Cargando…

Automated prediction of emphysema visual score using homology-based quantification of low-attenuation lung region

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between visual score of emphysema and homology-based emphysema quantification (HEQ) and evaluate whether visual score was accurately predicted by machine learning and HEQ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 115 anonymized comput...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishio, Mizuho, Nakane, Kazuaki, Kubo, Takeshi, Yakami, Masahiro, Emoto, Yutaka, Nishio, Mari, Togashi, Kaori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5444793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178217
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between visual score of emphysema and homology-based emphysema quantification (HEQ) and evaluate whether visual score was accurately predicted by machine learning and HEQ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 115 anonymized computed tomography images from 39 patients were obtained from a public database. Emphysema quantification of these images was performed by measuring the percentage of low-attenuation lung area (LAA%). The following values related to HEQ were obtained: nb(0) and nb(1). LAA% and HEQ were calculated at various threshold levels ranging from −1000 HU to −700 HU. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between emphysema quantification and visual score were calculated at the various threshold levels. Visual score was predicted by machine learning and emphysema quantification (LAA% or HEQ). Random Forest was used as a machine learning algorithm, and accuracy of prediction was evaluated by leave-one-patient-out cross validation. The difference in the accuracy was assessed using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients between emphysema quantification and visual score were as follows: LAA% (−950 HU), 0.567; LAA% (−910 HU), 0.654; LAA% (−875 HU), 0.704; nb(0) (−950 HU), 0.552; nb(0) (−910 HU), 0.629; nb(0) (−875 HU), 0.473; nb(1) (−950 HU), 0.149; nb(1) (−910 HU), 0.519; and nb(1) (−875 HU), 0.716. The accuracy of prediction was as follows: LAA%, 55.7% and HEQ, 66.1%. The difference in accuracy was statistically significant (p = 0.0290). CONCLUSION: LAA% and HEQ at −875 HU showed a stronger correlation with visual score than those at −910 or −950 HU. HEQ was more useful than LAA% for predicting visual score.