Cargando…
Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become the gold standard technique to measure cDNA and gDNA levels but the resulting data can be highly variable, artifactual and non-reproducible without appropriate verification and validation of both samples and primers. The root cause of poor quality data is typically...
Autores principales: | Taylor, Sean C., Laperriere, Genevieve, Germain, Hugo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5445070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02217-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Multiplex detection of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” and Spiroplasma citri by qPCR and droplet digital PCR
por: Maheshwari, Yogita, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and qPCR for the Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Bovine Feces
por: Verhaegen, Bavo, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
An Improved Reference Gene for Detection of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” Associated with Citrus Huanglongbing by qPCR and Digital Droplet PCR Assays
por: Keremane, Manjunath L., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of reverse-transcription qPCR and droplet digital PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens of hospitalized patients
por: Li, Jingyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The ‘PREXCEL-Q Method’ for qPCR
por: Gallup, Jack M., et al.
Publicado: (2008)