Cargando…

China's fight to halt tree cover loss

China is investing immense resources for planting trees, totalling more than US$ 100 billion in the past decade alone. Every year, China reports more afforestation than the rest of the world combined. Here, we show that China's forest cover gains are highly definition-dependent. If the definiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahrends, Antje, Hollingsworth, Peter M., Beckschäfer, Philip, Chen, Huafang, Zomer, Robert J., Zhang, Lubiao, Wang, Mingcheng, Xu, Jianchu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2559
_version_ 1783238650879803392
author Ahrends, Antje
Hollingsworth, Peter M.
Beckschäfer, Philip
Chen, Huafang
Zomer, Robert J.
Zhang, Lubiao
Wang, Mingcheng
Xu, Jianchu
author_facet Ahrends, Antje
Hollingsworth, Peter M.
Beckschäfer, Philip
Chen, Huafang
Zomer, Robert J.
Zhang, Lubiao
Wang, Mingcheng
Xu, Jianchu
author_sort Ahrends, Antje
collection PubMed
description China is investing immense resources for planting trees, totalling more than US$ 100 billion in the past decade alone. Every year, China reports more afforestation than the rest of the world combined. Here, we show that China's forest cover gains are highly definition-dependent. If the definition of ‘forest’ follows FAO criteria (including immature and temporarily unstocked areas), China has gained 434 000 km(2) between 2000 and 2010. However, remotely detectable gains of vegetation that non-specialists would view as forest (tree cover higher than 5 m and minimum 50% crown cover) are an order of magnitude less (33 000 km(2)). Using high-resolution maps and environmental modelling, we estimate that approximately 50% of the world's forest with minimum 50% crown cover has been lost in the past approximately 10 000 years. China historically lost 1.9–2.7 million km(2) (59–67%), and substantial losses continue. At the same time, most of China's afforestation investment targets environments that our model classes as unsuitable for trees. Here, gains detectable via satellite imagery are limited. Conversely, the regions where modest gains are detected are environmentally suitable but have received little afforestation investment due to conflicting land-use demands for agriculture and urbanization. This highlights the need for refined forest monitoring, and greater consideration of environmental suitability in afforestation programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5443932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54439322017-05-26 China's fight to halt tree cover loss Ahrends, Antje Hollingsworth, Peter M. Beckschäfer, Philip Chen, Huafang Zomer, Robert J. Zhang, Lubiao Wang, Mingcheng Xu, Jianchu Proc Biol Sci Global Change and Conservation China is investing immense resources for planting trees, totalling more than US$ 100 billion in the past decade alone. Every year, China reports more afforestation than the rest of the world combined. Here, we show that China's forest cover gains are highly definition-dependent. If the definition of ‘forest’ follows FAO criteria (including immature and temporarily unstocked areas), China has gained 434 000 km(2) between 2000 and 2010. However, remotely detectable gains of vegetation that non-specialists would view as forest (tree cover higher than 5 m and minimum 50% crown cover) are an order of magnitude less (33 000 km(2)). Using high-resolution maps and environmental modelling, we estimate that approximately 50% of the world's forest with minimum 50% crown cover has been lost in the past approximately 10 000 years. China historically lost 1.9–2.7 million km(2) (59–67%), and substantial losses continue. At the same time, most of China's afforestation investment targets environments that our model classes as unsuitable for trees. Here, gains detectable via satellite imagery are limited. Conversely, the regions where modest gains are detected are environmentally suitable but have received little afforestation investment due to conflicting land-use demands for agriculture and urbanization. This highlights the need for refined forest monitoring, and greater consideration of environmental suitability in afforestation programmes. The Royal Society 2017-05-17 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5443932/ /pubmed/28469024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2559 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Global Change and Conservation
Ahrends, Antje
Hollingsworth, Peter M.
Beckschäfer, Philip
Chen, Huafang
Zomer, Robert J.
Zhang, Lubiao
Wang, Mingcheng
Xu, Jianchu
China's fight to halt tree cover loss
title China's fight to halt tree cover loss
title_full China's fight to halt tree cover loss
title_fullStr China's fight to halt tree cover loss
title_full_unstemmed China's fight to halt tree cover loss
title_short China's fight to halt tree cover loss
title_sort china's fight to halt tree cover loss
topic Global Change and Conservation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2559
work_keys_str_mv AT ahrendsantje chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT hollingsworthpeterm chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT beckschaferphilip chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT chenhuafang chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT zomerrobertj chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT zhanglubiao chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT wangmingcheng chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss
AT xujianchu chinasfighttohalttreecoverloss