Cargando…
A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0 |
_version_ | 1783238642757533696 |
---|---|
author | Manning, Emily N. Leung, Kelvin K. Nicholas, Jennifer M. Malone, Ian B. Cardoso, M. Jorge Schott, Jonathan M. Fox, Nick C. Barnes, Josephine |
author_facet | Manning, Emily N. Leung, Kelvin K. Nicholas, Jennifer M. Malone, Ian B. Cardoso, M. Jorge Schott, Jonathan M. Fox, Nick C. Barnes, Josephine |
author_sort | Manning, Emily N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects at 6 months and 384 subjects at 12 months from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We calculated whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal atrophy rates using the k-means boundary shift integral (BSI). Scan quality was visually assessed and the proportion of good quality accelerated and non-accelerated scans compared. We also compared MMSE scores, vascular burden and age between subjects with poor quality scans with those with good quality scans. Finally, we estimated sample size requirements for a hypothetical clinical trial when using atrophy rates from accelerated scans and non-accelerated scans. No significant differences in whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal volumes and atrophy rates were found between accelerated and non-accelerated scans. Twice as many non-accelerated scan pairs suffered from at least some motion artefacts compared with accelerated scan pairs (p ≤ 0.001), which may influence the BSI. Subjects whose accelerated scans had significant motion had a higher mean vascular burden and age (p ≤ 0.05) whilst subjects whose non-accelerated scans had significant motion had poorer MMSE scores (p ≤ 0.05). No difference in estimated sample size requirements was found when using accelerated vs. non-accelerated scans. Accelerated scans reduce scan time and are better tolerated. Therefore it may be advantageous to use accelerated over non-accelerated scans in clinical trials that use ADNI-type protocols, especially in more cognitively impaired subjects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5443885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54438852017-06-09 A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset Manning, Emily N. Leung, Kelvin K. Nicholas, Jennifer M. Malone, Ian B. Cardoso, M. Jorge Schott, Jonathan M. Fox, Nick C. Barnes, Josephine Neuroinformatics Original Article The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects at 6 months and 384 subjects at 12 months from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We calculated whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal atrophy rates using the k-means boundary shift integral (BSI). Scan quality was visually assessed and the proportion of good quality accelerated and non-accelerated scans compared. We also compared MMSE scores, vascular burden and age between subjects with poor quality scans with those with good quality scans. Finally, we estimated sample size requirements for a hypothetical clinical trial when using atrophy rates from accelerated scans and non-accelerated scans. No significant differences in whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal volumes and atrophy rates were found between accelerated and non-accelerated scans. Twice as many non-accelerated scan pairs suffered from at least some motion artefacts compared with accelerated scan pairs (p ≤ 0.001), which may influence the BSI. Subjects whose accelerated scans had significant motion had a higher mean vascular burden and age (p ≤ 0.05) whilst subjects whose non-accelerated scans had significant motion had poorer MMSE scores (p ≤ 0.05). No difference in estimated sample size requirements was found when using accelerated vs. non-accelerated scans. Accelerated scans reduce scan time and are better tolerated. Therefore it may be advantageous to use accelerated over non-accelerated scans in clinical trials that use ADNI-type protocols, especially in more cognitively impaired subjects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-03-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5443885/ /pubmed/28316055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Manning, Emily N. Leung, Kelvin K. Nicholas, Jennifer M. Malone, Ian B. Cardoso, M. Jorge Schott, Jonathan M. Fox, Nick C. Barnes, Josephine A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset |
title | A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset |
title_full | A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset |
title_short | A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset |
title_sort | comparison of accelerated and non-accelerated mri scans for brain volume and boundary shift integral measures of volume change: evidence from the adni dataset |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manningemilyn acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT leungkelvink acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT nicholasjenniferm acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT maloneianb acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT cardosomjorge acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT schottjonathanm acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT foxnickc acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT barnesjosephine acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT manningemilyn comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT leungkelvink comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT nicholasjenniferm comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT maloneianb comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT cardosomjorge comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT schottjonathanm comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT foxnickc comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT barnesjosephine comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset AT comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset |