accounting for 29.4 % in the laparoscopic group and 28.2 % in the open group (difference 1.2 %; 95 % CI −11.1 to 13.5; p = 0.73). Seven patients had port- or wound-site recurrences (laparoscopic n = 3 vs. open n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer is associated with similar rates of disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrences as open surgery at 10-year follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-10-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5443846/ /pubmed/27734203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Deijen, Charlotte L.
Vasmel, Jeanine E.
de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
Cuesta, Miguel A.
Coene, Peter-Paul L. O.
Lange, Johan F.
Meijerink, W. J. H. Jeroen
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Jeekel, Johannes
Kazemier, Geert
Janssen, Ignace M. C.
Påhlman, Lars
Haglind, Eva
Bonjer, H. Jaap
Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
title Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
title_full Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
title_fullStr Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
title_full_unstemmed Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
title_short Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
title_sort ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6
work_keys_str_mv AT deijencharlottel tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT vasmeljeaninee tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT delangedeklerkellysm tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT cuestamiguela tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT coenepeterpaullo tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT langejohanf tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT meijerinkwjhjeroen tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT jakimowiczjackj tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT jeekeljohannes tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT kazemiergeert tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT janssenignacemc tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT pahlmanlars tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT haglindeva tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT bonjerhjaap tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer
AT tenyearoutcomesofarandomisedtrialoflaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforcoloncancer