Cargando…

A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset

The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manning, Emily N., Leung, Kelvin K., Nicholas, Jennifer M., Malone, Ian B., Cardoso, M. Jorge, Schott, Jonathan M., Fox, Nick C., Barnes, Josephine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0
_version_ 1783238642757533696
author Manning, Emily N.
Leung, Kelvin K.
Nicholas, Jennifer M.
Malone, Ian B.
Cardoso, M. Jorge
Schott, Jonathan M.
Fox, Nick C.
Barnes, Josephine
author_facet Manning, Emily N.
Leung, Kelvin K.
Nicholas, Jennifer M.
Malone, Ian B.
Cardoso, M. Jorge
Schott, Jonathan M.
Fox, Nick C.
Barnes, Josephine
author_sort Manning, Emily N.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects at 6 months and 384 subjects at 12 months from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We calculated whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal atrophy rates using the k-means boundary shift integral (BSI). Scan quality was visually assessed and the proportion of good quality accelerated and non-accelerated scans compared. We also compared MMSE scores, vascular burden and age between subjects with poor quality scans with those with good quality scans. Finally, we estimated sample size requirements for a hypothetical clinical trial when using atrophy rates from accelerated scans and non-accelerated scans. No significant differences in whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal volumes and atrophy rates were found between accelerated and non-accelerated scans. Twice as many non-accelerated scan pairs suffered from at least some motion artefacts compared with accelerated scan pairs (p ≤ 0.001), which may influence the BSI. Subjects whose accelerated scans had significant motion had a higher mean vascular burden and age (p ≤ 0.05) whilst subjects whose non-accelerated scans had significant motion had poorer MMSE scores (p ≤ 0.05). No difference in estimated sample size requirements was found when using accelerated vs. non-accelerated scans. Accelerated scans reduce scan time and are better tolerated. Therefore it may be advantageous to use accelerated over non-accelerated scans in clinical trials that use ADNI-type protocols, especially in more cognitively impaired subjects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5443885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54438852017-06-09 A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset Manning, Emily N. Leung, Kelvin K. Nicholas, Jennifer M. Malone, Ian B. Cardoso, M. Jorge Schott, Jonathan M. Fox, Nick C. Barnes, Josephine Neuroinformatics Original Article The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects at 6 months and 384 subjects at 12 months from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We calculated whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal atrophy rates using the k-means boundary shift integral (BSI). Scan quality was visually assessed and the proportion of good quality accelerated and non-accelerated scans compared. We also compared MMSE scores, vascular burden and age between subjects with poor quality scans with those with good quality scans. Finally, we estimated sample size requirements for a hypothetical clinical trial when using atrophy rates from accelerated scans and non-accelerated scans. No significant differences in whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal volumes and atrophy rates were found between accelerated and non-accelerated scans. Twice as many non-accelerated scan pairs suffered from at least some motion artefacts compared with accelerated scan pairs (p ≤ 0.001), which may influence the BSI. Subjects whose accelerated scans had significant motion had a higher mean vascular burden and age (p ≤ 0.05) whilst subjects whose non-accelerated scans had significant motion had poorer MMSE scores (p ≤ 0.05). No difference in estimated sample size requirements was found when using accelerated vs. non-accelerated scans. Accelerated scans reduce scan time and are better tolerated. Therefore it may be advantageous to use accelerated over non-accelerated scans in clinical trials that use ADNI-type protocols, especially in more cognitively impaired subjects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-03-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5443885/ /pubmed/28316055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Manning, Emily N.
Leung, Kelvin K.
Nicholas, Jennifer M.
Malone, Ian B.
Cardoso, M. Jorge
Schott, Jonathan M.
Fox, Nick C.
Barnes, Josephine
A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
title A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
title_full A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
title_fullStr A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
title_short A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
title_sort comparison of accelerated and non-accelerated mri scans for brain volume and boundary shift integral measures of volume change: evidence from the adni dataset
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0
work_keys_str_mv AT manningemilyn acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT leungkelvink acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT nicholasjenniferm acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT maloneianb acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT cardosomjorge acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT schottjonathanm acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT foxnickc acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT barnesjosephine acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT acomparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT manningemilyn comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT leungkelvink comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT nicholasjenniferm comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT maloneianb comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT cardosomjorge comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT schottjonathanm comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT foxnickc comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT barnesjosephine comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset
AT comparisonofacceleratedandnonacceleratedmriscansforbrainvolumeandboundaryshiftintegralmeasuresofvolumechangeevidencefromtheadnidataset